McSally on her push to make domestic terror a federal crime

McSally on her push to make domestic terror a federal crime


BETWEEN HOUSE DEMOCRATS AND NETANYAHU’S ADMINISTRATION.>>Charles: SHOULD TROY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NOT TO THE AFTERMATH OF THOSE MULTIPLE MASS SHOOTINGS HERE IN AMERICA. ARIZONA REPUBLICAN SENATOR DRAFTING A NEW DOMESTIC TERRORISM BILL WHEN SHE JOINS ME NOW. THE CENTER, WELCOME.>>HEY CHARLES, THANKS DRIVE ME ON.>>Charles: THINK FOR COMING ON. TELL US WHAT’S INSIDE THE SPELL.>>I THINK WE CAN ALL AGREE THAT WE SHOULD BE CONDEMNING WHITE NATIONALISM, WE COULD SHOULD BE CONDEMNING AND PREVENTING HALF-FULL JUSTICE FOR ANY RACIALLY JUST FIVE VIOLENCE AND I WAS ACTUALLY SURPRISED TO FIND OUT AS I WAS LOOKING FOR MEANINGFUL SOLUTIONS THAT DOMESTIC TERRORISM IS NOT ACTUALLY A CRIME IN OUR FEDERAL CODE. THIS BILL WOULD ACTUALLY MAKE IT A CRIME JUST LIKE INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM AND ALLOW US TO BRING FULL JUSTICE AND GIVE MORE TOOLS TO OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR PEOPLE WHO TAKES THESE ACTS OF VIOLENCE.>>Charles: WHAT WOULD QUALIFY AS A DOMESTIC TERRORIST ACT? IN OTHER WORDS WE HAVE SEEN LOTS OF TERRORIST ACTS AT MOTIVATED BY DIFFERENT REASONS INCLUDING RELIGION IN THIS COUNTRY, I THOUGHT THEY WERE ALL CONSIDERED TERRORISM. HOW WOULD YOU DISTINGUISH DIRECT DOMESTIC TERRORISM?>>WE USE THE DEFINITION THAT’S ALREADY IN FEDERAL LAW AND THEY HAVE TO COMMIT SOME OTHER ACT OF VIOLENCE, MURDER OR MANSLAUGHTER OR KIDNAPPING, BUT THE INTENT IS TO INTIMIDATE OR COERCE A CIVILIAN POPULATION. SIMILAR TO WHAT WE SEE WITH INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM. THIS APPROACH AGAIN MAKES IT SO THAT FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT DOESN’T HAVE TO TAKE THEM UP ON OTHER CRIMES, BUT WHEN THE IDENTIFIED WHETHER IT WAS A SYNAGOGUE ATTACK OR WHAT APPEARS TO BE WITHOUT PAUSE PASO ARE OTHERS THAT ARE CLEARLY MOTIVATED WITH HATE AND TO TERRORIZE THAT THEY COULD USE THIS AS A TOOL FOR JUSTICE. IT ALSO ALLOWS THEM TO REALLY FOCUS AND STUDY WITH HIS FRIENDS ARE.>>Charles: DO WE HAVE HATE CRIMES ON THE BOOK? HOW WOULD THIS BE DIFFERENT?>>AGAIN, HATE CRIMES ARE ON THE BOOKS BUT THIS IS SPECIFICALLY FOCUSED THE PARALLEL, WE HAVE INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM WHERE SOMEBODY IS SUPPORTING ISIS, BUT WE NEED DOMESTIC TERRORISM WHERE SOMEBODY IS USING SIMILAR TACTICS TO TERRORIZE A POPULATION BASED ON THEIR HATRED TOWARD THE PARTICULAR GROUP. IT LINES UP WITH THE WAY WEEK CODIFY INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM, BUT IT ALSO PROTECTS FREE SPEECH.>>Charles: REAL QUICK BECAUSE I WANT TO CHANGE GEARS A LITTLE BIT, IS THERE A DIFFERENT CURRENT PENALTY THEIR? WITH THE MAXIMUM PENALTY UNDER YOUR BELT?>>IT DEPENDS ON WHAT THE UNDERLYING CRIME IS, WHETHER IT’S A MURDER OR WHETHER IT’S KIDNAPPING IT SO IT LINES UP SIMILARLY, IT COULD BE ANYTHING FROM TEN YEARS UP TO THE DEATH PENALTY AND PARALLEL WITH OUR OTHER LAWS.>>Charles: I WANT TO SWITCH GEARS TO THE NEWS OUT OF ISRAEL THAT BENJAMIN NETANYAHU WILL NOT ALLOW REPRESENTATIVES OMAR AND TLAIB TO ENTER THE COUNTRY. OF COURSE THEY HAVE PACKED SOME CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES AGAINST ISRAEL, INCLUDING A BOYCOTT SITUATION. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS AND WHAT DO YOU THINK THIS DOES TO THE POLITICAL PROCESS IN THIS COUNTRY?>>I THINK ISRAEL HAS A RIGHT TO DECIDE WHO CAN COME INTO THE COUNTRY JUST LIKE WE DO. FOR MY PART I LOVE ISRAEL, I’VE BEEN DEPLOYED TO THE MIDDLE EAST FIVE TIMES AND I THINK THAT BOTH OMAR AND TLAIB, THEIR ACTIONS AND THEIR WORDS HAVE BEEN DANGEROUS. THEY ARE ANTI-SEMITISM AND SUPPORT TO THE BDS MOVEMENT, THEY PERSONALLY LEAD AN EFFORT TO ENSURE THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COULDN’T POSSIBLE TO CONDEMN ANTI-SEMITISM. THIS IS THE WRONG DIRECTION, WE NEED TO STAND CLOSELY WITH ISRAEL AND NOT ALLOW THEIR DANGEROUS IDEAS TO BE FUELING ANY OF THE RHETORIC THAT IS AGAINST THE JEWISH PEOPLE, AGAINST ISRAEL AND SUPPORTING THE ECONOMIC BDS MOVEMENT AND OTHERS. THIS IS OUT OF THE MAINSTREAM, IT’S DANGEROUS, AND I LOVE ISRAEL UNLIKE OMAR AND TLAIB.>>Charles: DO YOU THINK NANCY PELOSI WILL NOT BE PUSHED FURTHER BACK? I THINK SHE COULD CLEAN A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE, BUT THERE’S NOT BEEN ANY REAL PUSHBACK ON THEM. ON THE CONTRARY IT FEELS MORE RECENTLY THAT NANCY PELOSI HAS MADE THE DECISION TO BACK THEM NO MATTER HOW CONTROVERSIAL THEY ARE.>>I THINK IT’S EXTREMELY UNFORTUNATE. THERE ARE MANY DEMOCRATS IN THE HOUSE AND SOME OF THE DO SUPPORT IS REAL. I THINK THESE TWO AND SOME OTHERS HAVE HIJACKED THEIR DISCUSSIONS AND THESE ARE REALLY IMPORTANT ISSUES FOR US TO BE BIPARTISAN ON. I HOPE SPEAKER PELOSI STANDS UP AGAINST THEM, BECAUSE OF THEIR DANGEROUS RHETORIC, AND CONTINUES TO SHOW STRONG BIPARTISAN SUPPORT FOR OUR ALLY,

100 thoughts on “McSally on her push to make domestic terror a federal crime

  1. This could be abused by allowing the state to define terrorism based on changing ideologies of the administration in power. We currently have Congress woman Omar expressing concern over “white terrorism”, imagine if she could wield anti-terror law enforcement force based on that idea.. We shouldn’t give these wack jobs more power.

  2. This better include the antifa terrorists!! Maybe mayor Ted Wheeler of Portland Will finally be thrown into jail! You just can’t fix stupid, and this man is just as stupid as antifa!!

  3. a bill to take away freedom and just what exactly is wrong with being a white nationalist? Is it wrong to be a oriental nationalist in china?

  4. One more statute, that should fit well with the other 60 million mostly useless and unconstitutional statutes. But its for our safety like the patriot act. So lets all get behind the making some more of our " rights " into mere privileges.

  5. This is a worthless bill unless it names insightment to riotous behavior by public figures as a felony act, and as so pronounced by Supreme Court not an act of free speech..! Jail time Maxine Waters .!
    And if that isn't the intent of the bill it's worthless words on paper and not fit for one vote..!

  6. We don't need any new federal laws. This increases the invasiveness of the federal government in our lives. There should be only crimes. Something ad ambiguous as the term hate crime can be used on a whim to get someone who has not committed a crime nor intends to. This is a very slippery slope.

  7. Why doesn't Mc Sally Submit legislation That Corruption in public office and Defiance of constitutional oath a federal crime? It's simple . Lawmakers only write laws for everyone else the does not apply to them. The laws either apply to all are there Noll and void Without power or effect. Legislators and law makers Or accountable For And shall not create any law that they themselves cannot follow Or obey. And the majority of the people shall not follow any law that is unconstitutional or is contrary To what is reasonable , Ethical And morally stands on solid foundation of the Constitution. Most laws passed for the last 30 years have been for the few that benefit at the restrictions of the many. Law should not be written unless absolutely necessary. Legislative bodies That write an over abundance Of laws Not Completely justified Is a poor Stuart of that post. Texas passed a bill into law Stating You cannot have sexual Relations with a pokey pine?. Did that really have to be put into law? Was it such an epidemic That a law was required? You think that would be just common sense and those insane enough to actually attempt it Deserve what the porcupine Does to them. At that point the problem solves itself. No federal action was actually necessary just Having to ask that question Of so called Higher educated With lengthy credentials Public servants That tried to justify engaging and such nonsense Insults the intelligence Of any critical Thinking person With a moderate Degree of common sense And A minimum application of reason and accountability could ever come to such conclusions As to spend tens of millions Of taxpayer dollars On Such a Unnecessary no brainer. It is merely corruption at its finest that needs to be the 1st Attention of bar The 2nd should be the MSM, Google, Youtube, And Twitter platform provider status be removed And be held accountable as publishers Either they will straighten up And fly right or they will be sued out of existence. As it should be. Until these problems are addressed do the people a favor make Sally Shut your lion pie hole.

  8. Oh looky, FOX disabled it's comment sections again in continued efforts to control the narrative and agenda so the world can't see the vile and treasonous filth it's followers spew! So much for it's love for "freedom of speech", must be the big bad liberal media making them do it again, eh Comrades? Now the world can see that they are even censoring their own LMFAO!!!

  9. Not agaist the law? Reminds me of when a dude on craigslist in Germany advertised for someone to eat him. Then, the authorities found out there was no laws against cannibalism in Germany.

  10. The bastards will just live better in a fed prison vs a state prison. Penalty should be quick public hanging and save tax payers

  11. OMG, Tlaib needs for a nose job, she needs to go see a South Korean surgeon before she speak another word in public.

  12. Under this standard The Boston tea party would be categorized as a Domestic Terrorists. The FBI dont need any more tools to falsely categories people who are sick and tired of Government intrusions upon the Rights and Freedoms it is supposed to be protecting…

  13. This is not needed, we already have "hate crimes" and the like. Domestic terror laws would allow law enforcement to bring due force on the common citizens. Enforce the laws that are already on the books.

  14. Forget about Omar & Tlaib the real lie is; Trump approves the allocation of $38 billion to Israel in 2018. Israel has the largest lobbyist group in the US to continue the US spending millions on them. Question Power of Pro-Israeli Lobby, no more foreign money buying our politicians. Netanyahu agenda is always leading the US into Israel wars for its benefit. They did it in Iraq with Netan the Yahoos intelligence speech on their weapons of mass destruction. They're doing it again in Iran, they pulled us into Syria and they have not sent a single Israeli soldier to die in any of these wars along Our side. Perhaps Congress its time to stop sucking up to your wealthy donors and call Israel what it is an occupation and Subligation of innocent Palestine’s. And thanks to Fox for blocking comments on this issue and Epstein, care of Ruppert Murdock.

  15. tell those 2 morons to get out of our country their hurting us more then help ing get rid of them no1s gonna ever vote for dems if they are there enough is enough are dems that stupid omg

  16. What is worse than Terrorists? Democrat Politicians inciting violence while trying to stop you from defending yourself against them.

  17. Just if we keep making laws that disturb the peace eventually ee can longer move. Just make it punishable with a good whip on the bum… and serious enough it changes will change the their out look on life.

  18. If you intend to make domestic terror a federal crime start by arresting half of the demoncratic congress ! That's going to take awhile due to the kicking and screaming they'll be doing . chances are after you do that all these school and mass shootings will stop and America will return to being the country we all love again ! But you won't .

  19. Terror against ICE, verbally, physically attacking Senator's in their homes. Attacking people on the street for wearing certain clothing that is political. Antifa, black lives matter, white supremacy, etc.

  20. Raise your hand if you know this well only apply to certain groups of people . kind of like how everyone only cares about the antifa idiots who do far less damage than other groups . All it is is left blaming right ,right blaming left.

  21. Please!!! From whence do we derive the term "White Nationalism?" Nationalism is not racial. We either have nationalism, or we have communism, and communism is not acceptable in a free society. Now it's easy to see through Martha McSally!!!

  22. Hell Sen. Martha Mcsally (R-AZ0 : One question: Did you and all include "Black Nationalism". Legal definition of Black Nationalism > 'A type of political thought that seeks to promote a Black Race Identity for people of 'Black Ancestry'. Did you and all include all other such groupings related to RACE and Religion having or holding a Nationalistic political ideology etc ,and so on? Just wondering ….

  23. Condemn white nationalist?? The patriots I know are of many racist. FBI Wray was real careful NOT to specify any race, as he was being race baited. Show me the facts! All violent video's I've watched were Anitfa, and they looked white hiding behind blackness, but they are not Nationalist. This lady is full of sh**

  24. Ya know what? I'm sick of these stupid women always striving to be in charge! Feminism is one big factor in whats wrong with society. Women don't know their roles anymore…

  25. Hey Martha, does this include AntiFa?…..BlackLivesMatter…..I bet not…..and, quit conflating the language….a White Nationalist is GOOD….so is a Black, Chinese, Hispanic Nationalist, as long as they are American Nationalists….A Nationalist is one who loves his country, is a patriot and believes in his country and it's sovereign right to determine its future course independent from influence or control from other entities….you know, like the United Nations, where Barrack Hussein Obama sold out the 2nd amendment and the American People on the Small Arms Treaty….thank God this President put a stop to that…why…because he is an American Nationalist…..

  26. All crimes are hate crimes. This redundancy is grandstanding. The intent, or evil mind, is a necessary element for proving the crime

  27. Thanks, Charles. And good for Martha! A virtuous woman has taken the helm on this. If men had any balls, this would have been addressed long ago. So many sell their souls for a paycheck.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *