Muslim Rule: Decolonizing Romila Thapar 4/5

Muslim Rule: Decolonizing Romila Thapar 4/5

Namaste! One of the most important conflicts between different historical camps in India today concerns Muslim rule the camp on the left wants to deny that Muslims came as conquerors that Muslims colonized that Muslims imposed harsh, you know, religion and all kinds of things against Hindus that they cause destruction and so on while the Hindu camp wants to bring these things out put them on the table as part of history and then figure out ways of amicably settling things between the two communities. Here’s Professor Thapar’s overall posture on Islamic rule. -It is commonly said by people that should know better, but obviously don’t that for the last Thousand Years Hindus have been enslaved and victimized by Muslims and now finally they are free. That is not what history tells us. In the last thousand years, if you look at the status of Hindus in the sub-continent, very interesting ideas, events, people emerge. Sanskrit learning was located at many more centres in the subcontinent than it had been before. Because Sanskrit learning spread and it had a very impressive patronage of Maharajas, sultans and wealthy landowners many of whom had the money to actually finance pathshalas, muths and places of learning. -She’s quoting isolated instances where Muslims supported Sanskrit. She’s also quoting instances where Sanskrit flourished which are nothing to do with Muslims because Muslim rule was at the top level and the Grassroots continued functioning like before in many parts of the country. So, picking here and there cherry-picking where some Sanskrit was flourishing does not prove that Muslim rule was Pro Sanskrit or pro sanskriti. -The Striking compositions in this period for example, the great Siana, who writes a fascinating commentary on the Rig Ved which is a very very interesting insight into the medieval mind and how the medieval mind of the 14th century is looking back 3,000 years on the Rig Veda and giving a commentary verse by verse of the text. -Professor Thapar is right that certain eminent Sanskrit Scholars did their work during the Muslim era, but she is silent on why they stopped doing purvapaksha, which is a critique of the other they would have; they should have been doing purvapaksha of Muslims during this entire period but they did not. That absence of purvapaksha is something important that Thapar and others should talk about. -Many texts on mathematics in astronomy are being written and Indian astronomers and mathematicians many of whom were Hindu are praised, discussed and quoted in text from Baghdad. Did these mathematicians and astronomers on both sides know Sanskrit and Arabic otherwise, how could they have these discussions? how could they be quoting each other? They must have known it. What happened to that tradition? -Professors Thapar considers the Arab acknowledgement of Indian mathematics and their study of Sanskrit as some sort of a big favour they were doing to us. The fact is, that they were digesting this knowledge into Arabic and then later retransmitting it to Europe as though it’s their own. So, what we need to do is connect all the dots end to end and not just take isolated places where Arabs came and they were studying Indian Science astronomy, etc. etc. We should also look at what happened later. What happened centuries later after they had mined India and Indian civilization for such profound knowledge, what happened? They stop referencing India. They stopped the Sanskrit, you know, studies. They then started engaging Latin and Europeans and transmitting all this Indian knowledge as though it’s made in the Middle East. The fact that Hindu Society did not capitulate and come to an end under centuries of Muslim rule is a tribute to the resilience and how the Hindu Society was an open architecture and at the Grassroots it was not elitist because you could kill a few Elitist people and finish it off. But actually, Hindu society and intellectual life was pervasive. Now what she doesn’t want to talk about is all the destruction. Temples were destroyed, universities were destroyed, Hindus were turned into infidels, taxes were imposed. All kinds of things that happened during this era, she’s not talking about. Just the fact that they were tolerant and allowed a certain amount of Sanskrit studies and cultural studies to continue does not say that they were actually in support of this. One of the richest temples, which was destroyed was the Somnath temple in Gujarat. It was destroyed by Muslim Invaders one Invasion after another and in these invasions, they bragged about how many thousands of camels were required to bring all the gold back to the Middle East or wherever they took it. So, this is an important milestone in the and a scar in Hindu memory about the Islamic plunder and Professor Thapar wants to kind of, you know, give the Muslims a pass, make it look like it didn’t happen. It didn’t happen to that extent. It was okay and maybe if it happen, so what. Maybe it was a Hindu’s fault. So, in so in the rest of this episode, I’m going to talk about professor Thapar’s treatment of the plunder of Somnath Temple. -The Somnath book. I must say that i was myself very intrigued as I went from one set of sources to another because we have grown up on the theory which comes from the Turco Persian Chronicles. That he came, he desecrated the temple, he broke the idol and that was the beginning of the Hindu trauma. That is the way these Chronicles were interpreted. When I looked at the Chronicles and I since I don’t know Persian, I asked the help of a colleague of mine who has excellent Persian and we went through them. The interesting thing was that they contradicted each other. -The Chronicles. -The Chronicles. They’re really not quite sure what he broke. Did he break a lingam? Did he break an image? Because one at one stage they talk about him piercing the belly of the image as a whole bunch of precious stones fell out of the belly. In the case of the lingam, one man says it’s on the ground, the other man says it’s suspended because they had a magnet in the ceiling. -Professors Thapar’s entire argument rests on saying that two different Muslim Chronicles about this raid and plunder don’t match in minute details. But you know, even if there were multiple eyewitnesses today about a crime that happened today, you will not find an exact match of what all the eyewitnesses say. That doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. So, the tone of The Chronicles the Muslim Chronicles is very similar. They are very proud. These are infidels. These Idols have to be smashed. They have lots of gold and wealth that has to be taken from the infidels. So, the motives and the basic nature of the deed is not in dispute. It’s minor details that that professors Thapar turns into some big deal. Professor Thapar thinks that citing some Sanskrit texts will support her case that the plunder never happened or if it happened, it was not that big a deal. Please watch. -So, I started looking at the Sanskrit inscriptions and they’re fascinating inscriptions because a lot of them deal with the Temple of Somnath, it’s estates. And we’re now into the 12th, 13th century, the Traders is a Persian Trader called Nuruddin who comes and has a legal contract drawn up with the local Traders about getting land to build a mosque. And some of the land is from the Somnath estate. -And it’s giving to him. -And it’s given to him to build a mosque because the mosque is referred to as a dharma sthan. -There are several flaws in her argument. First of all, this grant of Temple land to build a mosque happens 200 years after the plunder. So, we’re not talking about the same thing. The temple has been plundered but the land wasn’t taken as part of the plunder. So, the lands are now being taken and the fact that the, the temple priests and the temple officials give this land for to somebody for building a mosque, doesn’t mean that there was great harmony between the religions. Because after all the Muslims were ruling so under what circumstances and what duress and for what reasons did the Hindus give this, she doesn’t tell us. But the fact that Hindus gave shows their generosity. It doesn’t mean that the Muslims are very good to them. Professor Thapar wants to claim that there was no such thing as Hindu trauma during missile Muslims and she citing some examples from here and there trying to muster up as much evidence to support that Muslims are very good to the Hindus. But this is selective use of evidence. There is a huge amount of information available on the different rulers and what they did against the Hindus and this requires serious scholarship. It requires honesty. I don’t think we should blame today’s Muslims for what previous Muslims did because even today’s Muslims, you know, it’s not their fault. They may be the products of earlier forced conversions or something along those lines. So, I think as far as peace and harmony with today’s Muslims is concerned. I don’t think that’s going to be compromised if history is corrected and, and the historical record is, you know, shown to include all the atrocities. After all, in Germany, they teach about you know, nazi holocaust. Jews talk about the Jewish Holocaust. In the United States blacks required teaching of slavery, you know. So, people around the world have suffered in the past and it’s okay to teach it. It doesn’t mean that today’s people have to be held responsible for what their ancestors may have done. So, I think that it’s a bad idea for Professor Thapar in the name of political correctness to try to cover up what the Muslims did. I would like that Meenakshi Jane who I think is a very good scholar on the whole Islamic period and Professor Thapar should have a debate should have a face-to-face debate. I would love to see facilitate that I would love to have my own conversation with Professor Thapar on all these issues that I have raised. I hope there is no feeling that I’ve been rude to her. I respect her as an individual as a scholar. She’s a great historian, but she’s wrong on so many things and in the spirit of free-thinking critical inquiry, open debate which she champions, I would like to invite her for further conversation.

100 thoughts on “Muslim Rule: Decolonizing Romila Thapar 4/5

  1. This is part 4 of my "Decolonizing Romila Thapar" series. You can watch part 3 here:
    To donate to Infinity Foundation’s projects including the continuation of such episodes and the research we do:

  2. Slavery is just not a word; it makes your BODY, EMOTIONS and MIND slaves and allows MASTER’s soul enter into yours SOUL thus making someone SLAVE is a complete technology in which Hindustan was engulfed for more than 1200 years at a stretch by more than 10 nations…your BODY is now FREE since 1947, now you have to FREE your emotions, mind and at the end you have to pulled masters’ souls out from your soul by then Hindustan will be FREE from all kind of slaveries…it’s long journey yet to walk on.

  3. These idiots in JNU can't think on their own. These are the educated youth of JNU.
    Education does not mean awareness
    Knowledge does not mean intelligence.
    These idiots can only chant anti India slogans.
    Never employ these lunatics

  4. Thank you for your education! I have made it my life goal to spread this knowledge to all my friends in the US and Italy where I live! After 35 years abroad most of my friends know more about Indian history than their own!

  5. She is dumb lady everything was looted our treasures our literature and people killed the most scared book the Quran it self is destruction of man kind how can she compare our scripts and literature with Arabic a ignorant lady doing publicity for money

  6. bakhtiyaar khilji came and destroyed nalanda university killing thousands of Hindus and Buddhists, but still he was peaceful.

  7. I recommend all of you to read "pakistan of partition of india" chapter 12 page 325 by Dr B R Ambedkar. where he brutally exposed the true nature of Islam. read the full book if possible. because no one can call him islamophobiac or Hindu apologist.

  8. The spectators seem to be a bunch of impotents. So is the narrator as he is awfullro leftist.. romila thaper is to history is what digvijasingh to politics. A wiseacre historian, an mercenary of anti indian NGOs

  9. Arabs and Iranians did not did not come to India and ruled the subcontinent. It was the turco-mongols from Central Asia and Afghanistan. Arabs went westwards to North Africa and Europe and established Universities at Baghdad, Damascus, Cairo, Fez with knowledge from India, China, Iran and Greece. European Renessianc was a result of contact with Arabic civilisation. I don’t understand what Mr Malhotra is trying to prove.

  10. Don't give the benefit of doubt to thapar that she taught wrong history because of compulsions of political correctness. The mannequin_ students are eating out of her hands!! Fascinating to watch their see!! Now I understand the JNU mindset. It's the presentation of the language a la the thapars and tharoors that impresses these kids.

  11. Today if her property is snatched away by fake forgerised documents and claimed by the new owner of her property that she has donated it, will she agree, oblige and honor?

  12. Political correctness is a eyewash, it's all about either money, or power&position or mix of both….
    Ultimately promoting the mughal, British (non hindu rulers) propoganda to glorify Islamic invaders & give them clean chit…. In short make them great & in return get close to left Liberals whose main agenda is to malign Sanatan dharm & Bharatiya sanskriti

  13. Can Romilla explain why so few Sanskrit books were written in 1000 yrs of Slavery – Muslim & British and out entire ethos is of 1000 yrs before and have the largest collection of books of that era
    which define what we are
    Nalanda books were coverted in Russian, German, Chinese before it was burned and you can see the progress made in science by thse countires and why no Nalanda was raised for next 1000 yrs?

  14. Aftermath of 3rd battle of Panipat (Source: Wikipedia)

    The Afghan cavalry and pikemen ran wild through the streets of Panipat, killing tens of thousands of Maratha soldiers and civilians. The women and children seeking refuge in streets of Panipat were hounded back in Afghan camps as slaves. Children over 14 were beheaded before their own mothers and sisters. Afghan officers who had lost their kin in battle were permitted to carry out massacres of 'infidel' Hindus the next day also, in Panipat and the surrounding area. They arranged victory mounds of severed heads outside their camps. According to the single best eyewitness chronicle – the bakhar by Shuja-ud-Daula's Diwan Kashi Raj – about 40,000 Maratha prisoners were slaughtered in cold blood the day after the battle. According to Hamilton, a reporter of the Bombay Gazette about half a million Marathi people were present there in Panipat town and he gives a figure of 40,000 prisoners as executed by Afghans.[citation needed] Many of the fleeing Maratha women jumped into the Panipat wells rather than risk rape and dishonour. All of the prisoners were transported on bullock carts, camels and elephants in bamboo cages.

  15. Muhammad , peace and blessings of Allah be upon him~the Final Messenger of God.
    Michael H. Hart of USA who wrote "The 100 most influential persons in history" and placed Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be upon him) as number one, on the top of the list

    "My choice of Muhammad to lead the best of the world's most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular levels.
    His complete biography has been authenticated and circulated amongst scholars around the world starting while he was still alive and continuing up until today. One of the first examples we quote from is from the Encyclopedia Britannica, as it confirms:

    (Regarding Muhammad) "… a mass of detail in the early sources shows that he was an honest and upright man who had gained the respect and loyalty of others who were likewise honest and upright men." [Vol. 12]
    Reverend R. Bosworth-Smith wrote in "Mohammed & Mohammedanism" in 1946:

    "Head of the state as well as the Church, he was Caesar and Pope in one; but, he was pope without the pope's claims, and Caesar without the legions of Caesar, without a standing army, without a bodyguard, without a palace, without a fixed revenue. If ever any man had the right to say that he ruled by a Right Divine, it was Mohammad, for he had all the power without instruments and without its support. He cared not for dressing of power. The simplicity of his private life was in keeping with his public life."
    George Bernard Shaw:

    "I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving the problems in a way that would bring the much needed peace and happiness. Europe is beginning to be enamored of the creed of Muhammad. In the next century it may go further in recognizing the utility of that creed in solving its problems." (A Collection of writing of some of the eminent scholars, 1935).
    Lamartine's tribute to the Prophet:

    "If greatness of purpose, smallness of means and astounding results are the three criteria of human genius, who could claim to compare any great man in modern history with Muhammad?" (Histoire de la Turquie, 1855).

    "I wanted to know the best of one who holds today undisputed sway over the hearts of millions of mankind… I became more than convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the Prophet, the scrupulous regard for his pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and in his own mission. These and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every obstacle. When I closed the 2nd volume (of the Prophet's biography), I was sorry there was not more for me to read of the great life."
    English author Thomas Carlyle in his 'Heroes and Hero Worship', was simply amazed:

    "How one man single handedly, could weld warring tribes and wandering Bedouins into a most powerful and civilized nation in less than two decades."
    EWolfgang Goethe, perhaps the greatest European poet ever, wrote about Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. He said:

    "He is a prophet and not a poet and therefore his Quran is to be seen as Divine Law and not as a book of a human being, made for education or entertainment." [Noten und Abhandlungen zum Weststlichen Dvan, WA I, 7, 32]

    Muhammad, peace be upon him, was nothing more or less than a human being, but he was a man with a noble mission, which was to unite humanity on the worship of ONE and ONLY ONE GOD and to teach them the way to honest and upright living based on the commands of God. He always described himself as, 'A Servant and Messenger of God' and so indeed every action of his proclaimed to be.
    ' In a time of Universal Deceit , telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act . ''''

  16. The commentator is nt honest. Let me ask one simple question ~ when the muslims left India, after 800 years, how is it possible that the majority of the population remained Hindus ? ~85 percent or so.
    The commentator please ~ did u think abt it n u called that ~ ''''' ruled over u ''' , i dnt knw the answer but let people who have common sense think.

  17. Actually the Arabs did not “First study Sanskrit and then pass it off as their own and then later study Latin”. Respect to the professor but this is factually incorrect. There was no intense interest in Sanskrit to begin with. They came as conquerers and colonizers and that’s about it. The Ummayads and Abbasids began a study and translation of Greek works and at no point did they pass that off as their own either. Malhotra is being intellectually dishonest here because of his own issues with Islam. He cannot objectively study Islamic history which makes him, in this regard at least, intellectually lazy. She’s wrong by giving the invaders a pass and whitewashing history and he’s wrong by doing the opposite and blackwashing all off their history including that outside of India. Both are intellectually weak. The end result is Malhotra maintaining the alterity of Islam and Muslims despite words to the contrary. He’s right about the Arab plunder of India which was shameful but his general disposition towards Islam is quite shallow given that India was a very small part of overall Islamic history and civilization.

  18. It seems thapar gets orgasm while glorifying katus….j&k in itself is manifestation of what katuas is all about…bloody sick women


  20. She should be put behind the bars for distorting the Indian history as per her will. Indian Hindus will not spare for her wrongdoing deliberately for her vested interests.

  21. I am ashamed as being a woman when I see women like Romilla Thapar .women nowadays are athiests and communists .earlier women were torch bearers of our religion and culture.sad

  22. She is illiterate on mediaeval history, she is ancient historian why she talks on mediaeval history?
    All Hindus should support Hindutwa to avenge for Nalanda, Taxila and Somnath Temple against Radical islam as proud infidels. 🚩🚩🚩🙅💪🔪🔫

  23. मैक्समूलर के चेले चेलियों और वामपंथी इतिहास कारो ने भारत झूठा इतिहास परोसा….. तथ्यों को तोड़ा मरोड़ा और अपने विचारों को इतिहास के कलेवर में लपेट शिक्षा पद्धति में फैला दिया…..

  24. Oh, so Muslims who provide lucrative employment in the Gulf countries to Indian Hindus are good and therefore Islam is good too. It is the Muslims of Pakistan who are bad and so is Islam.  Wow! No go figure!

  25. In ppak they glorify gazni Gori,Qasim Babur Aurngzeb is their hero ,even Jinnah was a hindu from Gujarat who never read naamaaaz,was fond of pig meat and smoke and drank ,

  26. I wonder if islam has done any good to the world. During muslim conquest, all the great ancient Sanskrit learning was first translated into Persian and then into Latin. And since then, maybe even today, Westerners think that mathematics as well as 'algebra' derive from Arabic. This is utterly pure nonsense. The same goes when muslims conquered Spain for 500 to 800 years. They plundered and destroyed Christian churches and with those very stones built mosques instead. Arab rulers in the Middle East had Christian translators who rendered works from Latin into Arabic and other languages…Arabs were conquerors and wondered if they spoke any other language beside Arabic. Thank you Rajiv for your insight.

  27. Mrs. Thapar, and the other innocent looking dude must read the history of Islamic conquers what they have done to mankind over 1100 years.

    These figures are a rough estimate of the death of non-Muslims by the political act of jihad.
Thomas Sowell [Thomas Sowell, Race and Culture, BasicBooks, 1994, p. 188] estimates that 11 million slaves were shipped across the Atlantic and 14 million were sent to the Islamic nations of North Africa and the Middle East. For every slave captured many others died. Estimates of this collateral damage vary. The renowned missionary David Livingstone estimated that for every slave who reached a plantation, five others were killed in the initial raid or died of illness and privation on the forced march.[Woman’s Presbyterian Board of Missions, David Livingstone, p. 62, 1888] Those who were left behind were the very young, the weak, the sick and the old. These soon died since the main providers had been killed or enslaved. So, for 25 million slaves delivered to the market, we have an estimated death of about 120 million people. Islam ran the wholesale slave trade in Africa.
120 million Africans
The number of Christians martyred by Islam is 9 million [David B. Barrett, Todd M. Johnson, World Christian Trends AD 30-AD 2200, William Carey Library, 2001, p. 230, table 4-10] . A rough estimate by Raphael Moore in History of Asia Minor is that another 50 million died in wars by jihad. So counting the million African Christians killed in the 20th century we have:
60 million Christians
Koenard Elst in Negationism in India gives an estimate of 80 million Hindus killed in the total jihad against India. [Koenard Elst, Negationism in India, Voice of India, New Delhi, 2002, pg. 34.] The country of India today is only half the size of ancient India, due to jihad. The mountains near India are called the Hindu Kush, meaning the “funeral pyre of the Hindus.”
80 million Hindus
Buddhists do not keep up with the history of war. Keep in mind that in jihad only Christians and Jews were allowed to survive as dhimmis (servants to Islam) everyone else had to convert or die. Jihad killed the Buddhists in Turkey, Afghanistan, along the Silk Route, and in India. The total is roughly 10 million. [David B. Barrett, Todd M. Johnson, World Christian Trends AD 30-AD 2200, William Carey Library, 2001, p. 230, table 4-1.] 10 million Buddhists
Oddly enough there were not enough Jews killed in jihad to significantly affect the totals of the Great Annihilation. The jihad in Arabia was 100 percent effective, but the numbers were in the thousands, not millions. After that, the Jews submitted and became the dhimmis (servants and second class citizens) of Islam and did not have geographic political power.
    This gives a rough estimate of 270 million killed by jihad.

  28. Satyameva Jayate – The banner that reminds ALL Citizens of The Nation – The malice in the mouths of many are in the Thoughts, Deeds, Acts that have been left for ALL to see and witness as evidence. The Path that is of The Truths will always reveal the falsehoods that get spoken by the emerging generations. Each with a myopic view on the Past that is fading fast. The Nation that has accumulated the heritage over many tens of hundreds of years will always remember The Costs and sufferings of ALL The Ancestors that have become dust in the blown away winds of change. To remain relevant to The Path where Good Thoughts, Good Deeds, Good acts the surviving generation need to revive the flame of TRUTH. In this Kal yug to remain silent and to be isolated is becoming easy. Those who shout out the loudest and the frequently they repeat their falsified views appear to gain the upper hand. The opportunities to be heard for The Truth are becoming fewer and fewer. Generations will become buried in the many layers of lies and criminal verbiage and The Future will only see the words that had been recorded by the criminal elements in the immediate past. The Granth where The 10 Nanaks have become entrapped in the pages give vivid depiction of The Life under The marauding bandits and gangsters that roamed The various regions of The Nation. Turks have been mentioned in numerous places in The Granth. Much of the atrocities and hardships that The Citizens of The Nation suffered indeed are The Ancestors of The Land that was devastating by these hideous monstrous invaders. They were not friends and they came to destroy and to plunder. The evidence is very well recorded in The Nanak’s Granth. These scripts are retelling of the Life that ordinary Humans lead when under the rule of their criminal Uber man. When allowed to examine and investigate the events that were beyond the Historic periods of The Grants, what gets revealed? More of the same and by the same bad rules from the same origins where all others came from! Is it any more to speak of? NO, The color of tar is black and it gets called – BLACK – Therefore, seething words can be said by anyone in Kal YUG, yet the meaning of the word that describes ‘black will still be called black! Unless, the words get changed from ‘black’ to some other color of rainbow! It is Kal yug now and anyone can create any narrative to fit a purpose and get a PhD in Deep Thought. Now a days there are scholars who have been awarded Doctorates in ‘sneezing’ and its many Different recordings. Absurd views and worthless opinions challenge solid evidence. Yes, it is Kal Yug and that is what can be expected,these days. However, Satyameva Jayate will continue to reveal The Path that needs to be followed.

  29. This woman (Theper) certainly sold herself to the ruling Cong by taking a few crs of rupees (it is assumed) for distorting the true history, which they wanted. She is purely an anti-national woman.

  30. The body language of thaper tell us that there was no muslim aggregation during and after entry of the Muslim invaders . But definitely there was serious human right violation as well plundering of lot wealth from India . Narrations by thaper may more encourage the present days Muslims who always show supremacy over other communities . As such the incorrect presentation of thaper should be stopped and she need to show the door of her native.

  31. Luckly She's a hindu if she's a Muslim and spread hatred like this we will see her in a way to hell rip thaper. Wt a fcking jock

  32. Ha ha intelligent moron. I challenge her. If she has a knowledge about our indian history. Then she can accept my challenge.

  33. She is the most foolish woman. She thinks she is erudite. But she knows nothing. She only wants to take sides and communalise the issue

  34. These leftist historians are not worthy of being branded as historians.They are liars and did it intentionally for distorting our history.

  35. To mila tha per is a list and suedo Secular having an agenda of communist to defame India and Indians.Shame on her for partial and false history.

  36. I didn't understand what is the connection between Katmullahs Atankwadi & Romila Thapar. When Hindusthan & Pakistan divided. Why the Katmullahs Gaddar left from Hindusthan.

  37. Destroy all Muslim structures in India ( defined by Akhand Bharat ) including India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Tibet, POK, Brahmadesh ( Burma), Lanka and Maldives.

  38. Romila is fit to be slapped daily, every hour, for the rest of her life to have such scumbag views for atrocities and plunder the bastard Islamists did on Hindus.
    The very fact that she is alive today is, we still don't believe in "blasphemy". If we change our view and take up a sword even now, it's curtains for her kinds and the religion she is coquettish about.

  39. Its a shame that these people are called as historians. Infact they are killers of history. They just wrote propaganda put up by corrupt Congressi regime run by useless Nehru khandaan !!! Shameless people narrating false history .

    Muslims invaded and not only desecrated Hindu Temples rather they broke Churches , Temples , synagogues and other places of worship of other religions all over the world !!! Only MUSLIMS had free license & Islamic directions to broke other religious sites every where in the world, let alone India.

    Muslims Invader thugs broke Temples in India , Afghanistan, Pakistan , Fire Temples of Zorastarians in Iran. Jewish SYNAGOGUES in Modern day Israel ( Judea & Sumerea ), Churches of Catholics in Iraq, Syria, lebanon & Jordan. Churches of Coptic Christians in Alexanderia, Egypt, Orthodox Churches in Turkey , Cyprus , Greece , Bulgaria, Armenia, Albania, Georgia and Chechnya. Catholic Churches in Sicily, Hungary, Italy, Portugal & Spain.

    It was in SPAIN that the Zihadis got a very TIGHT SLAP on their face & were thrown out of Spain by Catholics after Reconquesta War. The Moorish muslim king & muslims in general were defeated & told to leave SPAIN or get Killed.
    The Muslim ummah or brotherhood still weeps remembering the rule of Al – Andalusia ( Spain ). All Mosquws were razed to rubbles & instead glorious cathedrals of christ were made. Same was done on Sri Ram Temple on which the Babri structure was rightfully broken by the Hindus.

  40. I find her book history of India very interesting I may be wrong but I find her comment interesting and I agre with most what she says

  41. ये मादरचोद रोमिला थापर हिन्दू औरत नहीं है । इस भ्रम में मत रहना ।
    मादरचोद रोमिला थापर तेरीमा की चूत ।
    मादरचोद नक्सली कुत्ती तेरी चूत मारने
    में मजा नहीं आयेगा क्योंकि तू बूढ़ी रण्डी
    हो चुकी है । तेरे को मार देने में बङा सुकून मिलेगा । कम से कम कोई और तो
    इस चुङेल औरत को नहीं देखें । ये मादरचोद नक्सली बुढ़ी जवानी में नक्सलियों से चुदवाती थी । ये बुढ़ी मरने को मर जायेगी मगर सुधरेगी नहीं क्योंकि
    इस रण्डी को नक्सलियों से पैसे मिलते हैं । ये मादरचोद रण्डी देश बेचकर पैसे इकठ्ठे करती है । ये मादरचोद रण्डी देश द्रोही है । ये मादरचोद नक्सली रण्डी है ।
    ये मादरचोद इंडिया के खिलाफ बोलती रहती है । ये मादरचोद रण्डी नक्सलियों
    की रखेल है ।

  42. Romilla Thaper, Irfan Habeeb & Nurul Hasan etc are Storians, no Historians. They have ruined the whole history by saving Muslim misdeeds.

  43. Rajivji it is fruitless to counter her she has mindset idea about what her belief and constantly attempt it to be factual one she deed not seem to be historian but voice of influence she had gathered out of her immtional attachment

  44. Our constitution does not permit to ban her or arrest her for propeganda or agenda she pretend against fact an filling of majority by we should avoid her by and ban our selves to heard her speech

  45. She is Urban Naxal.Aurangjeb ne hazro hinduo ki sirf isliye hatya ki kyuki wo hindu tha….Unse Jajia Kar wasoola GAya wo bi sahi tha kya ? Guru Govind singh,Banda Baragi,Teg Bahadur, Guru Govind singh ke Teen bete aur Lakho logo ko Islaam naa kabool karne pe maar diya wo sahi tha kya ? Kaisi ye dhongi aurat hai sali

  46. Nehruvian and Marxist historians also distorted Savarkarji's image so much that Indians by and large started hating him. They did the same thing about Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. Such is the power of false propaganda.

  47. Sir…. Sanskrit learning finished in Kashmir. No Sanskrit Schools left in the valley.What has happened to this lady.

  48. She should see the how the isis destroyed the indiigenous culture of Iraq & the s(h)ame continued in HINDUSTAN..disgustingly..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *