Rasmussen: ‘Absolutely None Of My Time’ In Gov. Was Spent On Domestic Terrorism | MTP Daily | MSNBC

Rasmussen: ‘Absolutely None Of My Time’ In Gov. Was Spent On Domestic Terrorism | MTP Daily | MSNBC


>>>WELCOME BACK.>>>WELCOME BACK. THE FBI ANNOUNCED LATE THIS THE FBI ANNOUNCED LATE THIS AFTERNOON THEY ARE INVESTIGATING AFTERNOON THEY ARE INVESTIGATING LAST WEEK’S MASS SHOOTING IN LAST WEEK’S MASS SHOOTING IN GILROY, CALIFORNIA HAS DOMESTIC GILROY, CALIFORNIA HAS DOMESTIC TERRORISM. TERRORISM. THEY DISCOVERED A TARGET LIST THEY DISCOVERED A TARGET LIST THAT MENTIONED RELIGIOUS THAT MENTIONED RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION, FEDERAL BUILDINGS INSTITUTION, FEDERAL BUILDINGS AND BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES BUT AND BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES BUT THEY DID NOT REVEAL ANYMORE THEY DID NOT REVEAL ANYMORE INFORMATION THAN THAT. INFORMATION THAN THAT. THAT DEVELOPMENT COMES AS FARL THAT DEVELOPMENT COMES AS FARL INVESTIGATORS ARE TREATING THE INVESTIGATORS ARE TREATING THE MASSACRE IN EL PASO AS DOMESTIC MASSACRE IN EL PASO AS DOMESTIC TERRORISM. TERRORISM. NBC NEWS REPORTS THE DEPARTMENT NBC NEWS REPORTS THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY HAS MADE OF HOMELAND SECURITY HAS MADE CUTS TO PERSONNEL AND RESOURCES CUTS TO PERSONNEL AND RESOURCES TO FIGHT DOMESTIC TERRORISM. TO FIGHT DOMESTIC TERRORISM. PERHAPS THAT WILL CHANGE BUT PERHAPS THAT WILL CHANGE BUT RIGHT NOW THAT’S THE FACTS. RIGHT NOW THAT’S THE FACTS. FEDERAL AGENCIES DO NOT HAVE THE FEDERAL AGENCIES DO NOT HAVE THE SAME AUTHORITY TO PURSUE SAME AUTHORITY TO PURSUE DOMESTIC TERRORISM SUSPECTS AS DOMESTIC TERRORISM SUSPECTS AS IN FOREIGN INVESTIGATIONS. IN FOREIGN INVESTIGATIONS. THERE’S NO FEDERAL LAW ON THE THERE’S NO FEDERAL LAW ON THE BOOKS FOR DOMESTIC TERRORISM. BOOKS FOR DOMESTIC TERRORISM. JOINING ME NOW SOMEONE WITH A JOINING ME NOW SOMEONE WITH A LOT OF EXPERIENCE IN THE COUNTER LOT OF EXPERIENCE IN THE COUNTER TERRORISM WORLD IS THE DIRECTOR TERRORISM WORLD IS THE DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL COUNTER OF THE NATIONAL COUNTER TERRORISM CENTER. TERRORISM CENTER. GOOD TO SEE YOU. GOOD TO SEE YOU.>>GOOD TO BE HERE.>>GOOD TO BE HERE.>>DOMESTIC TERRORISM, HOUMPW MU>>DOMESTIC TERRORISM, HOUMPW MU OF YOUR JOB WAS TAKEN UP BY OF YOUR JOB WAS TAKEN UP BY THAT? THAT?>>NONE.>>NONE. IN THE PERIOD AFTER 9/11 WHEN IN THE PERIOD AFTER 9/11 WHEN THE NATIONAL COUNTER TERRORISM THE NATIONAL COUNTER TERRORISM CENTER WAS CREATED, THE CENTER WAS CREATED, THE LEGISLATION THAT CREATED IT SAID LEGISLATION THAT CREATED IT SAID IT WILL DO ALL OF THIS STUFF IT WILL DO ALL OF THIS STUFF RELATED TO TERRORISM EXCEPT FOR RELATED TO TERRORISM EXCEPT FOR DOMESTIC TERRORISM BECAUSE THAT DOMESTIC TERRORISM BECAUSE THAT WAS SEEN TO BE IN FBI’S PURVIEW WAS SEEN TO BE IN FBI’S PURVIEW AND THEY WOULD FOCUS ALONG WITH AND THEY WOULD FOCUS ALONG WITH THE OTHER INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES THE OTHER INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES ON THE OVERSEAS TERRORISM ON THE OVERSEAS TERRORISM PROBLEM. PROBLEM.>>IF YOU TURNED INTO A CELL>>IF YOU TURNED INTO A CELL THAT WAS DOMESTIC AND NOT THAT WAS DOMESTIC AND NOT FOREIGN, EVEN ON AMERICAN SOIL, FOREIGN, EVEN ON AMERICAN SOIL, YOU JUST WALK AWAY? YOU JUST WALK AWAY?>>WE WOULD LOOK AT INDIVIDUALS>>WE WOULD LOOK AT INDIVIDUALS IN THE HOMELAND OR GROUP OR IN THE HOMELAND OR GROUP OR PEOPLE OR CLUSTERS OF PEOPLE IN PEOPLE OR CLUSTERS OF PEOPLE IN THE HOMELAND WHO WERE TIED TO THE HOMELAND WHO WERE TIED TO IDEOLOGIES FROM OVERSEAS. IDEOLOGIES FROM OVERSEAS. ISIS INSPIRES INDIVIDUALS, AL ISIS INSPIRES INDIVIDUALS, AL QAEDA INSPIRED INDIVIDUALS WOULD QAEDA INSPIRED INDIVIDUALS WOULD BE VIEWED AS INTERNATIONAL BE VIEWED AS INTERNATIONAL TERRORISTS EVEN THOUGH THEY WERE TERRORISTS EVEN THOUGH THEY WERE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS LIVING AND IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS LIVING AND WORKING RIGHT DOWN THE STREET WORKING RIGHT DOWN THE STREET FROM ALL OF US. FROM ALL OF US.>>WHAT’S THE SIGNIFICANCE OF>>WHAT’S THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FBI SAYING THEY ARE THE FBI SAYING THEY ARE INVESTIGATING SOMETHING AS DO INVESTIGATING SOMETHING AS DO DOMESTIC TERRORISM. DOMESTIC TERRORISM.>>I’M NOT SURE THERE’S A>>I’M NOT SURE THERE’S A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF LEGAL TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE. SIGNIFICANCE. AS YOU POINTED OUT THERE’S NOT A AS YOU POINTED OUT THERE’S NOT A DOMESTIC TERRORISM STATUT DOMESTIC TERRORISM STATUT EARTHQUAKE. EARTHQUAKE. IT’S DEFINED IN LAW BUT IT’S NOT IT’S DEFINED IN LAW BUT IT’S NOT PROHIBITED IN A WAY THAT ALLOWS PROHIBITED IN A WAY THAT ALLOWS THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO CHARGE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO CHARGE AN INDIVIDUAL WITH DOMESTIC AN INDIVIDUAL WITH DOMESTIC TERRORISM. TERRORISM. IT’S MORE OF A CAT GOREGORYIZATI IT’S MORE OF A CAT GOREGORYIZATI THEY WILL WORK THE PROBLEM THEY WILL WORK THE PROBLEM BECAUSE IT’S DOMESTIC TERRORISM. BECAUSE IT’S DOMESTIC TERRORISM.>>WHAT MAKES SOMEONE A DOMESTIC>>WHAT MAKES SOMEONE A DOMESTIC TERRORISM? TERRORISM?>>WHEN A VIOLENT ACT IS>>WHEN A VIOLENT ACT IS UNDERTAKEN WITH THE IDEA OF UNDERTAKEN WITH THE IDEA OF PRESSURING THE GOVERNMENT, PRESSURING THE GOVERNMENT, INFLUENCING THE GOVERNMENT, INFLUENCING THE GOVERNMENT, INTIMIDATING THE POPULATION FOR INTIMIDATING THE POPULATION FOR A POLITICAL END THAT MAKES IT A POLITICAL END THAT MAKES IT TERRORISM. TERRORISM. THAT DISTINGUISHING IT FROM RAN THAT DISTINGUISHING IT FROM RAN DAN ACT DAN ACT RANDOM ACTS OF VIOLENCE. RANDOM ACTS OF VIOLENCE.>>THERE’S A LINE BETWEEN>>THERE’S A LINE BETWEEN POLITICAL MOTIVE AND POLITICAL POLITICAL MOTIVE AND POLITICAL BELIEFS. BELIEFS. THERE’S A LOT OF PEOPLE ON THE THERE’S A LOT OF PEOPLE ON THE RIGHT TRYING TO MAKE THE DAYTON RIGHT TRYING TO MAKE THE DAYTON STORY PART OF THE EL PASO. STORY PART OF THE EL PASO.>>WE MAY KNOW A BIT ABOUT THE>>WE MAY KNOW A BIT ABOUT THE PERSON’S POLITICAL INCLINATIONS PERSON’S POLITICAL INCLINATIONS BUT THERE’S NO INFORMATION THAT BUT THERE’S NO INFORMATION THAT THE ACT WAS TIED TO A POLITICAL THE ACT WAS TIED TO A POLITICAL AGENDA. AGENDA. WHEREAS IN EL PASO, IT WAS A WHEREAS IN EL PASO, IT WAS A ABUNDANTLY CLEAR. ABUNDANTLY CLEAR.>>THE ACT IS MOTIVATED IN DO>>THE ACT IS MOTIVATED IN DO DOMESTIC TERRORISM. DOMESTIC TERRORISM. THAT’S HA GETS IT THAT TAG. THAT’S HA GETS IT THAT TAG.>>YES.>>YES.>>GIVE ME THE LIMBITATIONS YOU>>GIVE ME THE LIMBITATIONS YOU HAVE. HAVE. WHAT POWER WOULD YOU NEED FROM WHAT POWER WOULD YOU NEED FROM THE FLAL — FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE FLAL — FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT YOU DON’T HAVE. THAT YOU DON’T HAVE. IF AN VIN LATCHES ON AS PART OF IF AN VIN LATCHES ON AS PART OF THEIR POLICE CHIEF SYSTEM AND THEIR POLICE CHIEF SYSTEM AND TAKE SOME STEPS TO ACT ON THAT. TAKE SOME STEPS TO ACT ON THAT. THEY TRY TO GO INTO TURKEY. THEY TRY TO GO INTO TURKEY.>>IT’S BEEN A STANDARD FBI TRAP>>IT’S BEEN A STANDARD FBI TRAP FOR THESE GUYS OVER THE YEARS. FOR THESE GUYS OVER THE YEARS.>>THE ACTIONS THAT THESE>>THE ACTIONS THAT THESE INDIVIDUALS TAKE CONSTITUTE INDIVIDUALS TAKE CONSTITUTE MATERIAL SUPPORT FOR TERRORISM MATERIAL SUPPORT FOR TERRORISM BECAUSE THEY ARE TAKING STEPS TO BECAUSE THEY ARE TAKING STEPS TO ACT IN SUPPORT OF A DESIGNATED ACT IN SUPPORT OF A DESIGNATED TERRORISTS GROUP, ISIS, AL TERRORISTS GROUP, ISIS, AL QAEDA. QAEDA. THERE ISN’T AN ANALOGOUS THERE ISN’T AN ANALOGOUS SITUATION BECAUSE WE DON’T SITUATION BECAUSE WE DON’T DESIGNATE GROUPS IN THAT WAY. DESIGNATE GROUPS IN THAT WAY. THAT’S NOT JUST BECAUSE WE THAT’S NOT JUST BECAUSE WE HAVEN’T THOUGHT OF IT. HAVEN’T THOUGHT OF IT. IT’S BECAUSE IT’S FRAUGHT WITH IT’S BECAUSE IT’S FRAUGHT WITH POTENTIAL POLITICAL PERIL. POTENTIAL POLITICAL PERIL.>>THAT THING CALLED THE FIRST>>THAT THING CALLED THE FIRST AMENDMENT. AMENDMENT.>>AS FBI DIRECTOR WREY SAID>>AS FBI DIRECTOR WREY SAID THEY’RE NOT INTERESTED IN THEY’RE NOT INTERESTED IN POLICING POLITICAL SPEECH IN POLICING POLITICAL SPEECH IN FBI. FBI. THEY ARE INTERESTED IN WORKING THEY ARE INTERESTED IN WORKING THE PROBLEMS WHEN THEY START TO THE PROBLEMS WHEN THEY START TO APPROACH THE PROBLEM WHEN APPROACH THE PROBLEM WHEN VIOLENCE HAS BEEN THE VIOLENCE HAS BEEN THE FBI TO INVESTIGATE GROUPS FBI TO INVESTIGATE GROUPS PROACTIVELY IN THE DOMESTIC PROACTIVELY IN THE DOMESTIC TERRORISM SPHERE. TERRORISM SPHERE. THERE’S NEVER THIS MOMENT LIKE THERE’S NEVER THIS MOMENT LIKE THE ISSUE OF 24. THE ISSUE OF 24. THAT WAS BACK WHEN PEOPLE WERE THAT WAS BACK WHEN PEOPLE WERE TRYING TO MAKE THE CASE FOR TRYING TO MAKE THE CASE FOR TORTURE AT SOME POINT. TORTURE AT SOME POINT. THIS WAS A WEIRD INCIDENT IN THIS WAS A WEIRD INCIDENT IN THAT WE HAD 19 MINUTES. THAT WE HAD 19 MINUTES. WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE? WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE? IF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SAYS IF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SAYS WHAT LAWS DO WE NEED TO SUPPORT WHAT LAWS DO WE NEED TO SUPPORT THE ABILITY IN ORDER TO UNEARTH THE ABILITY IN ORDER TO UNEARTH THIS INDIVIDUAL? THIS INDIVIDUAL? DO WE NEED TO BACKTRACK THAT OR DO WE NEED TO BACKTRACK THAT OR IS OUR CONSTITUTION MAKES THAT IS OUR CONSTITUTION MAKES THAT IMPOSSIBLE? IMPOSSIBLE?>>I THINK IT MAKES IT>>I THINK IT MAKES IT DIFFICULT. DIFFICULT. I’M NOT WILLING TO POINT THE I’M NOT WILLING TO POINT THE FINGER. FINGER.>>IS THERE A POWER THAT THE>>IS THERE A POWER THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO HAVE. HAVE. I’M JUST ASKING. I’M JUST ASKING.>>OTHER COUNTRIES ARE GRAPPLING>>OTHER COUNTRIES ARE GRAPPLING WITH THIS PROBLEM TOO. WITH THIS PROBLEM TOO. THE AUSTRALIANS THAT SAYS ANY THE AUSTRALIANS THAT SAYS ANY SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANY THAT SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANY THAT DOESN’T TAKE DOWN MATERIAL THAT DOESN’T TAKE DOWN MATERIAL THAT SEEMS TO IMPLY VIOLENCE WILL BE SEEMS TO IMPLY VIOLENCE WILL BE SUBJECT TO FEDERAL PENALTY. SUBJECT TO FEDERAL PENALTY. IMAGINE DOING THAT IN OUR IMAGINE DOING THAT IN OUR SYSTEM. SYSTEM.>>THAT MEANS THE ACLU WOULD>>THAT MEANS THE ACLU WOULD HAVE A CLIENT. HAVE A CLIENT.>>THIS PENDULUM SWINGS BOTH>>THIS PENDULUM SWINGS BOTH WAYS. WAYS.>>ON ONE HAND WOULD BE LIKE WE>>ON ONE HAND WOULD BE LIKE WE WANT TO GIVE THE FEDERAL WANT TO GIVE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE POWER TO DO THIS GOVERNMENT THE POWER TO DO THIS AND WAIT WHAT IF THE FEDERAL AND WAIT WHAT IF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS A POLITICAL GOVERNMENT HAS A POLITICAL PERSUASION I DON’T LIKE. PERSUASION I DON’T LIKE.>>OR AN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP>>OR AN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP THAT SOME WOULD SEE AS ESPOUSING THAT SOME WOULD SEE AS ESPOUSING ECO TERRORISM.

15 thoughts on “Rasmussen: ‘Absolutely None Of My Time’ In Gov. Was Spent On Domestic Terrorism | MTP Daily | MSNBC

  1. Imagine for a second that the El Paso shooter was a member of ISIS.
    And not some white American dude.🤔
    Their motivations are no different.
    But you can bet your last dollar republicans would be hard as a rock over what to do next! 😄😆

  2. I'am not afraid of the Muslim bogeyman. I have travelled the world & have spent many a night in a peaceful Muslim village. I'am more worried about the White Nationalist Neo-Nazi in America sporting a 100 clip ammo round automatic weapon intent on a murderous rampage.

  3. It’s mislabeled It’s .deliberately mislabeled Both attacks are international terrorism because they both deliberate target citizens from a neighboring or a foreign country ( targeting tourists deliberately) Several Mexican tourists were killed deliberately and several attempted killed and a German citizen was executed in the Texas terror attack The Las Vegas attack was also international terrorism but because of the scale of the terrorism that attack was DELIBERATELY and mass abusively explained like this : “ We don’t know why almost why almost 1000 people were either executed or attempted executed “ People and countries who deliberately mislabel or mismanage terrorism enable terror acts and are terrorism participants who want to harm anybody and there is no excuses here just cold blooded execution of innocent civilians

  4. Please notice Trump's hair color changes to bright yellow when he's uncontrollable and off his meds.
    He's more irritable. / He's more paranoid.
    His lying increases / His empathy drops below his highest number zero.
    Let me add that Fox camera angle makes Trump look slender compared to the other networks. What's up with that?
    When he's on flip back-and-forth between channels and see slender physique then toad like mushroom head.

  5. We the American people need to take up arms and fight the domestic terrorists wherever they arise. Stop fearing the second amendment and embrace the right to end these racists before they end you.

  6. ONE SHOOTER IS ACTUALLY A DEMOCRAT WHO IS A HUGE FAN OF ELIZABETH WARREN – WE MUST NOW REMEMBER THAT ABOUT 2 YEARS AGO THE DEMON RATS PARTY ANNOUNCED TO THE COUNTRY THAT THEY FOSTER AND PROMOTE VIOLENCE AND DOMESTIC TERRORISM – REMEMBER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE WILL FLUSH THE MARXIST DEMON RATS DOWN THE TOILET IN 2020 WERE THEY REALLY BELONG – AGAIN MEGA,MEGA IN 2020

  7. Doesn't make sense at all.. White Nationalist and Muslim extremist have the same ideology! A terrorist is a terrorist no matter what land he was born on and terrorizing!! This is one of the DUMBEST things I've heard!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *