Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh | Wikipedia audio article

Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh | Wikipedia audio article


Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, abbreviated as
RSS (Rāṣṭrīya Svayamsēvaka Saṅgha, IPA: [rɑːʂˈʈriːj(ə) swəjəmˈseːvək
ˈsəŋɡʱ], lit. “National Volunteer Organisation” or “National Patriotic Organisation”), is
an Indian right-wing, Hindu nationalist, Hindu supremacist paramilitary volunteer organisation.
It is widely regarded as the parent organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party which is currently
heading the Government of India. The RSS is one of the principal organizations of the
Sangh Parivar group. Founded on 27 September 1925, it claimed a commitment to selfless
service to India. The organisation is the world’s largest voluntary missionary organization.The
initial impetus was to provide character training through Hindu discipline and to unite the
Hindu community to form a Hindu Rashtra (Hindu nation). The organisation promotes the ideals
of upholding Indian culture and the values of a civil society and propagates the ideology
of Hindutva, to “strengthen” the majority Hindu community. It drew initial inspiration
from European right-wing groups during World War II. Gradually, RSS grew into a prominent
Hindu nationalist umbrella organisation, spawning several affiliated organisations that established
numerous schools, charities, and clubs to spread its ideological beliefs.The RSS was
banned once during British rule, and then thrice by the post-independence Indian government
– first in 1948 when a former RSS member assassinated Mahatma Gandhi; then during the
emergency (1975–77); and for a third time after the demolition of Babri Masjid in 1992.==Founding==RSS was founded in 1925 by Keshav Baliram
Hedgewar, a doctor in the city of Nagpur, British India.Hedgewar was a political protege
of B. S. Moonje, a Tilakite Congressman, Hindu Mahasabha politician and social activist from
Nagpur. Moonje had sent Hedgewar to Calcutta to pursue his medical studies and to learn
terrorist techniques from the revolutionary secret societies of the Bengalis. Hedgewar
became a member of the Anushilan Samiti, an anti-British revolutionary group, getting
into its inner circle. The secretive methods of these societies were eventually used by
him in organising the RSS.After returning to Nagpur, Hedgewar organized anti-British
activities through the Kranti Dal (Party of Revolution) and participated in Tilak’s Home
Rule campaign in 1918. According to the official RSS history, he came to realize that revolutionary
activities alone were not enough to overthrow the British. After reading V. D. Savarkar’s
Hindutva, published in Nagpur in 1923, and meeting Savarkar in the Ratnagiri prison in
1925, Hedgewar was extremely influenced by him, and he founded the RSS with the objective
of strengthening the Hindu society. Hedgewar believed that a handful of British
were able to rule over the vast country of India because Hindus were disunited, lacked
valour (pararkram) and lacked a civic character. He recruited energetic Hindu youth with revolutionary
fervour, gave them a uniform of a black forage cap, khaki shirt (later white shirt) and khaki
shorts—emulating the British police—and taught them paramilitary techniques with lathi
(bamboo staff), sword, javelin and dagger. Hindu ceremonies and rituals played a large
role in the organisation, not so much for religious observance, but to provide awareness
of India’s glorious past and to bind the members in a religious communion. Hedgewar also held
weekly sessions of what he called baudhik (idealogical education), consisting of simple
questions to the novices concerning the Hindu nation and its history and heroes, especially
Shivaji. The saffron flag of Shivaji, the Bhagwa Dhwaj, was used as the emblem for the
new organisation. Its public tasks involved protecting Hindu pilgrims at festivals and
confronting Muslim resistance against Hindu processions near mosques.Two years into the
life of the organisation, in 1927, Hedgewar organised an “Officers’ Training Camp” with
the objective of forming a corps of key workers, whom he called pracharaks. He asked the volunteers
to become sadhus first, renouncing professional and family lives and dedicating themselves
to the cause of the RSS. According to scholar Christophe Jaffrelot, Hedgewar embraced this
doctrine after it had been reinterpreted by nationalists such as Aurobindo. The tradition
of renunciation gave the RSS the character of a `Hindu sect’. Development of the shakha
network of the RSS was the main preoccupation for Hedgewar throughout his career as the
RSS chief. The first pracharaks were responsible for establishing as many shakhas as possible,
first in Nagpur, then across Maharashtra and eventually in the rest of India. P. B. Dani
was sent to establish a shakha at the Benaras Hindu University and other Universities were
similarly targeted to recruit new followers among the student population. Three pracharaks
went to Punjab: Appaji Joshi to Sialkot, Moreshwar Munje to the DAV College in Rawalpindi and
Raja Bhau Paturkar to the DAV College in Lahore. In 1940, Madhavrao Muley was appointed as
the prant pracharak (regional missionary) in Lahore.==Motivations==
Scholars differ on Hedgewar’s motivations for forming the RSS, especially because he
never involved the RSS in fighting the British rule. Jaffrelot says that the RSS was intended
to propagate the ideology of Hindutva and to provide “new physical strength” to the
majority community. An alternative interpretation is that he formed it to fight the Indian Muslims.===Tilakite ideology===
After Tilak’s demise in 1920, like other followers of Tilak in Nagpur, Hedgewar was opposed to
some of the programmes adopted by Gandhi. Gandhi’s stance on the Khilafat issue was
a cause for concern to Hedgewar, and so was the fact that the ‘cow protection’ was not
on the Congress agenda. This led Hedgewar, along with other Tilakities, to part ways
with Gandhi. In 1921, Hedgewar delivered a series of lectures in Maharashtra with slogans
such as “Freedom within a year” and “boycott”. He deliberately broke the law, for which he
was imprisoned for a year. After being released in 1922, Hedgewar was distressed at the lack
of organisation among the Congress volunteers for the independence struggle. Without proper
mobilisation and organisation, he felt that the patriotic youth of the country could never
get independence for the country. Subsequently, he felt the need to create an independent
organisation that was based on the country’s traditions and history.===Hindu-Muslim relations===
The decade of 1920’s witnessed a significant deterioration in the relations between Hindus
and Muslims. The Muslim masses were mobilised by the Khilafat movement, demanding the reinstatement
of the Caliphate in Turkey, and Gandhi made an alliance with it for conducting his own
Non-cooperation movement. Gandhi aimed to create Hindu-Muslim unity in forming the alliance.
However, the alliance saw a “common enemy”, not a “common enmity”. When Gandhi called
off the Non-cooperation movement due to outbreaks of violence, Muslims disagreed with his strategy.
Once the movements failed, the mobilised Muslims turned their anger towards Hindus. The first
major incident of religious violence was the Moplah rebellion in August 1921, which ended
in a large-scale violence against Hindus and their displacement in Malabar. A cycle of
inter-communal violence throughout India followed for several years. In 1923, there were riots
in Nagpur, called “Muslim riots” by Hedgewar, where Hindus were felt to be “totally disorganized
and panicky.” These incidents made a major impression on Hedgewar and convinced him of
the need to organize the Hindu society.After acquiring about 100 swayamsevaks (volunteers)
to the RSS in 1927, Hedgewar took the issue to the Muslim domain. He led the Hindu religious
procession for Ganesha, beating the drums in defiance of the usual practice not to pass
in front of a mosque with music. On the day of Lakshmi Puja on 4 September, Muslims are
said to have retaliated. When the Hindu procession reached a mosque in the Mahal area of Nagpur,
Muslims blocked it. Later in the afternoon, they attacked the Hindu residences in the
Mahal area. It is said that the RSS cadres were prepared for the attack and beat the
Muslim rioters back. Riots continued for 3 days and the army had to be called in to quell
the violence. RSS organized the Hindu resistance and protected the Hindu households while the
Muslim households had to leave Nagpur en masse for safety. Basu et al. note the accounts
of “Muslim aggressiveness” and the “Hindu self-defence” in the RSS descriptions of the
incident. The above incident vastly enhanced the prestige of the RSS and enabled its subsequent
expansion.===Stigmatisation and emulation===
Christophe Jaffrelot points out the theme of “stigmatisation and emulation” in the ideology
of the RSS along with other Hindu nationalist movements such as the Arya Samaj and the Hindu
Mahasabha. Muslims, Christians and the British were thought of as “foreign bodies” implanted
in the Hindu nation, who were able to exploit the disunity and absence of valour among the
Hindus in order to subdue them. The solution lay in emulating the characteristics of these
“Threatening Others” that were perceived to give them strength, such as paramilitary organisation,
emphasis on unity and nationalism. The Hindu nationalists combined these emulatory aspects
with a selective borrowing of traditions from the Hindu past to achieve a synthesis that
was uniquely Indian and Hindu.===Hindu Mahasabha influence===
The Hindu Mahasabha, which was initially a special interest group within the Indian National
Congress and later an independent party, was an important influence on the RSS, even though
it is rarely acknowledged. In 1923, prominent Hindu leaders like Madan Mohan Malaviya met
together on this platform and voiced their concerns on the ‘division in the Hindu community’.
In his presidential speech to Mahasabha, Malaviya stated: “Friendship could exist between equals.
If the Hindus made themselves strong and the rowdy section among the Mahomedans were convinced
they could not safely rob and dishonour Hindus, unity would be established on a stable basis.”
He wanted the activists ‘to educate all boys and girls, establish akharas (gymnasiums),
establish a volunteer corps to persuade people to comply with decisions of the Hindu Mahasabha,
to accept untouchables as Hindus and grant them the right to use wells, enter temples,
get an education.’ Later, Hindu Mahasabha leader V. D. Savarkar’s ‘Hindutva’ ideology
also had a profound impact on Hedgewar’s thinking about the ‘Hindu nation’.The initial meeting
for the formation of the Sangh on the Vijaya Dashami day of 1925 was held between Hedgewar
and four Hindu Mahasabha leaders: B. S. Moonje, Ganesh Savarkar, L. V. Paranjpe and B. B.
Tholkar. RSS took part as a volunteer force in organising the Hindu Mahasabha annual meeting
in Akola in 1931. Moonje remained a patron of the RSS throughout his life. Both he and
Ganesh Savarkar worked to spread the RSS shakhas in Maharashtra, Panjab, Delhi and the princely
states by initiating contacts with local leaders. Savarkar merged his own youth organisation
Tarun Hindu Sabha with the RSS and helped its expansion. V. D. Savarkar, after his release
in 1937, joined them in spreading the RSS and giving speeches in its support. Officials
in the Home Department called the RSS the “volunteer organisation of the Hindu Mahasabha.”==History=====
Indian Independence Movement===After the formation of the RSS, which portrays
itself as a social movement, Hedgewar kept the organisation from having any direct affiliation
with the political organisations then fighting British rule, RSS rejected Gandhi’s willingness
to cooperate with the Muslims.In accordance with the Hedgewar’s tradition of keeping the
RSS away from the Indian Independence movement, any political activity that could be construed
as being anti-British was carefully avoided. According to the RSS biographer C. P. Bhishikar,
Hedgewar talked only about Hindu organisations and avoided any direct comment on the Government.
The “Independence Day” announced by the Indian National Congress for 26 January 1930 was
celebrated by the RSS that year but was subsequently avoided. The Tricolor of the Indian national
movement was shunned. Hedgewar personally participated in the ‘Satyagraha’
launched by Gandhi in April 1930, but he did not get the RSS involved in the movement.
He sent information everywhere that the RSS would not participate in the Satyagraha. However,
those wishing to participate individually were not prohibited. In 1934 Congress passed
a resolution prohibiting its members from joining RSS, Hindu Mahasabha, or the Muslim
League. M. S. Golwalkar, who became the leader of
the RSS in 1940, continued and further strengthened the isolation from the independence movement.
In his view, the RSS had pledged to achieve freedom through “defending religion and culture”,
not by fighting the British. Golwalkar lamented the anti-British nationalism, calling it a
“reactionary view” that he claimed, had disastrous effects upon the entire course of the freedom
struggle. It is believed that Golwalkar did not want to give the British an excuse to
ban the RSS. He complied with all the strictures imposed by the Government during the Second
World War, even announcing the termination of the RSS military department. The British
Government believed that the RSS was not supporting any civil disobedience against them, and their
other political activities could thus be overlooked. The British Home Department took note of the
fact that the speakers at the RSS meetings urged the members to keep aloof from the anti-British
movements of the Indian National Congress, which was duly followed.The Home Department
did not see the RSS as a problem for law and order in British India.The Bombay government
appreciated the RSS by noting that the Sangh had scrupulously kept itself within the law
and refrained from taking part in the disturbances (Quit India Movement) that broke out in August
1942. It also reported that the RSS had not, in any way, infringed upon government orders
and had always shown a willingness to comply with the law. The Bombay Government report
further noted that in December 1940, orders had been issued to the provincial RSS leaders
to desist from any activities that the British Government considered objectionable, and the
RSS, in turn, had assured the British authorities that “it had no intentions of offending against
the orders of the Government”.Golwalkar later openly admitted the fact that the RSS did
not participate in the Quit India Movement. He agreed that such a stance led to a perception
of the RSS as an inactive organisation, whose statements had no substance in reality.The
RSS neither supported nor joined in the Royal Indian Navy Mutiny against the British in
1945.===World War II===
During World War II, the RSS leaders openly admired Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini.
Golwalkar took inspiration from Adolf Hitler’s ideology of racial purity. This did not imply
any antipathy towards Jews. The RSS leaders were supportive of the Jewish State of Israel,
including Savarkar himself. Golwalkar admired the Jews for maintaining their “religion,
culture and language”.===Partition===
The Partition of India affected millions of Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims attempting to escape
the violence and carnage that followed. During the partition, the RSS helped the Hindu refugees
fleeing West Punjab; and its activists also played an active role in the communal violence
during Hindu-Muslim riots in North India, though this was officially not sanctioned
by the leadership. To the RSS activists, the partition was a result of mistaken soft-line
towards the Muslims, which only confirmed the natural moral weaknesses and corruptibility
of the politicians. The RSS blamed Gandhi, Nehru and Patel for their ‘naivety which resulted
in the partition’, and held them responsible for the mass killings and displacement of
the millions of people.===First ban===
The first ban on the RSS was imposed in Punjab Province (British India) on 24 January 1947
by Malik Khizar Hayat Tiwana, the premier of the ruling Unionist Party, a party that
represented the interests of the landed gentry and landlords of Punjab, which included Muslims,
Hindus, and Sikhs. Along with the RSS, the Muslim National Guard was also banned. The
ban was lifted on 28 January 1947.===Opposition to the National Flag of India
===The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh initially
did not recognise the Tricolor as the National Flag of India. The RSS -inspired publication,
the Organiser, demanded, in an editorial titled “National Flag”, that the Bhagwa Dhwaj (Saffron
Flag) be adopted as the National Flag of India. After the Tricolor was adopted as the National
Flag by the Constituent Assembly of India on 22 July 1947, the Organiser viciously attacked
the Tricolor and the Constituent Assembly’s decision. In an article titled “Mystery behind
the Bhagwa Dhwaj”, the Organiser stated The people who have come to power by the kick
of fate may give in our hands the Tricolor but it [will] never be respected and owned
by Hindus. The word three is in itself an evil, and a flag having three colours will
certainly produce a very bad psychological effect and is injurious to a country.
In an essay titled “Drifting and Drafting” published in Bunch of Thoughts, Golwalkar
lamented the choice of the Tricolor as the National Flag, and compared it to an intellectual
vacuum/void. In his words, Our leaders have set up a new flag for the country. Why did
they do so? It just is a case of drifting and imitating…Ours is an ancient and great
nation with a glorious past. Then, had we no flag of our own? Had we no national emblem
at all these thousands of years? Undoubtedly we had. Then why this utter void, this utter
vacuum in our minds. The RSS hoisted the National Flag of India
at its Nagpur headquarters only twice, on 14 August 1947 and on 26 January 1950, but
stopped doing so after that. This issue has always been a source of controversy. In 2001
three activists of Rashtrapremi Yuwa Dal – president Baba Mendhe, and members Ramesh Kalambe and
Dilip Chattani, along with others – allegedly entered the RSS headquarters in Reshimbagh,
Nagpur, on 26 January, the Republic Day of India, and forcibly hoisted the national flag
there amid patriotic slogans. They contended that the RSS had never before or after independence,
ever hoisted the tri-colour in their premises. Offences were registered by the Bombay Police
against the trio, who were then jailed. They were discharged by the court of Justice R.
R. Lohia after eleven years in 2013. The arrests and the flag-hoisting issue stoked a controversy,
which was raised in the Parliament as well. Hoisting of flag was very restrictive till
the formation of Flag code of India 2002. Subsequently, in 2002 the National Flag was
raised in the RSS headquarters on the occasion of Republic Day for the first time in 52 years.===Opposition to the Constitution of India
===The Rashtriya Swaysevak Sangh initially did
not recognize the Constitution of India, strongly criticising it because the Indian Constitution
made no mention of “Manu’s laws” – from the ancient Hindu text Manusmriti. When the
Constituent Assembly finalized the constitution, the RSS mouthpiece, the Organiser, complained
in an editorial dated 30 November 1949:But in our constitution, there is no mention of
that unique constitutional development in ancient Bharat… To this day his laws as
enunciated in the Manusmriti excite the admiration of the world and elicit spontaneous obedience
and conformity. But to our constitutional pundits that means nothing” The Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh did not stop its unrelenting attacks on this issue, and criticised B. R.
Ambedkar’s public pronouncements that the new constitution would give equality to all
castes. On 6 February 1950 the Organizer carried another article, titled “Manu Rules our Hearts”,
written by a retired High Court Judge named Sankar Subba Aiyar, that reaffirmed their
support for the Manusmriti as the final lawgiving authority for Hindus, rather than the Constitution
of India. It stated:Even though Dr. Ambedkar is reported to have recently stated in Bombay
that the days of Manu have ended it is nevertheless a fact that the daily lives of Hindus are
even at present-day affected by the principles and injunctions contained in the Manusmrithi
and other Smritis. Even an unorthodox Hindu feels himself bound at least in some matters
by the rules contained in the Smrithis and he feels powerless to give up altogether his
adherence to them. The RSS’ opposition to, and vitriolic attacks against, the Constitution
of India continued post-independence. In 1966 Golwalkar, in his book titled Bunch of Thoughts
asserted:Our Constitution too is just a cumbersome and heterogeneous piecing together of various
articles from various Constitutions of Western countries. It has absolutely nothing, which
can be called our own. Is there a single word of reference in its guiding principles as
to what our national mission is and what our keynote in life is? No!”===Second ban and acquittal===
Following Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination in January 1948 by a former member of the RSS,
Nathuram Godse, many prominent leaders of the RSS were arrested, and RSS as an organisation
was banned on 4 February 1948. A Commission of Inquiry into Conspiracy to the murder of
Gandhi was set, and its report was published by India’s Ministry of Home Affairs in the
year 1970. Accordingly, the Justice Kapur Commission noted that the “RSS as such were
not responsible for the murder of Mahatma Gandhi, meaning thereby that one could not
name the organisation as such as being responsible for that most diabolical crime, the murder
of the apostle of peace. It has not been proved that they (the accused) were members of the
RSS.” However, the then Indian Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister, Sardar Vallabhai
Patel had remarked that the “RSS men expressed joy and distributed sweets after Gandhi’s
death”.RSS leaders were acquitted of the conspiracy charge by the Supreme Court of India. Following
his release in August 1948, Golwalkar wrote to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru to lift
the ban on RSS. After Nehru replied that the matter was the responsibility of the Home
Minister, Golwalkar consulted Vallabhai Patel regarding the same. Patel then demanded an
absolute pre-condition that the RSS adopt a formal written constitution and make it
public, where Patel expected RSS to pledge its loyalty to the Constitution of India,
accept the Tricolor as the National Flag of India, define the power of the head of the
organisation, make the organisation democratic by holding the internal elections, authorisation
of their parents before enrolling the pre-adolescents into the movement, and to renounce violence
and secrecy. Golwalkar launched a huge agitation against this demand during which he was imprisoned
again. Later, a constitution was drafted for RSS, which, however, initially did not meet
any of the Patel’s demands. After a failed attempt to agitate again, eventually the RSS’s
constitution was amended according to Patel’s wishes with the exception of procedure for
selecting the head of the organisation and the enrollment of pre-adolescents. However,
the organisation’s internal democracy which was written into its constitution, remained
a ‘dead letter’.On 11 July 1949 the Government of India lifted the ban on the RSS by issuing
a communique stating that the decision to lift the ban on the RSS had been taken in
view of the RSS leader Golwalkar’s undertaking to make the group’s loyalty towards the Constitution
of India and acceptance and respect towards the National Flag of India more explicit in
the Constitution of the RSS, which was to be worked out in a democratic manner.===Decolonisation of Dadra, Nagar Haveli,
and Goa===After India had achieved independence, the
RSS was one of the socio-political organisations that supported and participated in movements
to decolonise Dadra and Nagar Haveli, which at that time was ruled by Portugal. In early
1954 volunteers Raja Wakankar and Nana Kajrekar of the RSS visited the area round about Dadra,
Nagar Haveli, and Daman several times to study the topography and get acquainted with locals
who wanted the area to change from being a Portuguese colony to being an Indian union
territory. In April 1954 the RSS formed a coalition with the National Movement Liberation
Organisation (NMLO), and the Azad Gomantak Dal (AGD) for the annexation of Dadra and
Nagar Haveli into the Republic of India. On the night of 21 July, United Front of Goans,
a group working independently of the coalition, captured the Portuguese police station at
Dadra and declared Dadra independent. Subsequently, on 28 July, volunteer teams from the RSS and
AGD captured the territories of Naroli and Phiparia and ultimately the capital of Silvassa.
The Portuguese forces that had escaped and moved towards Nagar Haveli, were assaulted
at Khandvel and forced to retreat until they surrendered to the Indian border police at
Udava on 11 August 1954. A native administration was set up with Appasaheb Karmalkar of the
NMLO as the Administrator of Dadra and Nagar Haveli on 11 August 1954.The capture of Dadra
and Nagar Haveli gave a boost to the movement against Portuguese colonial rule in the Indian
subcontinent. In 1955 RSS leaders demanded the end of Portuguese rule in Goa and its
integration into India. When Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru refused to provide an armed
intervention, RSS leader Jagannath Rao Joshi led the Satyagraha agitation straight into
Goa. He was imprisoned with his followers by the Portuguese police. The nonviolent protests
continued but met with repression. On 15 August 1955, the Portuguese police opened fire on
the satyagrahis, killing thirty or so civilians.Goa was later annexed into the Indian union in
1961 through an army operation, code named ‘Operation Vijay’, that was carried out by
the Nehru government.===War-time activities===
After the declaration of 1971 Bangladesh War of Independence by Indira Gandhi, RSS provided
support to the government, by offering its services to maintain law and order in Delhi
and its volunteers were apparently the first to donate blood.===Movement against the Emergency===
In 1975 the Indira Gandhi government proclaimed emergency rule in India, thereby suspending
fundamental rights and curtailing the freedom of the press. This action was taken after
the Supreme Court of India cancelled her election to the Indian Parliament on charges of malpractices
in the election. Democratic institutions were suspended and prominent opposition leaders
including Gandhian Jayaprakash Narayan, were arrested whilst thousands of people were detained
without any charges taken up against them. RSS, which was seen as being close to opposition
leaders, and with its large organisational base was seen to have the capability of organising
protests against the government, was also banned.Deoras, the then chief of RSS, wrote
letters to Indira Gandhi, promising her to extend the organisation’s co-operation in
return for the lifting of the ban, asserting that RSS had no connection with the movement
in Bihar and that in Gujarat. He tried to persuade Vinoba Bhave to mediate between the
RSS and the government and also sought the offices of Sanjay Gandhi, the Indira Gandhi’s
son. Later, when there was no response, volunteers of the RSS formed underground movements against
the emergency. Literature that was censored in the media was clandestinely published and
distributed on a large scale, and funds were collected for the movement. Networks were
established between leaders of different political parties in the jail and outside for the coordination
of the movement. RSS claimed that the movement was “dominated by tens of thousands of RSS
cadres, though more and more young recruits are coming”. Talking about its objectives,
RSS said, “its platform at the moment has only one plank: to bring democracy back to
India”. The Emergency was lifted in 1977, and as a consequence the ban on the RSS was
also lifted. The emergency is said to have legitimized
the role of RSS in Indian politics, which had not been possible ever since the stain
the organisation had acquired following the Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination in 1948, thereby
‘sowing the seeds’ for the Hindutva politics of the following decade.==Involvement in politics==
Several Sangh Parivar politicians such as Balraj Madhok in the 1960s and 1970s to the
BJP leaders like L. K. Advani have complained about the RSS’s interference in party politics.
Though some former Hindu nationalists believed that Sangh should take part in politics, they
failed to draw the RSS, which was intended to be a purely cultural movement, into the
political arena until the 1950s. Savarkar tried to convince Hedgewar and later Golwalkar,
to tie up with Hindu Mahasabha, but failed to do so.
Under pressure from other swayamsevaks, Golwalkar gradually changed his mind after independence
under unusual circumstances during the ban on RSS in 1948 after the assassination of
Gandhi. After the first wave of arrests of RSS activists at that time, some of its members
who had gone underground recommended that their movement be involved in politics, seeing
that no political force was present to advocate the cause of RSS in parliament or anywhere
else. One such member who significantly suggested this cause was K.R. Malkani, who wrote in
1949: “Sangh must take part in politics not only to protect itself against the greedy
design of politicians, but to stop the un-Bharatiya and anti-Bharatiya policies of the Government
and to advance and expedite the cause of Bharatiya through state machinery side by side with
official effort in the same direction. […] Sangh must continue as it is, an ashram for the
national cultural education of the entire citizenry, but it must develop a political
wing for the more effective and early achievement of its ideals.”Golwalkar approved of the Malkani’s
and others’ views regarding the formation of a new party in 1950. Jaffrelot says that
the death of Sardar Patel influenced this change since Golwalkar opined that Patel could
have transformed the Congress party by emphasizing its affinities with Hindu nationalism, while
after Patel, Nehru became strong enough to impose his ‘anti-communal’ line within his
party. Accordingly, Golwalkar met Syama Prasad Mukherjee and agreed for endorsing senior
swayamsevaks, who included Deendayal Upadhyaya, Balraj Madhok and Atal Bihari Vajpayee, to
the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, a newly formed political party by Mukherjee. These men, who took their
orders in Nagpur, captured power in the party after Mookerjee’s death.Balasaheb Deoras,
who succeeded Golwalkar as the chief of RSS, got very much involved in politics. In 1965,
when he was the general secretary of the RSS, he addressed the annual meeting of Jana Sangh,
which is seen as an “unprecedented move” by an RSS dignitary that reflected his strong
interest in politics and his will to make the movement play a larger part in the public
sphere. Jaffrelot says that he exemplified the specific kind of swayamsevaks known as
‘activists’, giving expression to his leanings towards political activism by having the RSS
support the JP Movement. The importance that RSS began to give to the electoral politics
is demonstrated when its units (shakhas) were made constituency-based in the early 1970s,
from which the RSS shakhas began to involve directly in elections, not only of legislatures,
but also of trade unions, student and cultural organisations.As soon as the RSS men took
over the Jana Sangh party, the Hindu traditionalists who previously joined the party because of
S.P. Mookerjee were sidelined. The organisation of the party was restructured and all its
organisational secretaries, who were the pillars of the party, came from the RSS, both at the
district and state level. The party also took the vision of RSS in its mission, where its
ultimate objective in the long run was the reform of society, but not the conquest of
power, since the ‘state’ was not viewed as a prominent institution. Hence the Jana Sangh
initially remained reluctant to join any alliance that was not fully in harmony with its ideology.
In 1962, Deendayal Upadhyaya, who was then party’s chief, explained this approach by
saying that “coalitions were bound to degenerate into a struggle for power by opportunist elements
coming together in the interest of expediency”. He wanted to build the party as an alternative
party to the Congress and saw the elections as an ‘opportunity to educate the people
on political issues and to challenge the right of the Congress to be in power.’ Jaffrelot
says that this indifferent approach of party politics was in accordance with its lack of
interest in the ‘state’ and the wish to make it weaker, or more decentralized. After India’s
defeat in the 1962 Sino Indian war, the RSS and other right-wing forces in India were
strengthened since the left and centrist opinion, sometimes even Nehru himself, could then be
blamed for being ‘soft’ towards China. The RSS and Jana Sangh also took complete advantage
of the 1965 war with Pakistan to ‘deepen suspicion about Muslims’, and also en-cashed the growing
unpopularity of Congress, particularly in the Hindi-belt, where a left-wing alternative
was weak or non-existent. The major themes on the party’s agenda during this period were
banning cow slaughter, abolishing the special status given to Jammu and Kashmir and legislating
a uniform civil code. Explaining the Jana Sangh’s failure to become a major political
force despite claiming to represent the national interests of the Hindus, scholar Bruce Desmond
Graham states that the party’s close initial ties with the Hindi-belt and its preoccupation
with the issues of North India such as promotion of Hindi, energetic resistance to Pakistan
etc., had become a serious disadvantage to the party in the long run. He also adds that
its interpretation of Hinduism was ‘restrictive and exclusive’, arguing that “its doctrines
were inspired by an activist version of Hindu nationalism and, indirectly, by the values
of Brahmanism rather than the devotional and quietist values of popular Hinduism.” Desmond
says, if the Jana Sangh had carefully moderated its Hindu nationalism, it could have been
able to well-exploit any strong increase in support for the traditional and nationalist
Hindu opinion, and hence to compete on equal terms with the Congress in the northern states.
He also remarks that if it had adopted a less harsh attitude towards Pakistan and Muslims,
“it would have been much more acceptable to Hindu traditionalists in the central and southern
states, where partition had left fewer emotional scars.”The Jana Sangh started making alliances
by entering the anti-Congress coalitions since 1960s. It became part of the 1971 Grand Alliance
and finally merged itself with the Janata Party in 1977. The success of Janata Party
in 1977 elections made the RSS members central ministers for the first time (Vajpayee, Advani
and Brij Lal Verma), and provided the RSS with an opportunity to avail the state and
its instruments to further its ends, through the resources of various state governments
as well as the central government. However, this merge, which was seen as a dilution of
its original doctrine, was viewed by the ex-Jana Sanghis as submersion of their initial identity.
Meanwhile, the other components of the Janata Party denounced the allegiance the ex-Jana
Sanghis continued to pay to the RSS. This led to a ‘dual membership’ controversy, regarding
the links the former Jana Sangh members were retaining with the RSS, and it led to the
split of Janata Party in 1979.The former Jana Sangh elements formed a new party, Bharatiya
Janata Party (BJP), in 1980. However, BJP originated more as a successor to the Janata
Party and did not return to the beginning stages of the Hindu nationalist identity and
Jana Sangh doctrines. The RSS resented this dilution of ideology — the new slogans promoted
by the then BJP president Vajpayee like ‘Gandhian socialism’ and ‘positive secularism’.
By early 1980s, RSS is said to have established its political strategy of “never keeping all
its eggs in one basket”. It even decided to support Congress in some states, for instance
to create the Hindu Munnani in Tamil Nadu in the backdrop of the 1981 Meenakshipuram
conversion, and to support one of its offshoots, Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), to launch an
enthno-religious movement on the Ayodhya dispute. BJP did not have much electoral success in
its initial years and was able to win only two seats in the 1984 elections. After L.K.
Advani replaced Vajpayee as party president in 1986, the BJP also began to rally around
the Ayodhya campaign. In 1990, the party organised the Ram Rath Yatra to advance this campaign
in large-scale. Advani also attacked the then ruling Congress party with the slogans such
as ‘pseudo secularism’, accusing Congress of misusing secularism for the political appeasement
of minorities, and established an explicit and unambiguous path of Hindu revival.The
‘instrumentalization’ of the Ayodhya issue and the related communal riots which polarised
the electorate along religious lines helped the BJP make good progress in the subsequent
elections of 1989, 1991 and 1996. However, in the mid-1990s, BJP adopted a more moderate
approach to politics in order to make allies. Jaffrelot remarks, it was because the party
realised during then that it would not be in a position to form the government on its
own in near future. In 1998, it built a major coalition, National Democratic Alliance (NDA),
in the Lok Sabha and succeeded in the general election in 1998, and was able to succeed
again in the mid-term elections of 1999, with Vajpayee as their Prime Ministerial candidate.
Though the RSS and other Sangh Parivar components appreciated some of the steps taken by the
Vajpayee government, like the testing of a nuclear bomb, they felt disappointed with
the government’s overall performance. The fact that no solid step was taken towards
building the Ram temple in Ayodhya was resented by the VHP. The liberalization policy of the
government faced objection from the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, a trade union controlled by
the RSS. Jaffrelot says, RSS and the other Sangh Parivar elements had come to the view
that the “BJP leaders had been victims of their thirst for power: they had preferred
to compromise to remain in office instead of sticking to their principles.”After the
end of Vajpayee’s tenure in 2004, BJP remained as a major opposition party in the subsequent
years, and again in the year 2014, the NDA came to power after BJP gained an overwhelming
majority in the 2014 general elections, with Narendra Modi, a former RSS member who previously
served as Gujarat’s chief minister for three tenures, as their prime ministerial candidate.
Modi was able to project himself as a person who could bring about “development”, without
focus on any specific policies, through the “Gujarat development model” which was frequently
used to counter the allegations of communalism. Voter dissatisfaction with the Congress, as
well as the support from RSS are also stated as reasons for the BJP’s success in the 2014
elections.==Structure==RSS does not have any formal membership. According
to the official website,men and boys can become members by joining the nearest shakha, which
is the basic unit. Although the RSS claims not to keep membership
records, it is estimated to have 2.5 to 6.0 million members in 2001.===Sarsanghchalaks===The Sarsanghchalak is the head of the RSS
organisation; the position is decided through nomination by the predecessor. The individuals
who have held the post of Sarsanghchalak in this organisation are: K. B. Hedgewar (1925–1930. 1931–1940)
Laxman Vaman Paranjpe (1930–1931) M. S. Golwalkar (1940–1973)
Madhukar Dattatraya Deoras (1973–1993) Rajendra Singh (1993–2000)
K. S. Sudarshan (2000–2009) Mohan Bhagwat (incumbent since 21 March 2009)===Shakhas===The term shakha is Hindi for “branch”. Most
of the organisational work of the RSS is done through the coordination of the variousshakhas,
or branches. These shakhas are run for one hour in public places. The number of shakhas
increased from 8500 in 1975 to 11,000 in 1977, and became 20,000 by 1982. In 2004 more than
51,000 shakhas were run throughout India. The number of shakas had fallen by over 10,000
since the fall of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government in 2004. However, by
mid-2014, the number had again increased to about 40,000 after the return of BJP to power
in Delhi in the same year. This number stood at 51,335 in August 2015.The shakhas conduct
various activities for its volunteers such as physical fitness through yoga, exercises,
and games, and activities that encourage civic awareness, social service, community living,
and patriotism. Volunteers are trained in first aid and in rescue and rehabilitation
operations, and are encouraged to become involved in community development.Most of the shakhas
are located in the Hindi-speaking regions. As of 2016 Delhi had 1,898 shakhas. There
are more than 8,000 shakhas in UP, 5,000+ in Kerala, 4,000 in Maharashtra, and around
1,000 in Gujarat. In northeast India, there are more than 1,000 shakhas, including 903
in Assam, 107 in Manipur, 36 in Arunachal, and 4 in Nagaland. In Punjab, there are more
than 900 shakhas as of 2016. As of late 2015 there were a total of 1,421 shakhas in Bihar,
4,870 in Rajasthan, 1,252 in Uttarakhand, and 1,492 in West Bengal. There are close
to 500 shakhas in Jammu and Kashmir, 130 in Tripura, and 46 in Meghalaya.As per the RSS
Annual Report of 2018, there were a total of 58,967 shakhas within India (in 2017, 57165
shakhas and 56,569 in 2016).==Mission==
Golwalkar describes the mission of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh as the revitalisation of
the Indian value system based on universalism and peace and prosperity to all. Vasudhaiva
Kutumbakam, the worldview that the whole world is one family, propounded by the ancient thinkers
of India, is considered as one of the ideologies of the organisation.But the immediate focus,
the leaders believe, is on the Hindu renaissance, which would build an egalitarian society and
a strong India that could propound this philosophy. Hence, the focus is on social reform, economic
upliftment of the downtrodden, and the protection of the cultural diversity of the natives in
India. The organisation says it aspires to unite all Hindus and build a strong India
that can contribute to the welfare of the world. In the words of RSS ideologue and the
second head of the RSS, Golwalkar, “in order to be able to contribute our unique knowledge
to mankind, in order to be able to live and strive for the unity and welfare of the world,
we stand before the world as a self-confident, resurgent and mighty nation”.In Vichardhara
(ideology), Golwalkar affirms the RSS mission of integration as:
RSS has been making determined efforts to inculcate in our people the burning devotion
for Bharat and its national ethos; kindle in them the spirit of dedication and sterling
qualities and character; rouse social consciousness, mutual good-will, love and cooperation among
them all; to make them realise that casts, creeds and languages are secondary and that
service to the nation is the supreme end and to mold their behaviour accordingly; instill
in them a sense of true humility and discipline and train their bodies to be strong and robust
so as to shoulder any social responsibility; and thus to create all-round Anushasana in
all walks of life and build together all our people into a unified harmonious national
whole, extending from Himalayas to Kanyakumari. Golwalkar and Balasaheb Deoras, the second
and third supreme leaders of the RSS, spoke against the caste system, though they did
not support its abolition.Golwalkar also explains that RSS does not intend to compete in electioneering
politics or share power. The movement considers Hindus as inclusive of Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists,
tribals, untouchables, Veerashaivism, Arya Samaj, Ramakrishna Mission, and other groups
as a community, a view similar to the inclusive referencing of the term Hindu in the Indian
Constitution Article 25 (2)(b).When it came to non-Hindu religions, the view of Golwalkar
(who once supported Hitler’s creation of a supreme race by suppression of minorities)
on minorities was that of extreme intolerance. In a 1998 magazine article, some RSS and BJP
members were been said to have distanced themselves from Golwalkar’s views, though not entirely.
The non-Hindu people of Hindustan must either adopt Hindu culture and languages, must learn
and respect and hold in reverence the Hindu religion, must entertain no idea but of those
of glorification of the Hindu race and culture…in a word they must cease to be foreigners; Or
may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation, claiming nothing, deserving
no privileges, far less any preferential treatment—not even citizens’ rights.==Affiliated organisations==Organisations that are inspired by the Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh’s ideology refer to themselves as members of the Sangh Parivar. In most cases,
pracharaks (full-time volunteers of the RSS) were deputed to start up and manage these
organisations in their initial years. The affiliated organisations include:
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), literally, Indian People’s Party (23m)
Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, literally, Indian Farmers’ Association (8m)
Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, literally, Indian Labour Association (10 million as of 2009)
Seva Bharti, Organisation for service of the needy.
Rashtra Sevika Samiti, literally, National Volunteer Association for Women (1.8m)
Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, literally, All India Students’ Forum (2.8m)
Shiksha Bharati (2.1m) Vishwa Hindu Parishad, World Hindu Council
(2.8m) Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh, literally, Hindu
Volunteer Association – overseas wing Swadeshi Jagaran Manch, Nativist Awakening
Front Saraswati Shishu Mandir, Nursery
Vidya Bharati, Educational Institutes Vanavasi Kalyan Ashram, Organisations for
the improvement of tribals, and Friends of Tribals Society
Muslim Rashtriya Manch, Organisation for the improvement of Muslims
Bajrang Dal, Army of Hanuman (2m) Anusuchit Jati-Jamati Arakshan Bachao Parishad,
Organisation for the improvement of Dalits Laghu Udyog Bharati, an extensive network
of small industries. Bharatiya Vichara Kendra, Think Tank.
Vishwa Samvad Kendra, Communication Wing, spread all over India for media related work,
having a team of IT professionals (samvada.org) Rashtriya Sikh Sangat, a sociocultural organisation
with the aim to spread the knowledge of Gurbani to the Indian society.
Vivekananda Kendra, promotion of Swami Vivekananda’s ideas with Vivekananda International Foundation
in New Delhi as a public policy think tank with six Centres of studyAlthough RSS has
never directly contested elections, it supports parties that are similar ideologically. Although
RSS generally endorses the BJP, it has at times refused to do so due to the difference
of opinion with the party.==Social service and reform=====
Participation in land reforms===The RSS volunteers participated in the Bhoodan
movement organised by Gandhian leader Vinobha Bhave, who had met RSS leader Golwalkar in
Meerut in November 1951. Golwalkar had been inspired by the movement that encouraged land
reform through voluntary means. He pledged the support of the RSS for this movement.
Consequently, many RSS volunteers, led by Nanaji Deshmukh, participated in the movement.
But Golwalkar was also critical of the Bhoodan movement on other occasions for being reactionary
and for working “merely with a view to counteracting Communism”. He believed that the movement
should inculcate a faith in the masses that would make them rise above the base appeal
of Communism.===Reform in ‘caste’===
The RSS has advocated the training of Dalits and other backward classes as temple high
priests (a position traditionally reserved for Caste Brahmins and denied to lower castes).
They argue that the social divisiveness of the caste system is responsible for the lack
of adherence to Hindu values and traditions, and that reaching out to the lower castes
in this manner will be a remedy to the problem. The RSS has also condemned upper-caste Hindus
for preventing Dalits from worshipping at temples, saying that “even God will desert
the temple in which Dalits cannot enter”.Jaffrelot says that “there is insufficient data available
to carry out a statistical analysis of social origins of the early RSS leaders” but goes
on to conclude that, based on some known profiles, most of the RSS founders and its leading organisers,
with a few exceptions, were Maharashtrian Brahmins from the middle or lower class and
argues that the pervasiveness of the Brahminical ethic in the organisation was probably the
main reason why it failed to attract support from the low castes. He argues that the “RSS
resorted to instrumentalist techniques of ethno-religious mobilisation—in which its
Brahminism was diluted—to overcome this handicap”. However, Anderson and Damle (1987)
find that members of all castes have been welcomed into the organisation and are treated
as equals.During a visit in 1934 to an RSS camp at Wardha accompanied by Mahadev Desai
and Mirabehn, Mahatma Gandhi said, “When I visited the RSS Camp, I was very much surprised
by your discipline and absence of untouchablity.” He personally inquired about this to Swayamsevaks
and found that volunteers were living and eating together in the camp without bothering
to know each other’s castes.==Relief and rehabilitation==
The RSS was instrumental in relief efforts after the 1971 Orissa Cyclone, 1977 Andhra
Pradesh Cyclone and in the 1984 Bhopal disaster. It assisted in relief efforts during the 2001
Gujarat earthquake, and helped rebuild villages. Approximately 35,000 RSS members in uniform
were engaged in the relief efforts, and many of their critics acknowledged their role.
An RSS-affiliated NGO, Seva Bharati, conducted relief operations in the aftermath of the
2004 Indian Ocean earthquake. Activities included building shelters for the victims and providing
food, clothes, and medical necessities. The RSS assisted relief efforts during the 2004
Sumatra-Andaman earthquake and the subsequent tsunami. Seva Bharati also adopted 57 children
(38 Muslims and 19 Hindus) from militancy affected areas of Jammu and Kashmir to provide
them education at least up to Higher Secondary level. They also took care of victims of the
Kargil War of 1999.In 2006 RSS participated in relief efforts to provide basic necessities
such as food, milk, and potable water to the people of Surat, Gujarat, who were affected
by floods in the region. The RSS volunteers carried out relief and rehabilitation work
after the floods affected North Karnataka and some districts of the state of Andhra
Pradesh. In 2013, following the Uttarakhand floods, RSS volunteers were involved in flood
relief work through its offices set up at affected areas.==Reception==
India’s first prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru had been vigilant towards RSS since he had
taken charge. When Golwalkar wrote to Nehru asking for the lifting of the ban on RSS after
Gandhi’s assassination, Nehru replied that the government had proof that RSS activities
were ‘anti-national’ by virtue of being ‘communalist’. In his letter to the heads of provincial governments
in December 1947, Nehru wrote that “we have a great deal of evidence to show that RSS
is an organisation which is in the nature of a private army and which is definitely
proceeding on the strictest Nazi lines, even following the techniques of the organisation.Sardar
Vallabhai Patel, the first Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister of India, said in early
January of 1948 that the RSS activists were “patriots who love their country”. He asked
the Congressmen to ‘win over’ the RSS by love, instead of trying to ‘crush’ them. He also
appealed to the RSS to join the Congress instead of opposing it. Jaffrelot says that this attitude
of Patel can be partly explained by the assistance the RSS gave the Indian administration in
maintaining public order in September 1947, and that his expression of ‘qualified sympathy’
towards RSS reflected the long-standing inclination of several Hindu traditionalists in Congress.
However, after Gandhi’s assassination on 30 January 1948, Patel began to view that the
activities of RSS were a danger to public security. In his reply letter to Golwalkar
on 11 September 1948 regarding the lifting of ban on RSS, Patel stated that though RSS
did service to the Hindu society by helping and protecting the Hindus when in need during
partition violence, they also began attacking Muslims with revenge and went against “innocent
men, women and children”. He said that the speeches of RSS were “full of communal poison”,
and as a result of that ‘poison’, he remarked, India had to lose Gandhi, noting that the
RSS men had celebrated Gandhi’s death. Patel was also apprehensive of the secrecy in the
working manner of RSS, and complained that all of its provincial heads were Maratha Brahmins.
He criticised the RSS for having its own army inside India, which he said, cannot be permitted
as “it was a potential danger to the State”. He also remarked: “The members of RSS claimed
to be the defenders of Hinduism. But they must understand that Hinduism would not be
saved by rowdyism.”Rajendra Prasad, the first President of India, did not approve of RSS.
In 1948, he criticised RSS for carrying out ‘loot, arson, rioting and killing of Muslims’
in Delhi and other Hindu majority areas. In his letter to home minister Patel on 14 May
1948, he stated that RSS men had planned to dress up as Muslims in Hindu majority areas
and attack Muslims in Muslim majority areas to create trouble. He asked Patel to take
strict action against RSS for aiming to create enmity among Hindus and Muslims. He called
RSS, a Maharashtrian Brahmin movement and viewed it as a secret organisation which used
violence and promoted fascism, without any regard to truthful means and constitutional
methods. He stated that RSS was “definitely a menace to public peace”.Field Marshal Cariappa
in his speech to RSS volunteers said “RSS is my heart’s work. My dear young men,
don’t be disturbed by uncharitable comments of interested persons. Look ahead! Go ahead!
The country is standing in need of your services.”Zakir Hussain, former President of India, told Milad
Mehfil in Monghyar on 20 November 1949, “The allegations against RSS of violence and hatred
against Muslims are wholly false. Muslims should learn the lesson of mutual love, cooperation
and organisation from RSS.” Gandhian leader and the leader of Sarvodaya
movement, Jayaprakash Narayan, who earlier had been a vocal opponent of RSS, had the
following to say about it in 1977: RSS is a revolutionary organisation. No other organisation
in the country comes anywhere near it. It alone has the capacity to transform society,
end casteism and wipe the tears from the eyes of the poor.
He further added, “I have great expectations from this revolutionary organisation which
has taken up the challenge of creating a new India.”==Criticisms and accusations==
Jaffrelot observes that although the RSS with its paramilitary style of functioning and
its emphasis on discipline has sometimes been seen by some as “an Indian version of fascism”,
he argues that “RSS’s ideology treats society as an organism with a secular spirit, which
is implanted not so much in the race as in a socio-cultural system and which will be
regenerated over the course of time by patient work at the grassroots. He writes that ideology
of the RSS did not develop a theory of the state and the race, a crucial element in European
nationalisms: Nazism and Fascism” and that the RSS leaders were interested in culture
as opposed to racial sameness.The likening of the Sangh Parivar to fascism by Western
critics has also been countered by Jyotirmaya Sharma, who labelled it as an attempt by them
to “make sense of the growth of extremist politics and intolerance within their society,”
and that such “simplistic transference” has done great injustice to our knowledge of Hindu
nationalist politics.RSS has been criticised as an extremist organisation and as a paramilitary
group. It has also been criticised when its members have participated in anti-Muslim violence;
it has since formed in 1984, a militant wing called the Bajrang Dal. Along with other extremist
organisations, the RSS has been involved in riots, often inciting and organising violence
against Christians and Muslims.===Involvement with riots===
The RSS has been censured for its involvement in communal riots. After giving careful and serious consideration
to all the materials that are on record,the Commission is of the view that the RSS with
its extensive organisation in Jamshedpur and which had close links with the Bharatiya Janata
Party and the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh had a positive hand in creating a climate which
was most propitious for the outbreak of communal disturbances.
In the first instance, the speech of Shri Deoras (delivered just five days before the
Ram Navami festival) tended to encourage the Hindu extremists to be unyielding in their
demands regarding Road No. 14. Secondly, his speech amounted to communal propaganda. Thirdly,
the shakhas and the camps that were held during the divisional conference presented a militant
atmosphere to the Hindu public. In the circumstances, the commission cannot but hold the RSS responsible
for creating a climate for the disturbances that took place on the 11th of April, 1979 Human Rights Watch, a non-governmental organisation
for human rights based in New York, has claimed that the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (World Hindu
Council, VHP), the Bajrang Dal, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, and the BJP have been party
to the Gujarat violence that erupted after the Godhra train burning. Local VHP, BJP,
and BD leaders have been named in many police reports filed by eyewitnesses. RSS and VHP
claimed that they made appeals to put an end to the violence and that they asked their
supporters and volunteer staff to prevent any activity that might disrupt peace.===Religious violence in Odisha===
Christian groups accuse the RSS alongside its close affiliates, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad
(VHP), the Bajrang Dal (BD), and the Hindu Jagaran Sammukhya (HJS), of participation
in the 2008 religious violence in Odisha.===Involvement in the Babri Masjid demolition
===According to the 2009 report of the Liberhan
Commission, the Sangh Parivar organised the destruction of the Babri Mosque. The Commission
said: “The blame or the credit for the entire temple construction movement at Ayodhya must
necessarily be attributed to Sangh Parivar.” It also noted that the Sangh Parivar is an
“extensive and widespread organic body” that encompasses organisations that address and
bring together just about every type of social, professional, and other demographic groupings
of individuals. The RSS has denied responsibility and questioned the objectivity of the report.
Former RSS chief K. S. Sudarshan alleged that the mosque had been demolished by government
men as opposed to the Karsevaks. On the other hand, a government of India white paper dismissed
the idea that the demolition was pre-organised. The RSS was banned after the 1992 Babri Masjid
demolition, when the government of the time considered it a threat to the state. The ban
was subsequently lifted in 1993 when no evidence of any unlawful activity was found by the
tribunal constituted under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.==Notable Swayamsevaks=====Political Leaders===
Deendayal Upadhyaya Atal Bihari Vajpayee
L. K. Advani Murli Manohar Joshi
Narendra Modi Rajnath Singh
Ram Nath Kovind Venkaiah Naidu
Nitin Gadkari Manohar Parrikar
Vijay Rupani Devendra Fadnavis
Ram Madhav Shankersinh Vaghela
Keshubhai Patel Pramod Mahajan
Gopinath Munde Biplab Kumar Deb===Pracharak===
Eknath Ranade Dattopant Thengadi – Trade Union leader
Ashok Singhal – VHP president==
See Also==Sangh ParivarRashtra Sevika SamitiHindu Swayamsevak
Sangh

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *