Democrats Broach Impeachment In Bid For Robert Mueller Grand Jury Info | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

Democrats Broach Impeachment In Bid For Robert Mueller Grand Jury Info | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC


HARD TO ARGUE WITH THAT. AND THAT IS ALL FOR THIS AND THAT IS ALL FOR THIS EVENING. EVENING. THE RACHEL MADDOW STARTS NOW THE RACHEL MADDOW STARTS NOW WITH ARI MELBER. WITH ARI MELBER.>>>WE ARE IN A BREAKING NEWS,>>>WE ARE IN A BREAKING NEWS, WE HAVE GOT A RULING FROM THE WE HAVE GOT A RULING FROM THE SUPREME COURT. SUPREME COURT. IT’S NOT A FULL VICTORY FOR THE IT’S NOT A FULL VICTORY FOR THE ADMINISTRATION BUT IT DOES ADMINISTRATION BUT IT DOES REOPEN A DOOR, AND WE HAVE MORE REOPEN A DOOR, AND WE HAVE MORE LATER. LATER. DONALD TRUMP USING EXECUTIVE DONALD TRUMP USING EXECUTIVE POWER TO UNDERCUT SCIENCE. POWER TO UNDERCUT SCIENCE. THIS IS A STORY YOU MAY NOT HAVE THIS IS A STORY YOU MAY NOT HAVE HEARD ABOUT ANYWHERE ELSE TODAY. HEARD ABOUT ANYWHERE ELSE TODAY. THE REPORTER WHO BROKE IT WILL THE REPORTER WHO BROKE IT WILL JOIN US LIVE THIS HOUR. JOIN US LIVE THIS HOUR. SO WE HAVE ALL OF THAT, BUT WE SO WE HAVE ALL OF THAT, BUT WE BEGIN ON CAPITOL HILL WHERE BEGIN ON CAPITOL HILL WHERE THERE ARE ACTUALLY NEW STEPS THERE ARE ACTUALLY NEW STEPS TOWARDS AN IMPEACHMENT PROBE. TOWARDS AN IMPEACHMENT PROBE. NOW, THAT IS NOT WHAT THE NOW, THAT IS NOT WHAT THE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM HELD WOULD CONVENTIONAL WISDOM HELD WOULD HAPPEN WHEN SPECIAL COUNSEL HAPPEN WHEN SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT MUELLER FINISHED ROBERT MUELLER FINISHED TESTIFYING WEDNESDAY BUT NOW AS TESTIFYING WEDNESDAY BUT NOW AS THE WEEKENDS, THE NUMBERS OF THE WEEKENDS, THE NUMBERS OF DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS MEMBERS DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS MEMBERS BACKING AN IMPEACHMENT PROBE HAS BACKING AN IMPEACHMENT PROBE HAS GROWN AS THE CHAIRMAN WHO WOULD GROWN AS THE CHAIRMAN WHO WOULD LEAD, JERRY NADLER IS FORMALLY LEAD, JERRY NADLER IS FORMALLY INVOKING THE I WORD IN A COUNT. INVOKING THE I WORD IN A COUNT. FIVE HOUSE DEMOCRATS HAVE FIVE HOUSE DEMOCRATS HAVE STEPPED OUT IN FAVOR OF AN STEPPED OUT IN FAVOR OF AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY, INCLUDING IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY, INCLUDING CONGRESSWOMAN KATHERINE CLARK OF CONGRESSWOMAN KATHERINE CLARK OF MASSACHUSETTS, A MEMBER OF THE MASSACHUSETTS, A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE LEADERSHIP, AND THE HOUSE LEADERSHIP, AND THE HIGHEST RANKING DEMOCRAT TO HIGHEST RANKING DEMOCRAT TO PUBLICLY TAKE THIS STANCE. PUBLICLY TAKE THIS STANCE. THEN YOU HAVE THREE MORE HOUSE THEN YOU HAVE THREE MORE HOUSE DEMOCRATS TODAY ANNOUNCING DEMOCRATS TODAY ANNOUNCING SUPPORT FOR AN IMPEACHMENT SUPPORT FOR AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. INQUIRY. ANNIE CUSTER, CHRIS POMPOUS OF ANNIE CUSTER, CHRIS POMPOUS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, AND MIKE ELEVEN NEW HAMPSHIRE, AND MIKE ELEVEN OF CALIFORNIA. OF CALIFORNIA. YOU THAT I CAN THAT TOGETHER, YOU THAT I CAN THAT TOGETHER, AND NOW YOU HAVE ABOUT A HUNDRED AND NOW YOU HAVE ABOUT A HUNDRED DEMOCRATS BACKING SOME KIND OF DEMOCRATS BACKING SOME KIND OF IMPEACHMENT PROBE. IMPEACHMENT PROBE. THAT IS THE RAW TALLY. THAT IS THE RAW TALLY. THE POLITICAL NOSE COUNTING THE POLITICAL NOSE COUNTING CONTEXT OF THIS, AND FOR THE CONTEXT OF THIS, AND FOR THE HOUSE DEMOCRATS, THOUGH, THAT’S HOUSE DEMOCRATS, THOUGH, THAT’S NOT ALL BECAUSE THERE IS A NEW NOT ALL BECAUSE THERE IS A NEW LEGAL MOVE AS THEY TRY TO PRY LEGAL MOVE AS THEY TRY TO PRY MORE EVIDENCE LOOSE FROM THE MORE EVIDENCE LOOSE FROM THE WHITE HOUSE AND JUSTICE WHITE HOUSE AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TAKING THEIR CASE TO DEPARTMENT TAKING THEIR CASE TO COURT TO GET REDACTED GRAND JURY COURT TO GET REDACTED GRAND JURY MATERIAL. MATERIAL. THIS IS THE STUFF THAT ACTUALLY THIS IS THE STUFF THAT ACTUALLY INFORMED THE GRIST OF THE INFORMED THE GRIST OF THE NARRATIVES UNTIL THE MUELLER NARRATIVES UNTIL THE MUELLER REPORT, AND IT PICKS UP THE REPORT, AND IT PICKS UP THE FIGHT OVER THE VERY WAYS THAT FIGHT OVER THE VERY WAYS THAT ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR HELD BACK ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR HELD BACK PARTS OF THIS REPORT. PARTS OF THIS REPORT. WE ALL REMEMBER THE REDACTIONS WE ALL REMEMBER THE REDACTIONS AND HE DID ALLOW MEMBERS OF AND HE DID ALLOW MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO SEE BEHIND SOME OF CONGRESS TO SEE BEHIND SOME OF THESE REDACTED PAGES, SO MEMBERS THESE REDACTED PAGES, SO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS HAVE ALREADY SEEN OF CONGRESS HAVE ALREADY SEEN MORE THAN, SAY, AVERAGE MORE THAN, SAY, AVERAGE CITIZENS, BUT MR. BARR NEVER LET CITIZENS, BUT MR. BARR NEVER LET ANYONE SEE THE GRAND JURY ANYONE SEE THE GRAND JURY INFORMATION. INFORMATION. AND WHILE THIS MATERIAL IS AND WHILE THIS MATERIAL IS GENERALLY RESTRICTED FROM THE GENERALLY RESTRICTED FROM THE PUBLIC, IT’S NOT ALWAYS PUBLIC, IT’S NOT ALWAYS RESTRICTED FROM THESE MEMBERS OF RESTRICTED FROM THESE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. CONGRESS. YOU CAN THINK ABOUT RECENT YOU CAN THINK ABOUT RECENT HISTORY, REPUBLICANS WELCOMED HISTORY, REPUBLICANS WELCOMED IT, THAT SAME KIND OF GRAND JURY IT, THAT SAME KIND OF GRAND JURY MATERIAL WHEN KEN STARR HANDED MATERIAL WHEN KEN STARR HANDED OVER NOT ONLY A REPORT BUT ALL OVER NOT ONLY A REPORT BUT ALL OF HIS GRAND JURY MATERIAL, NO OF HIS GRAND JURY MATERIAL, NO REDACTIONS, NO DELAYS THAT TIME, REDACTIONS, NO DELAYS THAT TIME, SO NOW YOU HAVE HOUSE DEMOCRATS SO NOW YOU HAVE HOUSE DEMOCRATS INSISTING THEY NEED THE SAME INSISTING THEY NEED THE SAME TOOP TOOP TYPE OF MATERIAL FOR THEIR WORK TYPE OF MATERIAL FOR THEIR WORK AS A COEQUAL BRANCH OF AS A COEQUAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENTS THIS IS NOT A GOVERNMENTS THIS IS NOT A THEORETICAL DEBATE. THEORETICAL DEBATE. THIS IS THE BASIS OF THE THIS IS THE BASIS OF THE HARDBALL OF HOLDING MR. BARR IN HARDBALL OF HOLDING MR. BARR IN CONTEMPT, AND FOR THE LEGAL CONTEMPT, AND FOR THE LEGAL CASE. CASE. DEMOCRATS PRESSING THEY MUST GET DEMOCRATS PRESSING THEY MUST GET THE MATERIAL SO THEY CAN THE MATERIAL SO THEY CAN PROPERLY CARRY OUT THEIR PROPERLY CARRY OUT THEIR INVESTIGATIONS OF THE PRESIDENT INVESTIGATIONS OF THE PRESIDENT AND HIS CAMPAIGN. AND HIS CAMPAIGN.>>YOU ALSO DESCRIBED IN YOUR>>YOU ALSO DESCRIBED IN YOUR REPORT THAT THE THEN TRUMP REPORT THAT THE THEN TRUMP CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN PAUL MANAFORT CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN PAUL MANAFORT SHARED WITH A RUSSIAN OPERATIVE, SHARED WITH A RUSSIAN OPERATIVE, KILIMNIK, THE CAMPAIGN STRATEGY KILIMNIK, THE CAMPAIGN STRATEGY FOR WINNING DEMOCRATIC VOTES IN FOR WINNING DEMOCRATIC VOTES IN MID WESTERN STATES, AN INTERNAL MID WESTERN STATES, AN INTERNAL POLLING DATA OF THE CAMPAIGN, POLLING DATA OF THE CAMPAIGN, ISN’T THAT CORRECT? ISN’T THAT CORRECT?>>CORRECT.>>CORRECT.>>DID YOUR INVESTIGATION>>DID YOUR INVESTIGATION DETERMINE WHO REQUESTED THE DETERMINE WHO REQUESTED THE POLLING DATA TO BE SHARED WITH POLLING DATA TO BE SHARED WITH KILIMNIK? KILIMNIK?>>I WOULD DIRECT YOU TO THE>>I WOULD DIRECT YOU TO THE REPORT. REPORT. WHAT WE HAVE IN THE REPORT WITH WHAT WE HAVE IN THE REPORT WITH REGARD TO THAT PARTICULAR ISSUE. REGARD TO THAT PARTICULAR ISSUE.>>WE DON’T HAVE THE REDACTED>>WE DON’T HAVE THE REDACTED VERSION. VERSION. THAT’S MAYBE ANOTHER REASON WHY THAT’S MAYBE ANOTHER REASON WHY WE SHOULD GET THAT VERY VOLUME WE SHOULD GET THAT VERY VOLUME ONE. ONE.>>WE DON’T HAVE THE REDACTED>>WE DON’T HAVE THE REDACTED VERSION. VERSION. MAYBE WE SHOULD GET THAT, MAYBE WE SHOULD GET THAT, BECAUSE IN THE REPORT OR THE BECAUSE IN THE REPORT OR THE VERSION THAT CONGRESS GOT AND WE VERSION THAT CONGRESS GOT AND WE HAVE SEEN PUBLICLY, THERE IS HAVE SEEN PUBLICLY, THERE IS INFORMATION POTENTIALLY INFORMATION POTENTIALLY REVEALING WHO IT WAS THAT REVEALING WHO IT WAS THAT REQUESTED TRUMP CAMPAIGN REQUESTED TRUMP CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN PAUL MANAFORT SHARE CHAIRMAN PAUL MANAFORT SHARE THIS PRIZE INTERNAL POLLING DATA THIS PRIZE INTERNAL POLLING DATA WITH THE RUSSIAN OPERATIVE, AND WITH THE RUSSIAN OPERATIVE, AND PERHAPS WHY, BECAUSE YOWU SEE PERHAPS WHY, BECAUSE YOWU SEE THERE, WE KNOW WHAT WAS ALLUDED THERE, WE KNOW WHAT WAS ALLUDED TO. TO. IT IS REDACTED. IT IS REDACTED. THE REASON IT WAS REDACTED IS THE REASON IT WAS REDACTED IS BECAUSE OF GRAND JURY MATERIAL. BECAUSE OF GRAND JURY MATERIAL. NOW, IN THE COURT FILING TODAY, NOW, IN THE COURT FILING TODAY, THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ARGUES THERE ARE SEVERAL ARGUES THERE ARE SEVERAL EPISODES THAT HAVE THIS KIND OF EPISODES THAT HAVE THIS KIND OF INFORMATION REDACTED AND THE INFORMATION REDACTED AND THE COMMITTEE NEEDS IT. COMMITTEE NEEDS IT. THEY NEED IT BECAUSE THE DOJ THEY NEED IT BECAUSE THE DOJ WILL NOT ALLOW PROSECUTION OF A WILL NOT ALLOW PROSECUTION OF A SITTING PRESIDENT AND THEY SITTING PRESIDENT AND THEY EXPLAINED THE HOUSE IS THE ONLY EXPLAINED THE HOUSE IS THE ONLY INSTITUTION OF THE FEDERAL INSTITUTION OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT CAN NOW HOLD GOVERNMENT THAT CAN NOW HOLD PRESIDENT TRUMP ACCOUNTABLE FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP ACCOUNTABLE FOR THESE ACTIONS. THESE ACTIONS. THEY ALSO POINT TO THE PLANNED THEY ALSO POINT TO THE PLANNED QUESTIONING OF FORMER WHITE QUESTIONING OF FORMER WHITE HOUSE COUNSELLING DON McGAHN, HOUSE COUNSELLING DON McGAHN, THE STAR WITNESS OF THE MUELLER THE STAR WITNESS OF THE MUELLER REPORT CITED OVER 150 TIMES. REPORT CITED OVER 150 TIMES. HOUSE JUDICIARY MAKING THE CASE HOUSE JUDICIARY MAKING THE CASE IF THERE IS GRAND JURY TESTIMONY IF THERE IS GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF THE PRESIDENT’S KNOWLEDGE OF OF THE PRESIDENT’S KNOWLEDGE OF THESE EVENTS AND HOW HIS THESE EVENTS AND HOW HIS CAMPAIGN APPROACHED ALL OF IT, CAMPAIGN APPROACHED ALL OF IT, THAT WOULD SHED LIGHT ON WHAT THAT WOULD SHED LIGHT ON WHAT THE PRESIDENT MIGHT HAVE BEEN THE PRESIDENT MIGHT HAVE BEEN TRYING TO COVER UP WITH HIS TRYING TO COVER UP WITH HIS REPEATED ATTEMPTS TO OF COURSE REPEATED ATTEMPTS TO OF COURSE INTERFERE WITH AND OBSTRUCT THE INTERFERE WITH AND OBSTRUCT THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION. MUELLER INVESTIGATION. THOSE ATTEMPTS MADE, YES, BACK THOSE ATTEMPTS MADE, YES, BACK THROUGH MR. McGAHN. THROUGH MR. McGAHN. HIS TESTIMONY HAS BEEN BLOCKED HIS TESTIMONY HAS BEEN BLOCKED BY THE WHITE HOUSE. BY THE WHITE HOUSE. JUDICIARY CHAIRMAN JERRY NADLER JUDICIARY CHAIRMAN JERRY NADLER ANNOUNCING TODAY, COMPELLING ANNOUNCING TODAY, COMPELLING McGAHN’S TESTIMONY IS THE NEXT McGAHN’S TESTIMONY IS THE NEXT LEGAL BATTLE. LEGAL BATTLE. ALL OF THAT TOGETHER IS THE ALL OF THAT TOGETHER IS THE WHAT, THE EVIDENCE. WHAT, THE EVIDENCE. IN COURT, MORE THAN IN POLITICS, IN COURT, MORE THAN IN POLITICS, IT’S NOT JUST THE WHAT, IT’S THE IT’S NOT JUST THE WHAT, IT’S THE WHY. WHY. WHY DO YOU GET TYPICALLY SECRET WHY DO YOU GET TYPICALLY SECRET EVIDENCE? EVIDENCE? WHAT IS THE AUTHORITY. WHAT IS THE AUTHORITY. WHERE IN LAW OR THE CONSTITUTION WHERE IN LAW OR THE CONSTITUTION DOES IT GIVE CONGRESS THIS KIND DOES IT GIVE CONGRESS THIS KIND OF POWER? OF POWER? AND IS IT SO CLEAR THAT A JUDGE AND IS IT SO CLEAR THAT A JUDGE CAN THEN ORDER AROUND THE DOJ OR CAN THEN ORDER AROUND THE DOJ OR WHO’S TO PROVIDE. WHO’S TO PROVIDE. THIS IS AN INTERESTING PART THIS IS AN INTERESTING PART TODAY BECAUSE THE WHY, IN THIS TODAY BECAUSE THE WHY, IN THIS POTENTIAL ARCANE LEGAL BRIEF, POTENTIAL ARCANE LEGAL BRIEF, THE WHY WENT OFF LIKE A ROCKET THE WHY WENT OFF LIKE A ROCKET TODAY. TODAY. THE WHY IS THE IMPEACHMENT THE WHY IS THE IMPEACHMENT POWER. POWER. WHICH IS IN THE CONSTITUTION. WHICH IS IN THE CONSTITUTION. IT’S ONE OF CONGRESS’S GREATEST IT’S ONE OF CONGRESS’S GREATEST POTENTIAL POWERS RIGHT UP THERE POTENTIAL POWERS RIGHT UP THERE WITH MAKING WAR OR TAXES, WHICH WITH MAKING WAR OR TAXES, WHICH ARE TWO OTHER THINGS, BY THE ARE TWO OTHER THINGS, BY THE WAY, THE FOUNDERS PUT MOSTLY IN WAY, THE FOUNDERS PUT MOSTLY IN CONGRESS’S HANDS. CONGRESS’S HANDS. SO YOU HAVE THE DEMOCRATS BRIEF SO YOU HAVE THE DEMOCRATS BRIEF TODAY STATING CLEARLY THE HOUSE TODAY STATING CLEARLY THE HOUSE MUST HAVE ACCESS TO ALL THE MUST HAVE ACCESS TO ALL THE RELEVANT FACTS AND CONSIDERED RELEVANT FACTS AND CONSIDERED WHETHER TO EXERCISE FULL ARTICLE WHETHER TO EXERCISE FULL ARTICLE ONE POWERS INCLUDING A ONE POWERS INCLUDING A CONSTITUTIONAL POWER OF THE UP CONSTITUTIONAL POWER OF THE UP MOST GRAVITY. MOST GRAVITY. APPROVAL OF ARTICLES OF APPROVAL OF ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT. THERE’S THAT WORD, AND IN THIS THERE’S THAT WORD, AND IN THIS NEW FILING, THE COMMITTEE ARGUES NEW FILING, THE COMMITTEE ARGUES HERE BASICALLY FOR THE FIRST HERE BASICALLY FOR THE FIRST TIME IT IS ENTITLED TO THE GRAND TIME IT IS ENTITLED TO THE GRAND JURY MATERIALS UNDER THIS VERY JURY MATERIALS UNDER THIS VERY SPECIFIC EXCEPTION TO GRAND JURY SPECIFIC EXCEPTION TO GRAND JURY SKEEK SKEEK SECRECY. SECRECY. THE COMMITTEE SEEKS TO USE THEM THE COMMITTEE SEEKS TO USE THEM PRELIMINARILY OR IN CONNECTION PRELIMINARILY OR IN CONNECTION WITH A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING, THE WITH A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING, THE COMMITTEE INVESTIGATING WHETHER COMMITTEE INVESTIGATING WHETHER TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AND THIS WHY IMPEACHMENT AND THIS WHY ARGUMENT EXPLAINS CONGRESS HAS A ARGUMENT EXPLAINS CONGRESS HAS A STRONGER HAND WHEN DEMANDING STRONGER HAND WHEN DEMANDING INFORMATION WHEN IT HAS A INFORMATION WHEN IT HAS A COMMITTEE THAT SEEKS TO USE THAT COMMITTEE THAT SEEKS TO USE THAT VERY INFORMATION LINKED TO A VERY INFORMATION LINKED TO A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING. JUDICIAL PROCEEDING. THE COMMITTEE HERE CONDUCTING THE COMMITTEE HERE CONDUCTING THIS INVESTIGATION. THIS INVESTIGATION. SO THIS IS CRUCIAL. SO THIS IS CRUCIAL. THIS IS NOT AN ASIDE. THIS IS NOT AN ASIDE. THIS IS NOT A THROW EVERY THIS IS NOT A THROW EVERY REFERENCE AT THE WALL KIND OF REFERENCE AT THE WALL KIND OF ARGUMENT. ARGUMENT. THIS IS NOT, WE REALLY WANT THIS THIS IS NOT, WE REALLY WANT THIS STUFF. STUFF. LET’S MENTION ANY POTENTIAL LET’S MENTION ANY POTENTIAL RATIONALS AND MAYBE FOOTNOTES OR RATIONALS AND MAYBE FOOTNOTES OR ARGUMENT IN THE COURT. ARGUMENT IN THE COURT. THIS IS NOW TODAY FOR THE FIRST THIS IS NOW TODAY FOR THE FIRST TIME, THE CORE OF WHAT THE HOUSE TIME, THE CORE OF WHAT THE HOUSE SAYS IT’S DOING. SAYS IT’S DOING. WE COULD PUT THESE HEADERS BACK WE COULD PUT THESE HEADERS BACK UP AND YOU’LL SEE FROM THE NEW UP AND YOU’LL SEE FROM THE NEW FILING, AN INVESTIGATION FILING, AN INVESTIGATION REGARDING IMPEACHMENT IS REGARDING IMPEACHMENT IS PRELIMINARY TO JUDICIAL PRELIMINARY TO JUDICIAL PROCEEDING THE DEMOCRATS SAY, OR PROCEEDING THE DEMOCRATS SAY, OR THIS OTHER HEADING, JUDICIARY THIS OTHER HEADING, JUDICIARY COMMITTEES INVESTIGATING WHETHER COMMITTEES INVESTIGATING WHETHER TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT. AND JUST TO DRIVE THE POINT AND JUST TO DRIVE THE POINT HOME, THEY EVEN QUOTE THE HOME, THEY EVEN QUOTE THE CHAIRMAN OF THE HOUSE JUDICIARY CHAIRMAN OF THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN 1974, ALLOWING THE COMMITTEE IN 1974, ALLOWING THE JUDGE TO REQUEST GRAND JURY JUDGE TO REQUEST GRAND JURY MATERIALS, AND THE JUDGES 74 MATERIALS, AND THE JUDGES 74 ORDER RELEASING GRAND JURY ORDER RELEASING GRAND JURY MATERIAL. MATERIAL. AS A STRATEGY, THIS WHOLE OPTION AS A STRATEGY, THIS WHOLE OPTION HAS LONG BEEN AVAILABLE AND HAS LONG BEEN AVAILABLE AND THAT’S KNOWN NOT ONLY TO LAWYERS THAT’S KNOWN NOT ONLY TO LAWYERS OR WATERGATE EXPERTS, IT’S OR WATERGATE EXPERTS, IT’S PROBABLY KNOWN TO YOU AS A NEWS PROBABLY KNOWN TO YOU AS A NEWS CONSUMER. CONSUMER. RACHEL HAS REPORTED ON HOW THE RACHEL HAS REPORTED ON HOW THE BEST LEGAL ARGUMENT FOR GETTING BEST LEGAL ARGUMENT FOR GETTING THE GRAND JURY MATERIAL IS FOR THE GRAND JURY MATERIAL IS FOR DEMOCRATS TO ESTABLISH THAT THEY DEMOCRATS TO ESTABLISH THAT THEY ARE IN THE AM BIT OF A JISH ARE IN THE AM BIT OF A JISH PROCEEDING, AKA AN IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING, AKA AN IMPEACHMENT PROBE. PROBE. CONGRESS IS GIVING ITSELF A SIX CONGRESS IS GIVING ITSELF A SIX WEEKS RECESS AND LET’S BE WEEKS RECESS AND LET’S BE HONEST, THIS ISN’T MAYBE THE HONEST, THIS ISN’T MAYBE THE TYPICAL WAY THAT POLITICAL TYPICAL WAY THAT POLITICAL PARTIES ANNOUNCE A FORMAL PARTIES ANNOUNCE A FORMAL IMPEACHMENT PROBE, ESPECIALLY IMPEACHMENT PROBE, ESPECIALLY WITH A SPEAKER WHO KEEPS TAMPING WITH A SPEAKER WHO KEEPS TAMPING DOWN EXPECTATIONS FOR ALL OF DOWN EXPECTATIONS FOR ALL OF THIS. THIS. SO WHAT IS THIS. SO WHAT IS THIS. IS THIS A STEP TOWARDS AN IS THIS A STEP TOWARDS AN IMPEACHMENT PROBE OR A IMPEACHMENT PROBE OR A PREIMPEACHMENT STRATEGY? PREIMPEACHMENT STRATEGY? OR SOME KIND OF ONRAMP TO OR SOME KIND OF ONRAMP TO IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT. IS IMPEACHMENT A SPECTRUM? IS IMPEACHMENT A SPECTRUM? WELL, THE EXPLANATION AT TODAY’S WELL, THE EXPLANATION AT TODAY’S JUDICIARY COMMITTEE PRESS JUDICIARY COMMITTEE PRESS CONFERENCE SORT OF RANGED. CONFERENCE SORT OF RANGED.>>GIVEN WHAT YOU HAVE SAID>>GIVEN WHAT YOU HAVE SAID ABOUT THIS FILING, COMMENTS THAT ABOUT THIS FILING, COMMENTS THAT YOU HAVE MADE IN HEARINGS IN YOU HAVE MADE IN HEARINGS IN RECENT WEEKS, ARE YOU ALL RECENT WEEKS, ARE YOU ALL BEGINNING TO SHADE INTO AN BEGINNING TO SHADE INTO AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY EVEN IF YOU IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY EVEN IF YOU HAVEN’T HELD THE FORMAL VOTE OF HAVEN’T HELD THE FORMAL VOTE OF THE HOUSE? THE HOUSE? IS THAT WHAT’S GOING ON HERE? IS THAT WHAT’S GOING ON HERE?>>WHAT’S GOING ON.>>WHAT’S GOING ON.>>WE DON’T NEED IT.>>WE DON’T NEED IT.>>WHAT’S GOING ON IS I THINK>>WHAT’S GOING ON IS I THINK TOO MUCH HAS BEEN MADE OF THE TOO MUCH HAS BEEN MADE OF THE PHRASE, AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. PHRASE, AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. YOU MAY WANT TO CALL THAT AN YOU MAY WANT TO CALL THAT AN INQUIRY OR NOT. INQUIRY OR NOT. WHETHER YOU CALL THAT AN INQUIRY WHETHER YOU CALL THAT AN INQUIRY OR WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT, OR WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT, THAT’S WHAT WE HAVE BEEN DOING THAT’S WHAT WE HAVE BEEN DOING AND ARE DOING AND WILL CONTINUE AND ARE DOING AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO. TO DO.>>YOU’RE SAYING THERE’S NO>>YOU’RE SAYING THERE’S NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT YOU’RE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT YOU’RE DOING NOW AND AN IMPEACHMENT DOING NOW AND AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY, RIGHT? INQUIRY, RIGHT?>>IN EFFECT.>>IN EFFECT. A LOT OF PEOPLE BELIEVE WE HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE BELIEVE WE HAVE BEEN IN AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY BEEN IN AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY EVER SINCE WE STARTED LOOKING EVER SINCE WE STARTED LOOKING INTO POTENTIAL HIGH CRIMES AND INTO POTENTIAL HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS AND THE MISCONDUCT MISDEMEANORS AND THE MISCONDUCT OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH. OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH. OTHER PEOPLE THINK AN OTHER PEOPLE THINK AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY DOESN’T IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY DOESN’T BEGIN UNTIL YOU HAVE ARTICLES OF BEGIN UNTIL YOU HAVE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, I WOULD SAY WE’RE IMPEACHMENT, I WOULD SAY WE’RE IN AN IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION. IN AN IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION.>>GOING TO COURT TODAY IS THIS>>GOING TO COURT TODAY IS THIS AN ESCALATION IN YOUR AN ESCALATION IN YOUR INVESTIGATION? INVESTIGATION?>>IT’S THE NEXT STEP IN OUR>>IT’S THE NEXT STEP IN OUR INVESTIGATION. INVESTIGATION. AND YES. AND YES. I DON’T KNOW IF YOU CALL IT AN I DON’T KNOW IF YOU CALL IT AN ESCALATION. ESCALATION.>>WE ARE NOW OFFICIALLY>>WE ARE NOW OFFICIALLY ENTERING INTO AN EXAMINATION OF ENTERING INTO AN EXAMINATION OF WHETHER OR NOT TO RECOMMEND THE WHETHER OR NOT TO RECOMMEND THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, SO WE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, SO WE HAVE CROSSED A THRESHOLD. HAVE CROSSED A THRESHOLD. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE THAT REAL I JUST WANTED TO MAKE THAT REAL CLEAR. CLEAR.>>DO YOU BELIEVE PRESIDENT>>DO YOU BELIEVE PRESIDENT TRUMP WILL ULTIMATELY LEAVE TRUMP WILL ULTIMATELY LEAVE OFFICE BEING IMPEACHED BY THIS OFFICE BEING IMPEACHED BY THIS HOUSE REGARDLESS OF TIME LINE? HOUSE REGARDLESS OF TIME LINE?>>I DON’T KNOW.>>I DON’T KNOW.>>YOU HAVE A MOMENTOUS BRIEFING>>YOU HAVE A MOMENTOUS BRIEFING THERE ENDING WITH THAT SHRUG AND THERE ENDING WITH THAT SHRUG AND THE CHAIRMAN WALKING OFF STAGE. THE CHAIRMAN WALKING OFF STAGE. ONE WAY TO LOOK AT IT IS IT’S ONE WAY TO LOOK AT IT IS IT’S VIVIDLY HONEST, YOU ASK HIM WHAT VIVIDLY HONEST, YOU ASK HIM WHAT IS THIS, HE SAYS CALL IT WHAT IS THIS, HE SAYS CALL IT WHAT YOU WANT, YOU ASK HIM WHAT WILL YOU WANT, YOU ASK HIM WHAT WILL IT LEAD TO. IT LEAD TO. AND HE SAYS I DON’T KNOW. AND HE SAYS I DON’T KNOW. ARE THERE MORE ANSWERS HERE? ARE THERE MORE ANSWERS HERE? WELL, WE HAVE AN EXTRAORDINARY WELL, WE HAVE AN EXTRAORDINARY GUEST RIGHT NOW, TO HELP GUEST RIGHT NOW, TO HELP UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS JUDICIARY UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IS DOING RIGHT NOW, COMMITTEE IS DOING RIGHT NOW, AND WHY IT MIGHT MATTER AND WHY IT MIGHT MATTER REGARDLESS OF WHAT IT’S CALLED. REGARDLESS OF WHAT IT’S CALLED. JAMIE RASKIN, A MEMBER OF THE JAMIE RASKIN, A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IS HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IS HERE ON THE SHOW. HERE ON THE SHOW. THANK YOU FOR JOINING US. THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.>>I’M DELIGHTED TO BE WITH YOU.>>I’M DELIGHTED TO BE WITH YOU.>>IS THIS AN IMPEACHMENT PROBE?>>IS THIS AN IMPEACHMENT PROBE?>>SURE.>>SURE. WE WERE JUST CONFRONTED WITH WE WERE JUST CONFRONTED WITH OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE WITH HIGH OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE WITH HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS, TEN CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS, TEN EPISODES OF OBSTRUCTION OF EPISODES OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, A PRESIDENTIAL JUSTICE, A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN HIS CAMPAIGN CANDIDATE IN HIS CAMPAIGN WELCOMING WITH OPEN ARMS, WELCOMING WITH OPEN ARMS, FOREIGN INTERFERENCE IN OUR FOREIGN INTERFERENCE IN OUR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. YOU KNOW, IF BILL CLINTON CAN BE YOU KNOW, IF BILL CLINTON CAN BE IMPEACHED FOR TELLING ONE LIE IMPEACHED FOR TELLING ONE LIE ABOUT SEX THAT’S LOW CRIMES AND ABOUT SEX THAT’S LOW CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS, THIS IS IN THE MISDEMEANORS, THIS IS IN THE CATEGORY OF HIGH CRIMES AND CATEGORY OF HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS, AND WE’RE MISDEMEANORS, AND WE’RE INVESTIGATING IT, AND WE’RE INVESTIGATING IT, AND WE’RE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHETHER TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHETHER THESE ARE HIGH CRIMES AND THESE ARE HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS THAT JUSTIFY MISDEMEANORS THAT JUSTIFY IMPEACHMENT, BUT I WOULD SAY IMPEACHMENT, BUT I WOULD SAY THAT OUR INVESTIGATIVE FUTURE THAT OUR INVESTIGATIVE FUTURE INVOLVES A LOT OF OTHER ISSUES. INVOLVES A LOT OF OTHER ISSUES. YOU KNOW, I THINK THE AMERICAN YOU KNOW, I THINK THE AMERICAN PUBLIC HAS THE SENSE THAT MONEY PUBLIC HAS THE SENSE THAT MONEY IS REALLY AT THE HEART OF THE IS REALLY AT THE HEART OF THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE, AND HE HAS TRUMP WHITE HOUSE, AND HE HAS ESSENTIALLY CONVERTED THE ESSENTIALLY CONVERTED THE PRESIDENCY INTO AN INSTRUMENT OF PRESIDENCY INTO AN INSTRUMENT OF SELF-ENRICHMENT, A MONEY MAKING SELF-ENRICHMENT, A MONEY MAKING ENTERPRISE MORE HIMSELF AND HIS ENTERPRISE MORE HIMSELF AND HIS FRIENDS. FRIENDS. WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER THE FOREIGN ARTICLE 1 SECTION 9 THE FOREIGN ARTICLE 1 SECTION 9 CLAUSE HAS BEEN VIOLATED. CLAUSE HAS BEEN VIOLATED. THERE ARE REPORTS THAT 24 THERE ARE REPORTS THAT 24 FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN FILLING DONALD TRUMP’S POCKETS FILLING DONALD TRUMP’S POCKETS THROUGH THE TRUMP HOTEL, THROUGH THROUGH THE TRUMP HOTEL, THROUGH THE OFFICE TOWER, THROUGH THE THE OFFICE TOWER, THROUGH THE GOLF COURSES, THERE’S THE GOLF COURSES, THERE’S THE DOMESTIC EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE WHICH DOMESTIC EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE WHICH SAYS HE’S LIMITED TO EARNINGIZE SAYS HE’S LIMITED TO EARNINGIZE SALARY, WE CAN’T INCREASE AND SALARY, WE CAN’T INCREASE AND DECREASE IT, YET EVERY TIME THEY DECREASE IT, YET EVERY TIME THEY GO TO MAR-A-LAGO, THEY’RE GO TO MAR-A-LAGO, THEY’RE SPENDING 75 OR $100,000 THAT SPENDING 75 OR $100,000 THAT GOES DIRECTLY FROM FROVLTEDERAL GOES DIRECTLY FROM FROVLTEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TO THE TRUMP GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TO THE TRUMP HOTEL. HOTEL. THAT I WOULD SAY SHOULD BE THE THAT I WOULD SAY SHOULD BE THE BEGINNING OF FOLLOWING THE MONEY BEGINNING OF FOLLOWING THE MONEY BUT WE REMEMBER THAT DONALD BUT WE REMEMBER THAT DONALD TRUMP SAID THAT HE WOULD TRUMP SAID THAT HE WOULD BASICALLY BLOW UP THE SPECIAL BASICALLY BLOW UP THE SPECIAL COUNSEL INVESTIGATION IF THEY COUNSEL INVESTIGATION IF THEY LOOKED AT HIS FINANCES. LOOKED AT HIS FINANCES. HE’S NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO HE’S NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO HAMSTRING THE U.S. CONGRESS IN HAMSTRING THE U.S. CONGRESS IN THE SAME WAY. THE SAME WAY. WE’RE GOING TO GET TO THE BOTTOM WE’RE GOING TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF ALL OF IT. OF ALL OF IT.>>DO YOU THINK THERE’S A HIGH>>DO YOU THINK THERE’S A HIGH CRIME THAT THE PRESIDENT CRIME THAT THE PRESIDENT OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE. OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE.>>CERTAINLY.>>CERTAINLY. MULTIPLE TIMES. MULTIPLE TIMES. EACH ONE OF THOSE EPISODES EACH ONE OF THOSE EPISODES DESCRIBED — DESCRIBED –>>IF THAT’S THE CASE, LET ME>>IF THAT’S THE CASE, LET ME PRESS YOU ON THAT. PRESS YOU ON THAT. EVERYTHING YOU JUST LAID OUT EVERYTHING YOU JUST LAID OUT VIEWERS WOULD SAY, YEAH, THAT VIEWERS WOULD SAY, YEAH, THAT SOUNDS BAD AND CERTAINLY IN THE SOUNDS BAD AND CERTAINLY IN THE CONGRESS’S AMBIT TO DO SOMETHING CONGRESS’S AMBIT TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, BUT WHY WOULD THAT ABOUT IT, BUT WHY WOULD THAT REQUIRE ANY FURTHER DELAY? REQUIRE ANY FURTHER DELAY? THERE IS A CONCERN THAT THE THERE IS A CONCERN THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE HOUSE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE HOUSE TALKED A LOT ABOUT WAITING FOR TALKED A LOT ABOUT WAITING FOR THINGS, WAITING FOR MUELLER TO THINGS, WAITING FOR MUELLER TO FINISH, AND WAITING TO GET THE FINISH, AND WAITING TO GET THE REPORT AND WAITING TO GET REPORT AND WAITING TO GET MUELLER TO TESTIFY. MUELLER TO TESTIFY. WE ARE NOW PAST ALL OF THAT, AND WE ARE NOW PAST ALL OF THAT, AND SO A CONVERSATION ABOUT THE SO A CONVERSATION ABOUT THE TRUMP HOTEL OR, YOU KNOW, TRUMP HOTEL OR, YOU KNOW, LEGITIMATE CONCERNS ABOUT LEGITIMATE CONCERNS ABOUT CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ABOUT CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ABOUT FOREIGN BRIBES MAKES SENSE BUT FOREIGN BRIBES MAKES SENSE BUT NOT NECESSARILY HAS A REASON TO NOT NECESSARILY HAS A REASON TO WAIT FURTHER TO DEAL WITH WAIT FURTHER TO DEAL WITH WHETHER OR NOT THERE’S WHETHER OR NOT THERE’S CONSEQUENCES FOR WHAT YOU DEFINE CONSEQUENCES FOR WHAT YOU DEFINE AS OBSTRUCTION. AS OBSTRUCTION.>>I’M NOT TALKING ABOUT>>I’M NOT TALKING ABOUT WAITING. WAITING. I’M TALKING ABOUT AGGRESSIVELY I’M TALKING ABOUT AGGRESSIVELY ACCELERATING OUR INVESTIGATION ACCELERATING OUR INVESTIGATION INTO ALL OF THE CORRUPTION AND INTO ALL OF THE CORRUPTION AND CRIMINALITY THAT PERVADE THE CRIMINALITY THAT PERVADE THE WHITE HOUSE AND EXECUTIVE BRANCH WHITE HOUSE AND EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. OF GOVERNMENT. MOST PEOPLE UNDERSTAND DESPITE MOST PEOPLE UNDERSTAND DESPITE DONALD TRUMP BEING ABLE TO DONALD TRUMP BEING ABLE TO GERRYMANDER THE SUBJECT MATTER GERRYMANDER THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION OF THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION THAT ALL OF THAT STARTED BECAUSE THAT ALL OF THAT STARTED BECAUSE DONALD TRUMP WANTED TO BUILD DONALD TRUMP WANTED TO BUILD A — MAKE A BILLION DOLLAR DEAL A — MAKE A BILLION DOLLAR DEAL FOR TRUMP TOWER IN MOSCOW AND FOR TRUMP TOWER IN MOSCOW AND MEANTIME WAS COLLECTING MONEY MEANTIME WAS COLLECTING MONEY THAT WAS BEING LAUNDERED FROM THAT WAS BEING LAUNDERED FROM RUSSIAN OLIGARCHS THROUGH THE RUSSIAN OLIGARCHS THROUGH THE HOTELS AND THROUGH THE VARIATION HOTELS AND THROUGH THE VARIATION BUSINESSES. BUSINESSES. THAT WAS THE GENESIS OF THE THAT WAS THE GENESIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE RUSSIANS. RELATIONSHIP WITH THE RUSSIANS. IT WAS NOT A POLITICAL IT WAS NOT A POLITICAL CONSPIRACY AS MUELLER FOUND, YOU CONSPIRACY AS MUELLER FOUND, YOU KNOW, VIEWED AND RUSSIAN KNOW, VIEWED AND RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE DID NOT NEED DONALD INTELLIGENCE DID NOT NEED DONALD TRUMP JR. AND ERIC TRUMP TO TRUMP JR. AND ERIC TRUMP TO EXECUTE THEIR PLOT AGAINST EXECUTE THEIR PLOT AGAINST AMERICA. AMERICA. THEY JUST USED THE TRUMPS BUT THEY JUST USED THE TRUMPS BUT THEY DIDN’T CONSPIRE WITH THE THEY DIDN’T CONSPIRE WITH THE TRUMPS TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. TRUMPS TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. UNFORTUNATELY THE TRUMPS NEVER UNFORTUNATELY THE TRUMPS NEVER CALLED THE FBI. CALLED THE FBI. THEY JUST SAID COME ON IN, AND THEY JUST SAID COME ON IN, AND YOU KNOW, FIND THE E-MAILS AND YOU KNOW, FIND THE E-MAILS AND DUMP THE WIKILEAKS AND SO ON. DUMP THE WIKILEAKS AND SO ON. BUT LOOK, MONEY WAS AT THE HEART BUT LOOK, MONEY WAS AT THE HEART OF IT, AND MONEY CONTINUES TO BE OF IT, AND MONEY CONTINUES TO BE AT THE HEART OF IT, AND THERE’S AT THE HEART OF IT, AND THERE’S A VERY IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL A VERY IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE HERE. PRINCIPLE HERE. OUR FOUNDERS WANTED THE OUR FOUNDERS WANTED THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, AND EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS TO AND EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS TO BE 100% DEVOTED TO THE PUBLIC BE 100% DEVOTED TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. INTEREST OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. AND NOT TO SAUDI ARABIA AND AND NOT TO SAUDI ARABIA AND UNITED ARAB EMIRATES AND TURKEY, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES AND TURKEY, AND ANY GOVERNMENT THAT COMES AND ANY GOVERNMENT THAT COMES OVER THAT DECIDES TO FILL THE OVER THAT DECIDES TO FILL THE PRESIDENT’S COFFERS. PRESIDENT’S COFFERS. THE PRESIDENCY IS NOT SUPPOSED THE PRESIDENCY IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE A MONEY MAKING OPERATION. TO BE A MONEY MAKING OPERATION. WE’VE GOT TO VINDICATE THAT WE’VE GOT TO VINDICATE THAT PRINCIPAL, BUT I AGREE WE’VE GOT PRINCIPAL, BUT I AGREE WE’VE GOT TO DO IT QUICKLY. TO DO IT QUICKLY.>>DID YOU LEARN ANYTHING FROM>>DID YOU LEARN ANYTHING FROM BOB MUELLER’S TESTIMONY THAT WAS BOB MUELLER’S TESTIMONY THAT WAS NOT IN THE REPORT. NOT IN THE REPORT.>>NO, I READ THE MUELLER REPORT>>NO, I READ THE MUELLER REPORT I THINK THREE OR FOUR DIFFERENT I THINK THREE OR FOUR DIFFERENT TIMES AND HE STUCK EXTREMELY TIMES AND HE STUCK EXTREMELY CLOSELY TO THE TEXT. CLOSELY TO THE TEXT. I THINK HE OPENED UP A BIT IN I THINK HE OPENED UP A BIT IN THE AFTERNOON WHEN HE WAS THE AFTERNOON WHEN HE WAS WILLING TO SAY THAT ALL OF THE WILLING TO SAY THAT ALL OF THE PRESIDENT’S CONDUCT WAS PRESIDENT’S CONDUCT WAS UNPATRIOTIC AND UNETHICAL AND UNPATRIOTIC AND UNETHICAL AND IMMORAL, THERE HE STRAYED, YOU IMMORAL, THERE HE STRAYED, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE OF FEET BEYOND KNOW, A COUPLE OF FEET BEYOND THE FOUR CORNERS OF THE TEXT, THE FOUR CORNERS OF THE TEXT, BUT BASICALLY WHAT HE RECITED TO BUT BASICALLY WHAT HE RECITED TO US AND CONFIRMED FOR US WERE ALL US AND CONFIRMED FOR US WERE ALL OF THESE EPISODES OF OBSTRUCTION OF THESE EPISODES OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WITH MICHAEL COHEN, OF JUSTICE WITH MICHAEL COHEN, WHERE THEY CALLED HIM UP TO TRY WHERE THEY CALLED HIM UP TO TRY TO BUTTER HIM UP TO SAY, YOU TO BUTTER HIM UP TO SAY, YOU KNOW, STAY ON THE TEAM, STICK TO KNOW, STAY ON THE TEAM, STICK TO THE PARTY LINE, AND WHEN HE THE PARTY LINE, AND WHEN HE DECIDED HE COULDN’T LIE ANYMORE DECIDED HE COULDN’T LIE ANYMORE AND SPILLED HIS GUTS AND TOLD AND SPILLED HIS GUTS AND TOLD THE TRUTH ABOUT DONALD TRUMP AND THE TRUTH ABOUT DONALD TRUMP AND THE PAYOFFS TO STORMY DANIELS THE PAYOFFS TO STORMY DANIELS AND SO ON, AT THAT POINT THEY AND SO ON, AT THAT POINT THEY TURNED ON HIM AND, YOU KNOW, TURNED ON HIM AND, YOU KNOW, TRUMP BASICALLY THREATENED TO TRUMP BASICALLY THREATENED TO DROP A DIME ON HIM SAYING WE DROP A DIME ON HIM SAYING WE KNOW ABOUT YOUR FATHER-IN-LAW, KNOW ABOUT YOUR FATHER-IN-LAW, AND WE KNOW ABOUT THIS MEMBER OF AND WE KNOW ABOUT THIS MEMBER OF YOUR FAMILY AND THAT MEMBER OF YOUR FAMILY AND THAT MEMBER OF FAMILY. FAMILY. YOU KNOW, IF THE PRESIDENT’S GOT YOU KNOW, IF THE PRESIDENT’S GOT EVIDENCE OF CRIMINALITY AMONG EVIDENCE OF CRIMINALITY AMONG HIS STAFF OR FRIENDS, HE SHOULD HIS STAFF OR FRIENDS, HE SHOULD TURN IT OVER TO THE FBI AND NOT TURN IT OVER TO THE FBI AND NOT HOLD IT IN STORE AS A FORLM OF HOLD IT IN STORE AS A FORLM OF LEVERAGE AGAINST HIM TO KEEP LEVERAGE AGAINST HIM TO KEEP THEM FROM TESTIFYING AGAINST THEM FROM TESTIFYING AGAINST HIM. HIM. THAT’S WHAT MOB BOZSSES DO. THAT’S WHAT MOB BOZSSES DO.>>CONGRESSMAN JAMIE RASKIN, ON>>CONGRESSMAN JAMIE RASKIN, ON A NIGHT WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN BUSY A NIGHT WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN BUSY AND THANK YOU FOR JOINING US. AND THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.>>THANK YOU FOR SHARING THE>>THANK YOU FOR SHARING THE STORY. STORY. I HOPE EVERYBODY GETS COMFORT I HOPE EVERYBODY GETS COMFORT NL, AND IN THE ARTICLE ONE NL, AND IN THE ARTICLE ONE BRANCH WE ARE GOING TO ZEALOUSLY BRANCH WE ARE GOING TO ZEALOUSLY UPHOLD AND DEFEND THE UPHOLD AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION. CONSTITUTION.>>YOU HEARD IT HERE.>>YOU HEARD IT HERE. AND I WISH YOU A GOOD EVENING AS AND I WISH YOU A GOOD EVENING AS WELL. WELL. LET ME TELL YOU WHAT WE HAVE IN LET ME TELL YOU WHAT WE HAVE IN STORE TONIGHT, THE DEMOCRATS ARE STORE TONIGHT, THE DEMOCRATS ARE LOOKING AT A COURT BATTLE. LOOKING AT A COURT BATTLE. WE HAVE EXPERTS ON HOW IT’S WE HAVE EXPERTS ON HOW IT’S GOING ON. GOING ON. LATER AS WE MENTIONED, BREAKING LATER AS WE MENTIONED, BREAKING NEWS LATER ON FRIDAY ABOUT THE NEWS LATER ON FRIDAY ABOUT THE BORDER WALL FROM THE SUPREME

100 thoughts on “Democrats Broach Impeachment In Bid For Robert Mueller Grand Jury Info | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

  1. MSLSD is still on a bad acid trip from the 60s. I wish they would try to fly and just get it over with, they are nuttier than a squirrel's stomach.

  2. Representative Raskin speaks with greater clarity than other Democrats. Yes, it IS all about the money. Get the unredacted material and trump's tax returns. Also, given Irakly Kaveladze was a key figure in the 2000 congressional hearing on a $1.4 BILLION dollar Russian money laundering scheme, there HAS TO BE more significance to his trump tower attendance. Given that he created the shell corporations involved, who owned the shell corporations which have purchased trump properties?

  3. The world was laughing when you impeached Clinton for a BJ fib….now the world cries and feels sorry for you, high crimes since day one and he is still in office! wow….some of your laws need to change, this is not 1776 it's 2019 and we share the planet with disgusting subhuman creatures with no morals or ethics…the entire white house is filled with them….and yet….you're still DICKING around!

  4. Every dime trump makes during his time in office should be taken back and given to seniors for home repairs. He should not be allowwed to keep his ill gotten gains.

  5. Moscow Mitch is almost worst than 45. 45 Is stupid, And most likely does this criminal activity on a daily basis. Can you charge treason for someone being stupid? Doubtful. However.. Moscow Mitch is actively, And purposely trying to stop actions that would defend against an attack. That is literally being told that we are being invaded, Here are the actions we can do to try to stop or defend, Send troops, Send Ships, Send tanks, You pick one sir.. And hey says "Just let them invade, Do nothing" THAT is treason. That is giving comfort and AID to an enemy………. Look it up REPUBLICANS… WHAT DO YOU STAND FOR ANYMORE???????????? ARE YOU NOT EMBARRASSED TO SHOW YOUR FACE IN PUBLIC?

  6. Impeach!
    Trump is not getting any better!
    He feels emboldened!
    Protect our Constitution!
    It's your job, Congress!

  7. Why do Dems talk of Democracy yet vie for absolute control of everything. Doesn't make sense except to a clown perhaps

  8. The House must take back it's power or Trump will make this his dictatorship. There are three parts of leadership power. The Senate seems to have given their power completely away already.

  9. The Democrats are still pretending they don't have all the info? They are grasping at straws to make it seem like there may be a glimmer of hope for impeachment. The lie is that they need this redacted memo. But they could change the house rules to get the unredacted memo. Why haven't they done that? They won't do it, because they need to pretend there is some unknown smoking gun. So, they are screaming out loud for this info, that they could get if they really wanted it.

  10. There will be no impeachment and you people know it. Trump will be re-elected and you people know it. There will be indictments, trials and prison sentences for many, but Trump will not be among their number. The Democrat party is headed for utter destruction. I find all of this very humorous.

  11. The only time Trump was not lying when he said he was fu**ed after Mueller was named to conduct the investigations

  12. Unfortunately Mr. Raskin did not explain Ari's question about why the further delays to into Trumps impeachment inquiry and he stated there were ten episodes of obstruction of justice by Trump where there are at least fourteen. This is just more stonewalling. And at the end of the part where Nadler is questioned he replies "I don't know". At this point, ANYONE who doesn't take a stand directly for trumps impeachment should be charged with obstruction of justice!

  13. Still talking about impeachment 😂 y’all are gonna lose in 2020 if y’all don’t get ur shyt together

  14. Mueller didn't EXONERATE President Trump. Morons, learn something about the world and the truth
    https://youtu.be/ueCE3EZuUHM

  15. House Democrats need to punt or go for a two point conversion. Once you get the grand material and evidence is there to convict win place or show go with impeachment.

  16. Here is the problem, trump does not nkow the constitution and rule of chech and balances, he went over all these rules and now we find out that the congress and house of reprentatives did not not that somewere their was a book to keep democracy, some of them had never seen these book, jajaja by the time they find the book trump will be far far alway, but if you get a trafic ticket you wil be treatned to go to jail

  17. I am applauded. An unindicted felon 45th who is terrorizing his own citizens….but we are still debating whether he needs to be impeached. Shame on this Congress of this USA especially the complicit Senate GOP protecting the garbage 45th!

  18. Imagine being a liberal and being wrong on just about every Major subject. Russia, impeachment, Brexit, The wall, the election, jussie smollet, Mueller…

  19. It is impossible to undercut science, maybe you can cut the funding for research but it is impossible to undercut science.

  20. Don't bait me with Rachel and her smiles about Trumps fails of the day when it's actually ari.. DAYUM.. I like him but, Rachel =|

  21. What bothers me about Pelosi's foot-dragging isn't her triangulation, it's that she was helping this traitor slow-walk the proceedings. It would have been very simple for her to say they were starting impeachment because there was no other way to get the evidence the administration was trying to hide. The Woman baffles me. I don't think she should serve another term. Get someone younger in there.

  22. Open impeachment hearings on McConnell not allowing bill to pass against sanctions against Russia, and then receiving by Russian oligarch from aluminum company he owns to open a plant of this Russian business in Kentucky for not allowing sanctions. As well as investigate why McConnell will not let any bills on election security be allowed. If he is not a traitor to our country and democracy, he has nothing to hide, but as majority leader with this power , he is a national security risk and should be removed from power and this position. Any Republican who is in support of him at this time needs to go too. You all took an oath and are betraying American people and our institutions.

  23. Trump is not exonerated? Are you serious, Chris Wallace? Now, regarding to Trump-Russia collusion hoax, tell us how many more investigations we need to exonerate Trump! Four independent reports are not enough? In addition to Mueller report with a team of 18 Trump hating angry Democrats, there were 3 more separate investigations related Russia collusion, carried out independently by FBI, House Intelligence Committee and Senate Intelligence Committee. Surprisingly, those 4 independent investigations all consistently led to the same conclusion that found insufficient evidence to prove any collusion or obstruction ever existed. Most surprisingly, one Democratic aid of the bipartisan Senate investigation went so far as to say, "We were never going to find a contract signed in blood saying, 'Hey Vlad, we're going to collude.'" Now, the Russia collusion witch hunt has totally collapsed. This eventually not only exonerated but also vindicated Trump , who is in fact an innocent man winning the historic election fair and square, but the despicable Democrats dementedly continue piling on lie after lie to flagrantly mislead the American public and to viciously slander and libel Trump. Unlike all 4 independent investigations including Mueller report finding NO solid evidence to prove Trump guilty of any charges, Ken Starr investigation found Bill Clinton guilty of 11 serious charges (5 counts of lying under oath, 4 counts of obstruction of justice, 1 count of witness tampering and 1 count of abuse of constitutional authority), which led to Bill Clinton's impeachment by the United States House of Representatives. Now, how many more investigations related to Trump-Russia witch hunt do we need to exonerate Trump? You tell us. Go ahead!

  24. Now that Republican mobsters have taken over SCOTUS, they are rushing to appoint justices who are in fact operatives who will condone meddling with voter rights, voter obstruction and tinkering with voting machines and fake vote counting. All for $5000 billion more for their sponsors. The dogs are now racing to push the sheep over the dam so that they can be slaughtered. And the sheep? They talk and talk and go on holiday and go to the next art exhibition and talk some more. Republicans act, Democrats talk. That is the big difference. You can predict who will prevail.

  25. OMG
    msnbc still pushing this nonsense
    how long will you carry on this war against the elected president?
    how long will you remain the puppet to your corporate puppet masters?
    LOSERS!!!

  26. This comment section looks like a "Bill Clinton's impeachment trial email- thread", back in the day….Planet of the apes style.

  27. A Thug will always be caught! He could be charged when leaving office! Will he be the first leaving office being cuffed up? Will it be a violent fight or a peaceful low point in history?

  28. The committee member said "We don't have the redacted report." She meant, "We do not have the UNredacted report." The only one they have been given access to so far is the one with all the redactions.

  29. OK let's Impeach Trump but Senate Republicans will block it. So if Congress impeach on High Crimes, and Republican Senate blocks then Republican Senate aisles and abet high crimes 18 USC 2 correct me if I'm wrong but aiding and abetting criminals is a felony.

  30. Okay folks the CONSTITUTION says that the president is to protect our nation from enemies both foreign and domestic! Well Trump is attacking certain Americans on a regular basis. So I see that as a attack on our country! He has once again broke his oath office!! He is NOT PROTECTING US! HE IS DIVIDING US!!

  31. Trump and his dictator friends in Russia and North Korea and Saudia Arabia and China hold favor with this president but when it comes to his fellow Americans, all Americans are open for attack!.Okay folks that's criminal!!

  32. Yes, they said IMPEACH! Yes! Actually, Amendment 25 is more appropriate because of the dementia and paranoia and malignant narcissism.

  33. Impeachment will cause a civil war in this country. Put a limit on how long elected officials can serve in office, stop big donor's and put working people in office.

  34. 0:50 – Can we please stop saying "The 'I' word" like it's some shocking thing? Just say "impeachment", please.

  35. 11:18 – Let's not downplay Clinton's lie too much: he lied under oath, and for the purpose of impeding an investigation into his past conduct. Perjury must be treated seriously or courts cannot hope to get to the truth. I understand the point is to say "this situation is worse" and personally I agree with that, but we should not treat perjury by a US president as a footnote for reflecting on some more current situation.

  36. The Trump campaign gived the Russians the poll data to help them succeeding the flood of social media poisoning messages with a very accurate micro targeting. Cambridge Analytica designed the citizen targets and the Russian Internet Research Agency troll farm executed the mind poisoning of the Americans targets. THIS IS COLLUSION IN PLAIN SIGHT !! Throw the nazi clown in psychiatric jail NOW!

  37. This is a shame, why didn't they do this to the Clintions. They are just wasting tax payers money. The democrats need to do there jobs, every day they are not working, there work dose not get done. How many of them have spiders in there closets. No one is perfect. It is a shame how far our politicians will go. They have divided the people, our politicians, and America.

  38. These fools! Cliton, yes Cliton! Now a millionaire many times over. Obama, another one that is rich many times over from being the president. How do these fools accuse Trump to be in it for the money now that collusion don't stick. Bunch of jokes! We don't deserve this country! I mean, what do these Democrats get for doing this to Trump?

  39. Make sure you register to vote. Ensure friends family neighbors and shut ins register to vote. Make sure you and all these people know where to vote. And then VOTE VOTE VOTE the party out! Send the message you dont want this behavior in the government at ANY level

  40. PLEASE please STOP sayin "the I word" omfg! Impeachment, thats the word! Put it in place & quit tip toeing around doing what's right! This noncommittal verbiage "…I would say we're in an impeachment.." . You would?? Well, then effin SAY IT.

  41. What I would like to know is WHY the DOJ won’t allow the prosecution of a sitting President . That policy effectively puts the President above the law and invites abuse of the powers of that office, as we can plainly see is happening. And it’s not a law, correct ? I don’t agree with it at all

  42. Love the show…but..
    Your producers are lighting you differently, and it looks crummy. Despite a very nice shirt/tie combo, the lighting is glaring and stark. Nobody needs bad lighting..

  43. the USA is full on government traitor! to our country! !! Binning wit Trump! Mitch Mc Connell and LINDSEY GRAHAM! baking Trump insulting all races! except he"s own! And the other traitors! Baking what he's saying KEEPING SILENT!!! Trump fells he"s German! Or Northern Europeans Descendant???? Trump want to do! as HITLER ! WANT A BE! HITLER RAZE! FEELS HE"S RACE WERE SUPERIOR TO OTHER AS TRUMP! THINK HE"S!-–ALL RACIST TOO! A DODGE MILITARY DRAFTER! (DONALD TRUMP) UNPATRIOTIC! PATRIOT BETRAYER! SELLING AMERICA IN DIFFERENT WELL KNOWN WAYS! TO THE BEST POSTER! NAMELY AMERICA"S ENEMIES! LIKE NORTH COREA! BUT THE AMERICA MOST DANGER ENEMY! PUTIN"S RUSSIA! HE'S ACCUSING ONE OF THO MOST WELL KNOWN! AND ALWAYS PATRIOTIC! BEHAVIOR THE AMERICAN NEW YORK TIMES ! NEWS PAPER ! prove their Patriotism! for many year
    —HE"S bashing CITIES IN RALLY! WHY? HE knows those cities are not TO BACK SUSHI A CRAZY SIMPATICO! HITLER WANT A BE!! HE'S AMBITION FOLLOW THE MODEL! HE'S ADMIRING! A NORTH COREA DICTATOR! THAT: HE"S MODEL ON A GOVERNMENT IDEAL! AS HE WANT TO DO! HERE IN OUR USA! –
    JUST IMAGEN THAT DICTATOR! GOVERNING "AMERICA" CAN YOU????

  44. MAKING A GREAT BUSINESSES IN THE PRESIDENCY SINCE BEFORE AND AND DURING And AFTER! THE ELECTIONS!! SO IT HAS BEEN CONSTANTLY!! A BUSINESS AFTER BUSINESS IN ALL HE CAN EXCHANGE FOR FAMILY DOLLARS AND POWER!!

  45. Impeachment keeps the Republican swamptrumpers still in power. Pence? Wait investigate and elect a democrat executive staff.

  46. check out the front page of Haaretz today (aug 7 2019) – Nancy Pelosi and Sten Hoyer in Israel reaffirming their support for Israel – same front page says Israel just approved 2000 new settlement units – and then there is this regarding trump – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFlWLSrcBqQ   – Israel/Netanyahu  loves trump Netanyahu named a settlement town after him – Trump Heights – so Nancy cannot impeach trump because she supports Israel, doesn't matter what happens in America if you support Israel first, in my opinion. The charade continues and Americans fight each other over dem and rep.

  47. Can somebody please answer me a question? What make it okay for J Edgar Hoover to withhold secrets on people? And get a building named after him. But now they want to talk about Donald Trump doing it. And I am not a Donald Trump supporter. Elizabeth Warren all the way.

  48. I am puzzled does the name of this organization reveal something…. MS NBC Is that MS 13 NBC… There are no coincidences…

  49. LMAO
    Whatever happened to Russian collusion? Holy Balls!!! Now they're talking about the man staying in his own hotels? Good grief. Call Jerry Nadler GO!!! #gojerrynadlergo

  50. Jamie Raskin should be screaming from the rafters about the great bipartisan bill they just got thru the house (July 24)- why isn't he????  More importantly why isn't MSNBC covering it?? The American press is supposed to be bringing these things to the people so they know what is going on and they haven't. Nancy and the dems (exception, the squad) priority has been working on this – the great deal of the century where America gives up it's independence to partner formally with Israel in all things (along with 3 companion bills) – America will no longer be independent from Israel in any way, in my opinion – Israel loves trump – Nancy went to Israel during the August recess to reassure them – not us –  of her support. She and the 294 house members that voted for this will never impeach trump no matter what he does , including shooting someone on 5th Ave. It's not the American people that aren't ready for impeachment it is the House we voted for to do it that is not ready.  There is no bi partisan problem – Majority of Dems have the same goal as the majority of Reps – this is truly a charade. PLEASE READ (the letters at the bottom – it shows how all dems waived their job of determining the impact of this in favor of expediting) – US HR1837 United States-Israel Cooperation Enhancement and Regional Security Act.   1st part shown below – it needs reading all the way through along with companion bills to grasp the overarching breadth of what we are agreeing to.I know we are not supposed to question anything that has to do with Israel – but this is not about Israel, it is about American independence – period. I don't think the founders would have agreed to this with ANY foreign country. in my opinion, while I am still allowed to have one.
    https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2019/07/23/house-section/article/H7188-1      – read it here

    UNITED STATES-ISRAEL COOPERATION ENHANCEMENT AND REGIONAL SECURITY ACT; Congressional Record Vol. 165, No. 124
        (House of Representatives – July 23, 2019)Text available as:         TXTPDF             View TXT in new window              Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.[Pages H7188-H7198]
    From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    {time} 1615
    UNITED STATES-ISRAEL COOPERATION ENHANCEMENT AND REGIONAL SECURITY ACT

    Mr. ENGEL. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill
    (H.R. 1837) to make improvements to certain defense and security
    assistance provisions and to authorize assistance for Israel, and for
    other purposes, as amended.
    The Clerk read the title of the bill.
    The text of the bill is as follows:

    H.R. 1837

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
    the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.–This Act may be cited as the “United
    States-Israel Cooperation Enhancement and Regional Security
    Act''.
    (b) Table of Contents.–The table of contents for this Act
    is as follows:
    Sec. 1. Short title and table of contents.

    TITLE I–ENHANCED COOPERATION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND ISRAEL

    Sec. 101. Coordinator of United States-Israel Research and Development.
    Sec. 102. Cooperation on directed energy capabilities.
    Sec. 103. Cooperation on cybersecurity.
    Sec. 104. Report on potential benefits and impact to the United States
    of establishing a joint United States-Israel
    Cybersecurity Center of Excellence.
    Sec. 105. Cyber diplomacy officer.
    Sec. 106. United States Agency for International Development
    Memorandum-Israel enhanced cooperation.
    Sec. 107. Cooperative projects among the United States, Israel, and
    developing countries.
    Sec. 108. Joint cooperative program related to innovation and high-tech
    for the Middle East region.
    Sec. 109. Sense of Congress on Eastern Mediterranean energy
    cooperation.
    Sec. 110. Cooperation on other matters.

    TITLE II–SECURITY ASSISTANCE FOR ISRAEL

    Sec. 201. Findings.
    Sec. 202. Statement of policy.
    Sec. 203. Contingency plans to provide Israel with necessary defense
    articles and services.
    Sec. 204. Waiver for existing or imminent military threat to Israel.
    Sec. 205. Security assistance for Israel.
    Sec. 206. Joint assessment of quantity of precision guided munitions
    for use by Israel.
    Sec. 207. Transfer of precision guided munitions to Israel.
    Sec. 208. Sense of Congress on rapid acquisition and deployment
    procedures.

    [[Page H7189]]

    Sec. 209. Extension of War Reserves Stockpile authority.
    Sec. 210. Eligibility of Israel for the strategic trade authorization
    exception to certain export control licensing
    requirements.
    Sec. 211. Extension of loan guarantees to Israel.
    Sec. 212. Definition.

    TITLE III–JUSTICE FOR UNITED STATES VICTIMS OF PALESTINIAN TERRORISM

    Sec. 301. Short title.
    Sec. 302. Facilitation of the settlement of terrorism-related claims of
    nationals of the United States.
    Sec. 303. Modification to consent of certain parties to personal
    jurisdiction.

    TITLE IV–BUDGETARY EFFECTS

    Sec. 401. Determination of budgetary effects.

    TITLE I–ENHANCED COOPERATION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND ISRAEL

    SEC. 101. COORDINATOR OF UNITED STATES-ISRAEL RESEARCH AND
    DEVELOPMENT.

    (a) In General.–The President is encouraged to designate
    the Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Oceans and
    International Environmental and Scientific Affairs to act as
    Coordinator of United States-Israel Research and Development
    (in this section referred to as the “Coordinator'').
    (b) Authorities and Duties.–The Coordinator, in
    conjunction with the heads of relevant Federal Government
    departments and agencies and in coordination with the Israel
    Innovation Authority, shall oversee civilian science and
    technology programs on a joint basis with Israel.
    (c) Report.–Not later than one year after the date of the
    enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the
    Coordinator shall submit to the appropriate congressional
    committees a report on the implementation of this section.
    (d) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.–In this
    section, the term “appropriate congressional committees''
    means–
    (1) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on
    Science, Space, and Technology of the House of
    Representatives; and
    (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on
    Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.

  51. No such thing as climate change only with the seasons so go f yourself But l'm white, old, they call me all kinds of names': Iowan tells Racist MSNBC to 'guess' who he is voting for.

  52. 'm white, old, they call me all kinds of names': Iowan tells racist MSNBC to 'guess' who he is voting fot August 12, 2019 12:47 PM

  53. ************* DONALD TRUMP IS RUNNING MSNBC THROUGH THE RINGER. THE "RUSSIAN HOAX" IS DEAD. YOUR CREDIBILITY IS GONE. THE DESPERATION AND PANIC ARE SETTING IN. *****************

  54. Fact check this. Mostly Lies! Run – don't walk away from the Democratic Propaganda Machine. Support Trump 2020!

  55. Yea, it's a coincidence that you never see a positive Bernie story on the MSM. They routinely ignore him and when they do actually cover him, it's ALWAYS negative. Disgusting. The media has devolved into billionaires paying millionaires to misinform you..

  56. I don’t understand how barr has any authority anymore! How is it he still has so much power! It was proved He broke the law!!! And what are the Democrats waiting for why don’t we get on with it? Certainly they have enough proof to start start impeachment proceedings!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *