The German Ideology: Volume I, Chapter 1, Part C

The German Ideology: Volume I, Chapter 1, Part C



Karl Marx the German ideology part i fewer buck opposition of the materialist and idealist outlook see the real basis of ideology division of labor town and country one from the first there follows the premise of a highly developed division of labor and an extensive commerce from the second the locality in the first case the individuals must be brought together in the second they find themselves alongside the given instrument of production as instruments of production themselves here therefore arises the difference between natural instruments of production and those created by civilization the field water etc can be regarded as a natural instrument of production in the first case that of the natural instrument of production individuals are subservient to nature in the second – a product of labour in the first case therefore property landed property appears as direct natural domination in the second as domination of labour particularly of accumulated labour capital the first case presupposes that the individuals are united by some bond family tribe the land itself etc the second that they are independent of one another and are only held together by exchange in the first case what is involved is chiefly an exchange between men and nature in which the labor of the former is exchanged for the products of the latter in the second it is predominantly an exchange of men among themselves in the first case average human common sense is adequate physical activity is as yet not separated from mental activity in the second the division between physical and mental labour must already be practically completed in the first case the domination of the proprietor over the property less may be based on a personal relationship on a kind of community in the second it must have taken on a material shape in a third party money in the first small industry exists but determined by the utilization of the natural instrument of production and therefore without the distribution of labour among various individuals in the second industry exists only in and through the division of labour to the division of material and mental labour separation of town and country the guild system the greatest division of material and mental labour is the separation of town and country the antagonism between town and country begins with the transition from barbarism to civilization from tribe to state from locality to nation and runs through the whole history of civilization to the present day the anti corn la ligue the existence of the town implies at the same time the necessity of administration police taxes etc in short of the municipality and thus of politics in general here first became manifest the division of the population into two great classes which is directly based on the division of labor and on the instruments of production the town already is in actual fact the concentration of the population of the instruments of production of capital of pleasures of needs while the country demonstrates just the opposite fact isolation and separation the antagonism between town and country can only exist within the framework of private property it is the most crass expression of the subjection of the individual under the division of labour under a definite activity forced upon him a subjection which makes one man into a restricted town animal the other into a restricted country animal and daily creates a new the conflict between their interests labor is here again the cheap thing power over individuals and as long as the latter exists private property must exist the abolition of the antagonism between town and country is one of the first conditions of communal life a condition which again depends on a mass of material premises and which cannot be fulfilled by the mere will as anyone can see at the first glance these conditions have still to be enumerated the separation of town and country can also be understood as the separation of capital and landed property as the beginning of the existence and development of capital independent of landed property the beginning of property having its basis only in labor and exchange in the towns which in the Middle Ages did not derive ready-made from an earlier period but were formed a new by the serfs who had become free each man's own particular labour was his only property apart from the small capital he brought with him consisting almost solely of the most necessary tools of his craft the competition of serfs constantly escaping into the town the constant war of the country against the towns and thus the necessity of an organized municipal military force the bond of common ownership in a particular kind of labour the necessity of common buildings for the sale of their wares at a time when craftsmen were also traders and the consequent exclusion of the unauthorized from these buildings the conflict among the interests of the various crafts the necessity of protecting their laborious Lee acquired skill and the feudal organization of the whole of the country these were the causes of the union of the workers of each craft in guilds we have not at this point to go further into the manifold modifications of the guild system which arise through later historical developments the flight of the serfs into the towns went on without interruption right through the Middle Ages these serves persecuted by their Lords in the country came separately into the towns where they found an organized community against which they were powerless and in which they had to subject themselves to the station assigned to them by the demand for their labor and the interest of their organized urban competitors these workers entering separately were never able to attain to any power since if their labor was of the guild type which had to be learned the guild masters bent them to their will and organize them according to their interest or if their labor was not such as had to be learned and therefore not of the guild type they became day laborers and never managed to organize remaining an unorganized rabble the need for day laborers in the towns created the rabble these towns were true associations called forth by the direct need the care of providing for the protection of property and of multiplying the means of production and defense of the separate members the rabble of these towns was devoid of any power composed as it was of individuals strange to one another who had entered separately and who stood unorganized over against an organized power armed for war and jealously watching over them the journeymen and apprentices were organized in each craft as it best suited the interest of the Masters the patriarchal relationship existing between them and their masters gave the latter a double power on the one hand because of their influence on the whole life of the journeyman and on the other because for the journeyman who worked with the same master it was a real bond which held them together against the journeyman of other masters and separated them from these and finally the journeyman were bound to the existing order by their simple interest in becoming masters themselves while therefore the rabble at least carried out revolts against the whole municipal order revolts which remained completely ineffective because of their powerlessness the journeyman never got further than small acts of insubordination within separate guilds such as belong to the very nature of the guild system the great risings of the Middle Ages all radiated from the country but equally remained totally ineffective because of the isolation and consequent crudité of the peasants in the towns the division of labour between the individual guilds was as yet quite naturally derived and in the guilds themselves not at all developed between the individual workers every workman had to be versed in a whole round of tasks had to be able to make everything that was to be made with his tools the limited Commerce and the scanty communication between the individual towns the lack of population and the narrow needs did not allow have a higher division of labor and therefore every man who wished to become a master had to be proficient in the whole of his craft thus there is found with medieval craftsmen an interest in their special work and in proficiency in it which was capable of rising to a narrow artistic sense for this very reason however every medieval craftsman was completely absorbed in his work to which he had a contented slavish relationship and to which he was subjected to a far greater extent than the modern worker whose work is a matter of indifference to him capital in these towns was a naturally derived capital consisting of a house the tools of the craft and the natural hereditary customers and not being realizable on account of the backwardness of Commerce and the lack of circulation it descended from father to son unlike modern capital which can be assessed in money and which may be indifferent Lee invested in this thing or that this capital was directly connected with the particular work of the owner inseparable from it and to this extent a state capital further division of labor the next extension of the division of labor was the separation of production and commerce the formation of a special class of merchants a separation which in the towns bequeath it by a former period had been handed down among other things with the Jews and which very soon appeared in the newly formed ones with this there was given the possibility of commercial communications transcending the immediate neighbourhood a possibility the realization of which depended on the existing means of communication the state of public safety in the countryside which was determined by political conditions during the whole of the Middle Ages as is well known the merchants traveled in armed caravans and on the cruder or more advanced needs determined by the stage of culture attained of the region accessible to intercourse with commerce the prerogative of a particular class with the extension of trade through the merchants beyond the immediate surroundings of the town there immediately appears a reciprocal action between production and commerce the towns enter into relations with one another new tools are brought from one town into the other and the separation between production and commerce soon calls forth a new division of production between the individual towns each of which is soon exploiting a predominant branch of Industry the local restorer of earlier times begin gradually to be broken down it depends purely on the extension of Commerce whether the productive forces achieved in a locality especially inventions are lost for later development or not as long as there exists no commerce transcending the immediate neighborhood every invention must be made separately in each locality and mere chances such as eruptions of barbaric people's even ordinary Wars are sufficient to cause a country with advanced productive forces and needs to have to start right over again from the beginning in primitive history every invention had to be made daily anew and in each locality independently how little highly developed productive forces are safe from complete destruction given even a relatively very extensive commerce is proved by the Phoenicians whose inventions were for the most part lost for a long time to come through the ousting of this nation from commerce its conquest by Alexander and it's consequent decline likewise for instance glass painting in the Middle Ages only when Commerce has become world commerce and has as its basis large-scale industry when all nations are drawn into the competitive struggle is the permanence of the acquired productive forces assured the rise of manufacturing the immediate consequence of the division of labor between the various towns was the rise of manufactures branches of production which had outgrown the guild system manufacturers first flourished in Italy and later in Flanders under the historical premise of commerce with foreign nations in other countries England and France for example manufacturers were at first confined to the home market besides the premises already mentioned manufacturers depend on an already advanced concentration of population particularly in the countryside and of capital which began to accumulate in the hands of individuals partly in the guilds in spite of the guild regulations partly among the merchants that labor which from the first presupposed to machine even of the crudest sort soon showed itself the most capable of development weaving earlier carried on in the country by the peasants as a secondary occupation to procure their clothing was the first labour to receive an impetus and a further development through the extension of Commerce weaving was the first and remained the principle manufacture the rising demand for clothing materials consequent on the growth of population the growing accumulation and mobilisation of natural capital through accelerated circulation the demand for luxuries called forth by the latter and favored generally by the gradual extension of Commerce gave weaving a quantitative and qualitative stimulus which wrenched it out of the form of production hitherto existing alongside the peasants weaving for their own use who continued and still continue with this sort of work there emerged a new class of weavers in the towns whose fabrics were destined for the whole home market and usually for foreign markets – weaving an occupation demanding in most cases little skill and soon splitting up into countless branches by its whole nature resisted the trammels of the guild weaving was therefore carried on mostly in villages and market centers without guild organization which gradually became towns and indeed the most flourishing towns in each land with guilt-free manufacture property relations also quickly changed the first advanced beyond naturally derived the state capital was provided by the rise of merchants whose capital was from the beginning movable capital in the modern sense as far as one can speak of it given the circumstances of those times the second advance came with manufacture which again made mobile a mass of natural capital and altogether increased the mass of movable capital as against that of natural capital at the same time manufacturer became a refuge of the peasants from the guilds which excluded them or paid them badly just as earlier the guild towns had served as a refuge for the peasants from the oppressive landed nobility simultaneously with the beginning of manufacturers there was a period of vagabondage caused by the abolition of the feudal bodies of retainers the disbanding of the swollen armies which had flocked to serve the Kings against their vessels the improvement of Agriculture and the transformation of great strips of tillage into pasture land from this alone it is clear how this vagabondage is strictly connected with the disintegration of the feudal system as early as the 13th century we find isolated epochs of this kind but only at the end of the fifteenth and beginning of the sixteenth does this vagabondage make a general and permanent appearance these vagabonds who were so numerous that for instance Henry eight of England had 72,000 of them hanged were only prevailed upon to work with the greatest difficulty and through the most extreme necessity and then only after long resistance the rapid rise of manufacturers particularly in England absorbed them gradually with the advent of manufactures the various nations entered into a competitive relationship the struggle for trade which was fought out in Wars protective beauties and prohibitions whereas earlier the nations insofar as they were connected at all had carried on an inoffensive exchange with each other trade had from now on a political significance with the advent of manufacture the relationship between worker and employer changed in the Guild's the patriarchal relationship between journeyman and master continued to exist in manufacture its place was taken by the monetary relation between worker and capitalist a relationship which in the countryside and in small towns retained a patriarchal tinge but in the larger the real manufacturing towns quite early lost almost all patriarchal complexion manufacture and the movement of production in general received an enormous impetus through the extension of Commerce which came with the discovery of America and the sea route to the East Indies the new products imported thence particularly the masses of gold and silver which came into circulation and totally changed the position of the classes towards one another dealing a hard blow to feudal landed property and to the workers the expeditions of adventurers colonisation and above all the extension of markets into a world market which had now become possible and was daily becoming more and more fact called forth a new phase of historical development into which in general we cannot here enter further through the colonization of the newly discovered countries the commercial struggle of the nations amongst one another was given new fuel and accordingly greater extension and animosity the expansion of trade and manufacture accelerated the accumulation of movable capital while in the Guild's which were not stimulated to extend their production natural capital remains stationary or even declined trade and manufacture created the big bridge huazi in the gilts was concentrated the petty bourgeoisie which no longer was dominant in the towns as formerly but had to bow to the might of the great merchants and manufacturers hence the decline of the guilds as soon as they came into contact with manufacture the intercourse of nations took on in the epoch of which we have been speaking two different forms at first the small quantity of gold and silver in circulation involved the ban on the export of these metals and Industry for the most part imported from abroad and made necessary by the need for employing the growing urban population could not do without those privileges which could be granted not only of course against home competition but chiefly against foreign the local guild privilege was in these original prohibitions extended over the whole nation customs duties originated from the tributes which the feudal lords exacted as protective levies against robbery from merchants passing through their territories tributes later imposed likewise by the towns and which with the rise of the modern states were the Treasuries most obvious means of raising money the appearance of American gold and silver on the European markets the gradual development of industry the rapid expansion of trade and the consequent rise of the non guild bourgeoisie and of money gave these measures and other significance the state which was daily less and less able to do without money now retain the ban on the export of gold and silver out of fiscal considerations the bourgeois for whom these masses of money which were hurled onto the market became the chief object of speculated buying were thoroughly content with this privilege is established earlier became a source of income for the government and were sold for money in the customs legislation there appeared the export duty which since it only placed a hindrance in the way of industry had a purely fiscal aim the second period began in the middle of the 17th century and lasted almost to the end of the 18th Commerce and navigation had expanded more rapidly than manufacture which played a secondary role the colonies were becoming considerable consumers and after long struggles the separate nations shared out the opening world market among themselves this period begins with the navigation laws – and colonial monopolies the competition of the nations among themselves was excluded as far as possible by tariffs prohibitions and treaties and in the last resort the competitive struggle was carried on and decided by Wars especially naval Wars the mightiest maritime nation the English retained preponderance in trade and manufacture here already we find concentration in one country manufacture was all the time sheltered by protective beauties in the home market by monopolies in the colonial market and abroad as much as possible by differential beauties the working up of home produced material was encouraged will and linen in England silk in France the export of home produced raw material forbidden will in England and the working up of imported material neglected or suppressed cotton in England the nation dominant in sea trade and colonial power naturally secured for itself also the greatest quantitative and qualitative expansion of manufacture manufacture could not be carried on without protection since if the slightest change takes place in other countries it can lose its market and be ruined under reasonably favorable conditions it may easily be introduced into a country but for this very reason can easily be destroyed at the same time through the mode in which it is carried on particularly in the 18th century in the countryside it is to such an extent interwoven with the vital relationships of a great mass of individuals that no country dare jeopardize its existence by permitting free competition insofar as it manages to export it therefore depends entirely on the extension or restriction of Commerce and exercises a relatively very small reaction on the ladder hence its secondary importance and the influence of the merchants in the 18th century it was the merchants and especially the shippers who more than anybody else pressed for state protection and monopolies the manufacturers also demanded and indeed received protection but all the time were inferior in political importance to the merchants the commercial towns particularly the maritime towns became to some extent civilized and acquired the outlook of the big bourgeoisie but in the factory towns an extreme petty bourgeois outlook persisted CF akin 3 etc the 18th century was the century of trade Pinto says this expressly le commerce fait la merit du siècle and Depp you ask well que temporal and EST plus question QD commerce d negation ET d marine commerce is the rage of the century for some time now people have been talking only about commerce navigation and the Navy edition this period is also characterized by the cessation of the bans on the export of gold and silver and the beginning of the trade in money by banks national debts paper money by speculation in stocks and shares and stock jobbing in all articles by the development of Finance in general again capital lost a great part of the natural character which had still clung to it for most extensive division of labour large-scale industry the concentration of trade and manufacture in one country England developing irresistible in the 17th century gradually created for this country a relative world market and thus a demand for the manufactured products of this country which could no longer be met by the industrial productive forces hitherto existing this demand outgrowing the productive forces was the motive power which by producing big industry the application of elemental forces to industrial ends machinery and the most complex division of labour called into existence the third period of private ownership since the Middle Ages there already existed in England the other preconditions of this new phase freedom of competition inside the nation the development of theoretical mechanics etc indeed the science of mechanics perfected by Newton was altogether the most popular science in France and England in the 18th century free competition inside the nation itself had everywhere to be conquered by a revolution 1640 and 1688 in England 1789 in France competition soon compelled every country that wished to retain its historical role to protect its manufacturers by renewed customs regulations the old beauties were no longer any good against big industry and soon after to introduce big industry under protective beauties big industry Universalist competition in spite of these protective measures it is practical free trade the protective duty is only a palliative a measure of defense within free trade established means of communication and the modern world market subordinated trade to itself transformed all capital into industrial capital and thus produced the rapid circulation development of the financial system and the centralization of capital by universal competition it forced all individuals to strain their energy to the utmost it destroyed as far as possible ideology religion morality etc and where it could not do this made them into a palpable lie it produced world history for the first time insofar as it made all civilized nations and every individual member of them dependent for the satisfaction of their wants on the whole world thus destroying the former natural exclusiveness of separate nations it made natural science subservient to capital and took from the division of labor the last semblance of its natural character it destroyed natural growth in general as far as this is possible while labor exists and resolved all natural relationships into money relationships in the place of naturally grown towns it created the modern large industrial cities which have sprung up overnight wherever it penetrated it destroyed the crafts and all earlier stages of Industry it completed the victory of the commercial town over the countryside its first premise was the automatic system its development produced a mass of productive forces for which private property became just as much a fetter as the guild had been for manufacture and the small rural workshop for the developing craft these productive forces received under the system of private property a one-sided development only and became for the majority destructive forces moreover a great multitude of such forces could find no application at all within the system generally speaking big industry created everywhere the same relations between the classes of society and thus destroyed the peculiar individuality of the various nationalities and finally while the bourgeoisie of each nation still retains separate national interests big industry created a class which in all nations has the same interest and with which nationality is already dead a class which is really rid of all the old world and at the same time stands pitted against it big industry makes for the worker not only the relation to the capitalist but labour itself unbearable it is evident that big industry does not reach the same level of development in all districts of a country this does not however retard the class movement of the proletariat because the proletarians created by big industry assumed leadership of this movement and carry the whole mass along with them and because the workers excluded from big industry are placed by it in a still worse situation than the workers in big industry itself the countries in which big industry is developed act in a similar manner upon the more or less non industrial countries insofar as the latter are swept by universal commerce into the universal competitive struggle for these different forms are just so many forms of the organization of Labor and hence of property in each period a unification of the existing productive forces takes place insofar as this has been rendered necessary by needs the relation of state and law to property the first form of property in the ancient world as in the Middle Ages is tribal property determined with the Romans chiefly by war with the Germans by the rearing of cattle in the case of the ancient peoples since several tribes live together in one town the tribal property appears as state property and the right of the individual to it as mere possession which however like tribal property as a whole is confined to landed property only real private property began with the ancients as with modern nations with movable property slavery and community dominium ex jerk we're at m5 in the case of the nations which grew out of the Middle Ages tribal property evolved through various stages feudal landed property corporative movable property capital invested in manufactured to modern capital determined by big industry and universal competition ie pure private property which has cast off all semblance of a communal institution and has shut out the state from any influence on the development of property to this modern private property corresponds the modern state which purchased gradually by the owners of property by means of Taxation has fallen entirely into their hands through the national debt and its existence has become wholly dependent on the commercial credit which the owners of property the bourgeois extend to it as reflected in the rise and fall of state funds on the stock exchange by the mere fact that it is a class and no longer in a state the bourgeoisie is forced to organize itself no longer locally but nationally and to give a general form to its mean average interest through the emancipation of private property from the community the state has become a separate entity beside an outside civil society but it is nothing more than the form of organization which the bourgeois necessarily adopt both for internal and external purposes for the mutual guarantee of their property and interests the independence of the state is only found nowadays in those countries where the estates have not yet completely developed into classes where the estate's done away with in more advanced countries still have a part to play and where there exists a mixture countries that is to say in which no one section of the population can achieve dominance over the others this is the case particularly in Germany the most perfect example of the modern state is North America the modern French English and American writers all expressed the opinion that the state exists only for the sake of private property so that this fact has penetrated into the consciousness of the normal man since the state is the form in which the individuals of a ruling class assert their common interests and in which the whole civil society of an epoch is epitomized it follows that the state mediate sin the formation of all common institutions and that the institutions receive a political form hence the illusion that law is based on the will and indeed on the will divorced from its real basis on free will similarly justice is in its turn reduced to the actual laws civil law develops simultaneously with private property out of the disintegration of the natural community with the Romans the development of private property and civil law had no further industrial and commercial consequences because their whole mode of production did not alter usury with modern peoples where the feudal community was disintegrated by industry and trade there began with the rise of private property and civil law a new phase which was capable of further development the very first town which carried on an extensive maritime trade in the Middle Ages amalfi also developed maritime law as soon as industry and trade developed private property further first in Italy and later in other countries the highly developed Roman civil law was immediately adopted again and razed to Authority when later the bourgeoisie had acquired so much power that the princes took up its interests in order to overthrow the feudal nobility by means of the bourgeoisie there began in all countries in France in the 16th century the real development of law which in all countries except England proceeded on the basis of the Roman codex in England to Roman legal principles had to be introduced to further the development of civil law especially in the case of movable property it must not be forgotten that law has just as little an independent history as religion in civil law the existing property relationships are declared to be the result of the general will the usio tend to ET ABO 10 d6 itself asserts on the one hand the fact that private property has become entirely independent of the community and on the other the illusion that private property itself is based solely on the private will the arbitrary disposal of the thing in practice the Oh beauty has very definite economic limitations for the owner of private property if he does not wish to see his property and hence his use of the attendee pass into other hands since actually the thing considered merely with reference to his will is not a thing at all but only becomes a thing true property in intercourse and independently of the law a relationship which the philosophers call an idea this juridical illusion which reduces law to the mere will necessarily leads in the further development of property relationships to the position that a man may have a legal title to a thing without really having the thing if for instance the income from a piece of land is lost owing to competition then the proprietor has certainly his legal title to it along with the you see of 10 Det OB attending but he can do nothing with it he owns nothing as a landed proprietor if in addition he has not enough capital to cultivate his ground this allusion of the jurists also explains the fact that for them as for every code it is altogether fortuitous that individuals enter into relationships among themselves for example contracts it explains why they consider that these relationships can be entered into or not at will and that their content rests purely on the individual free will of the contracting parties whenever through the development of industry and commerce new forms of intercourse have been evolved for example assurance companies etc the law has always been compelled to admit them among the modes of acquiring property notes written by marks intended for further elaboration twelve forms of social consciousness the influence of the division of labor on science the role of repression with regard to the state law morality etc it is precisely because the bourgeoisie rules as a class that in the law it must give itself a general expression natural science and history there is no history of politics law science etc of art religion etc marginal note by Marx to the community as it appears in the ancient state in feudalism and in the absolute monarchy to this bond correspond especially the religious conceptions why the ideologists turn everything upside down clerics jurists politicians jurists politicians statesmen in general moralists clerics for this ideological subdivision within a class one the occupation assumes an independent existence owing to division of labour everyone believes his craft to be the true one illusions regarding the connection between their craft and reality are the more likely to be cherished by them because of the very nature of the craft in consciousness in jurisprudence politics etc relations become concepts since they do not go beyond these relations the concepts of the relations also become fixed concepts in their mind the judge for example applies the code he therefore regards legislation as the real active driving force respect for their goods because their craft deals with general matters idea of law idea of state is turned upside down in ordinary consciousness religion is from the outset consciousness of the transcendental arising from actually existing forces this more popularly tradition with regard to law religion etc individuals always proceeded and always proceeded from themselves their relations are the relations of their real life process how does it happen that their relations assume an independent existence over against them and that the forces of their own life becomes superior to them in short division of labor the level of which depends on the development of the productive power at any particular time landed property communal property feudal modern estate property manufacturing property industrial capital footnotes 1 4 pages of the manuscript are missing here addition to navigation laws a series of Acts passed in England from 1381 onwards to protect English shipping against foreign companies the navigation laws were modified in the early 19th century and repealed in 1849 except for a reservation regarding coasting trade which was revoked in 1854 3 the movement of capital although considerably accelerated still remained however relatively slow the splitting up of the world market into separate parts each of which was exploited by a particular nation the exclusion of competition among themselves on the part of the nations the clumsiness of production itself and the fact that finance was only evolving from its early stages greatly impeded circulation the consequence of this was a haggling mean and niggardly spirit which still clung to all merchants and to the whole mode of carrying on trade compared with the manufacturers and above all with the craftsmen they were certainly big bourgeois compared with the merchants and industrialists of the next period they remained petit bourgeois CF Adam Smith six competition of individuals and the formation of classes for competition separates individuals from one another not only the bourgeois but still more the workers in spite of the fact that it brings them together hence it is a long time before these individuals can unite apart from the fact that for the purposes of this union if it is not to be merely local the necessary means the great industrial cities and cheap and quick communications have first to be produced by big industry hence every organized power standing over against these isolated individuals who live in relationships daily reproducing this isolation can only be overcome after long struggles to demand the opposite would be tantamount to demanding that competition should not exist in this definite epoch of history or that the individuals should vanish from their minds relationships over which in their isolation they have no control five ownership in accordance with the law applying to full Roman citizens Edition six the right of using and consuming also abusing ie of disposing of a thing at will addition

One thought on “The German Ideology: Volume I, Chapter 1, Part C

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *