—Dean Burgon Society 2019

—Dean Burgon Society 2019



[Applause] [Applause] [Applause] [Applause] [Applause] [Applause] welcome to this afternoon's meeting that's open our services by singing hymn number 370 370 six standing as recently 3 7 3 Oh this afternoon your speaker have the privilege listen to dr. Watson and dr. Kristen Spencer folk this morning to attend to it now we have dr. James Johnson from Texas and he's going to speak on the subject favored over the Hebrew by anti Texas settlers men seclusion is pushed to higher and speak on that subject my little question for the Johnson as you this is this topic is a bit it is a bit surprising to some and I should have grabbed my notes for a hooked up here last night I was trying to make copies at the printer of the handout that you have and one of the folks that I work with came up and asked what was going on and I told him what would I be talking about and he was very surprised that anyone would be promoting the septuagint as and as the teen I first learned of textual criticism the the scam that it is from Chick tracts and at that time most of the attention and still most of the attention is on the New Testament and what the critics have done to try to pollute the text of the Greek but in recent years I've noticed here and there and then here and then they're more people pushing the Septuagint and acting as though we need to take that more seriously than the content in the Masoretic text and it makes you think why why would there be this this trend of of an effort in that direction trying to mess with the scriptures his goal has been to cause Adam and Adams race to doubt God's Word and to be confused about God's Word and that's the way things have been since the Garden of Eden so in that respect it's not really a new trend but you want to spend a whole lot of time studying something really men see just jump into the deep end of what's going on with the septuagint what is it how did it come to be here is what we have today which is called by the name Septuagint the same thing as what other people have meant by that word when they talked about a Greek translation of the Old Testament who did it when was it done what were the motives for changing some of the content in that translation from the real content which is in the Hebrew text that God gave us by inspiration using the profits of his choice as the Apostle Peter tells us in 2nd Peter chapter 1 well time is important to God we see that right off the bat in Genesis chapter 1 he made the Sun and the stars and the moon and said that they were to rule and that they would be helpful in in identifying times and seasons he gave us time to to live in and also he gave us prophetic information that was indexed a time in particular I'm thinking of the Messianic prophecy in the Book of Daniel chapter 9 and although this is not my topic today so far from what I've seen the Septuagint does some little little tricky maneuvers in that they don't want the truth to get out now when you are looking at the first century AD and you have the nation of Israel rejecting Jesus as the real Messiah to the extent that he matches the prophecy in the Book of Daniel then there is a motive there to try to somehow confuse or corrupt the information in the Book of Daniel so that it doesn't look like it matches Jesus so the the unbelieving Jews have a problem with Jesus I went to a Jewish high school for one year many years ago and I recall learning that in the periodic readings through the Old Testament when on Friday evening my classmates would would go to their Jewish services they would skip Psalm 22 and they would skip Isaiah 53 what is that a coincidence no they didn't want their people to realize that that Jesus is the promised Messiah then the next group of unbelievers that be the false church and of course the false church starts in the first century because the new testament epistles deal with fakes in the church and particularly those who rise to leadership and eventually formed denominations either infiltrate denominations or they form denominations who are involved in that and if you were to take a group of religious leaders who want to push particular doctrines that that clash with Scripture one way of furthering that agenda would be to try to persuade the public at large that there are some other books that belong with Scripture and if those other books have the doctrines that that the that that are not in the scripture for things like prayers to the dead good works righteousness purgatory those kind of doctrines if you can find or try to argue that those ideas are found in the Apocrypha and then if you can convince people that the Apocrypha is part of God's Word then you can and that's one of the things that goes on that that's one of the reasons why the Septuagint is has the potential for causing as much trouble as it does because the Septuagint in the forms that we find it today includes the Apocrypha the Apocrypha is written in Greek the the Septuagint is a Greek translation of some underlying Hebrew text but it doesn't completely match the Hebrew text that we have received through God's preservation and his providential transmission to us in in what we call the Masoretic text so why are there differences well one of the major main differences which is the one that affects me and I guess I should say little something about that why would I be talking about this because a lot of the articles I write our biology oriented and in fact I have studied Greek in Hebrew but acts and faxes is the publication that I often write in and what the main topics that often pop up there involve the controversy of biblical creation versus evolution including the various compromises that many folks within the Christian community whether saved or unsaved will make with evolutionary thinking and try to kind of force it into the Bible well one of the things that I've noticed is that the Septuagint adds about another thousand and a half years to the chronologies of the Old Testament and so when you have persons within the creation community who want to add more time to God's Word so that they can sneak in a little evolution we would be trying to sneak in evolution you expect evolution from the atheists who say that the Bible is not trustworthy in matters of the history of the earth but for those who percept profess to be Christians profess to treat the Bible as inherent why would they be involved in some kind of blend of evolutionary thinking with how the Bible says things happened in beginning and from the beginning to the present including this major event called the worldwide flood and there's a reason for why this is popping up the way that it is but because of it you know in the details and I'm not good at remembering details that's why you have the handout but the read that the need for an inflated chronology a distorted chronology not only serves the purposes of unbelieving Jews so that they don't have to recognize Jesus as the Messiah that would be their approach the the other reason for using the Septuagint would be to bring in as if it were part of God's Word doctrines that are not part of God's Word by way of the Apocrypha this is kind of a third use that is being made of the Septuagint which is again in opposition to God's Word and the truth that he gives us through his word and it goes back to something very odd which you would never expect would be a mentioned at a conference like this and that is if you were rook looking at sedimentary rock layers that at some point represent how the worldwide flood happened let's say that you have a layer this is like a stack of pancakes and then another layer and a different kind of rock or sand or mud stone these differ and below that boundary is the end of the flood and above that film boundary would be post flood after the flood and if you had some sedimentation that took place as a result of the Ice Age then that would be in the post flood so one of the phrases that that I will use in in the paper is the flood slash post flood boundary now you think this has nothing to do with textual criticism but we're getting there so if here is the boundary and they're all the rock layers below it or some aspects some some stage of the flood and we know from Genesis 8/3 that that at one point though the water had risen to its highest level and then it started going down it started draining and it drained not in a very peaceful way like this the Hebrew indicates that it was going back and forth back and forth back and forth in fact it was back and forth very violently in fact the whole flood was a very violent punishment for a very violent humanity but during during that time you have eventually what is in there gets squashed down and mud eventually hardens becomes becomes the rock layers okay if an imagine that stack of pancakes here if the boundary between flood and after the flood is very low on that stack of pancakes I will say those animals did not exist before the flood therefore they must have somehow come into being after the flood and one of the arguments being made by someone in fact quite a few someones who claim to be Bible believing creationists is that there were four legged land creatures that went on the ark and when they came off the ark very soon after that their offspring became whales now they won't use the word evolution for that because they're calling themselves creationists it's a really use a different word I call it saltation which just means a big jump but all it is is a big jump in vocabulary it's basically evolution but the reason why that we're seeing this in the churches and in the crew in universities is because they are they are giving lip service to their being a worldwide flood and a book of Genesis that tells us what happened I don't have time to get into motives and who's you know who's the useful idiot and who's the one plotting and that kind of thing I'm just going to avoid all that the fact is if they agree among themselves that this rock layer boundary between flood and after the flood is very low in the pancake stack then they use that as their argument for look at all these particular animal types that we don't see below that boundary we only see them above that boundary which means I guess they didn't exist before the flood so somehow what came off the ark changed radically in to these animals right here I work for the Institute for Creation Research our founder Henry Morris had an explanation for why you see dirt certain types of fossils in certain rock layers and his explanation which many others would agree with and I would too is that in different ecological zones some animals are happy in the desert some animals are happy in the swamp some animals are happy in the mountains and so if you're living at different elevations in different places based on how what ecosystem fits best for you as a particular animal then if the flood is coming in stages as the flood waters are rising and sloshing back and forth whoever lives at the lower elevations they're going to get buried first and then when the sloshy muddy sandy gravelly water comes slapping across the continent and buries the next elevation then the rock layers formed from that it's going to have whatever critters happen to be there as well as of course loose ocean critters and that's why you have dinosaur fossils mixed in with clams you know clams don't climb up mountains they get but they're in the ocean and they can get washed in by a tidal wave okay so the the relevance of the time frames is that those who want to push the idea of this so-called saltation this very speedy evolution that happens after the flood and because they believe in worldwide flood they consider themselves biblical creationists but what they're teaching beyond that nary thinking with some Bible talk these radical transformations to happen in the categories of animals and so those who are pushing this four thousand and a half years to what is in the Hebrew text they look at that and say this would really be helpful for us it might be a good idea to endorse the Septuagint and act like we think that this is the the more reliable deposit of the original information that belonged in the Bible now do you see an obvious problem with that if we don't have the underlying Hebrew text that is represented by the Greek Septuagint text according to them is not the original then that means we don't have the original now if you believe in preservation of the text that won't work I mean that's just one of a thousand problems but I'm just telling you that this is a problem that that you're gonna see more of because there are so many that the as you know from looking at church history anytime you have the truth and then you have false ideas being taught by the world there's always a group of people who want to somehow blend the two together syncretism and so if you have evolutionary ideas that are being taught about how animals got here or what the history have a group who tries to somehow blend the two together even though it's it it's oil and water it really won't it really won't blend okay so one of the things that the paper does is is try to provide lists of sources there's one there's one particular quote that I'd like to read because I think it's it's a good illustration of the attitude that is behind some of this okay on page ten there's mention of of to in in the community of the science community roughly defined that is one's a archaeologists and the other is involved in chemistry Henry B Smith I've cited many of his materials he's really pushing hard to get folks to agree that the Septuagint is more accurate in preserving the chronology data of the Old Testament than the Masoretic text and he is he's a leader an editor at Bible and Spade which for many years was very conservative so I'm very disappointed to see that Bible and Spade is now becoming a vehicle for promoting the Septuagint over the Masoretic text but another another person who's less likely to to have as much influence is this Robert Brown but I read his quote because he's he illustrates part of how this happens he he selects the Septuagint chronology data because he thinks it's a better fit to what he's learned from radiocarbon so when he studies carbon-14 dating and he comes up with what he thinks are the accurate dates of things based on that and he looks at the Masoretic text chronologies which take us back to roughly slightly more than six thousand years from now 66 I'm sorry six thousand years from now six thousand years before present and then he looks to the Septuagint chronology data and it puts us at an earth age of roughly seven and a half thousand years before present and so he looks at that he goes I kind of like the septuagint number studies in radiocarbon okay so here's the quote according to the and I'm going to read the bracketed stuff that I inserted you can see on page ten where I've inserted editorial bracketed words according to the translated text of the Bible that was the universal well I wouldn't say universal but he does standard among Christians and I'm not sure I'd use the word Christians identify everybody he's talking about either for the first six centuries the flood occurred five thousand three hundred before President refers to the years before eighty 1950 the zero reference time for carbon that should say carbon-14 age since the authorized version King James of eighty 1611 Western European Christianity has favored a biblical text that is the Masoretic text the Old Testament according to which the flood may be dated 4472 before present that is before 1950 now watch the attitude here I'm at the top page 11 I press the flood at fifty three fifty before present this preference is based on the evidence that the chronological data in the fifth and eleventh chapter of Genesis as given in the Septuagint an assumption here to the value specified by Moses then are those in the Masoretic text of the ninth century so as the chemist he's saying I think that the actual figures that Moses wrote in whatever was his original Hebrew writing that they are more faithfully transmitted by the Greek translation we call the Septuagint then then they are faithfully transmitted by what we have as our Masoretic text as a set of numbers related to human genealogy those given in the Septuagint are much more reasonable what's your standard for why they're more reason and internally consistent now I'm gonna disagree with him on that and I'll get to that in a minute then those in the Masoretic text the Masoretic text data in genesis are more difficult to fit into a reasonable treatment who's defining what a reasonable treatment is here of historical data ethnographic considerations and now we come to what he's really honing in on or c14 data carbon-14 data there is substantial evidence that a source for the Masoretic text gave numbers in the seventh eleventh chapters of Genesis that had been systematically reduced from the values in the allegedly unpreserved original primary source okay that reminds me of something that's going on in politics right now when you have an argument between those who promote the septuagint superiority or those who text authoritative superiority the the septuagint promoters will say that the mazarites shrunk or reduced the numbers in the chronology chapters of Genesis both the septa trees they were tinkered with the numbers and I thought that he has an accuracy tolerance and that he can calculate ages that go into the thousands of years and he can be accurate to within a hundred years that is the level of confidence he has a radiocarbon okay I don't have that level of confidence in a radiocarbon in fact missions of that is there was a about thirty years ago a graveyard a mass grave yard dug up in the middle of England not on the coast in the middle Repton lot closer in time to us then this figure of four thousand two well into the five figures in thirty that that's mentioned there on page 11 okay so the radiocarbon experts say these skeletons are they died in the 600's or the seven hundreds and and the the the reason for that is that as long as you're breathing and eating especially eating you're taking in radiocarbon and then as soon as you die you stop eating that's the way it works and so so you're no longer taking in carbon-14 you are just losing it as it radioactively decays because it's unstable being a radioactive isotope of carbon well the historians who cared a lot about eyewitness accounts and histories that were undisputed said we never had Vikings in the middle of England until the 860 s so getting close to the 900 mark and when we did it was thousands of them and they were called the great heathen army and and they were noticed by a lot of people and and as a result there are a lot of eyewitness accounts and some undisputed history of this large group of skin and avian Vikings who came down there the skeletons also had things like rings that look like they came from Scandinavia and for me the dead ringer was they had a few coins that weren't minted until the middle of the eight hundreds it's really hard to get them buried with skeletons that died in the 607 hundreds you know unless you've disturbed the gravesite well anyway so for 30 years there was an argument about how old these skeletons were between the historians and the paleo biochemist and then finally somebody who is thinking straight thought through how you get radiocarbon into your body in the first place and realize that all of the assumptions and all of the equations were based on assuming a land-based diet that is a plant-based diet so if you're eating grains reading fruit you're eating nuts you're eating oatmeal if you're eating anything it's that's derived from plants that are grown on land they're pulling in the carbon-14 through photosynthesis it becomes part of the plan if you eat the plant it becomes part of you so for that matter if you eat a sheep where you eat a bovine well they have been eating grass or whatever and so you're getting carbon-14 from them in fact for that matter well anyway but who were these Vikings they eat a lot fish and fish don't have near the carbon-14 that land-based diet does and that's enough to throw off the calculation by centuries so when I die and they dig up my bones later they're gonna count the amount of carbon-14 in my bones there you go well he he died during the Civil War that's because I didn't have that much carbon-14 to start with so that's why there won't be that much left when they measure it they'll make the calculation anyway would you can't even get Viking skeletons right to within 200 years that that's just not a good idea well anyway if it helps you to remember this illustration that that those kind of of standards for judging which is a reliable text of the Old Testament then maybe this Limerick will help you I call it seafood diet skewed carbon-14 dating of Viking bones 300 skeletons were found decaying c14 in the ground but the bone dates were odd due to diets of cod proving who thinks that they're using science to determine which is the reliable chronology data and as a result choosing to respect the septuagint as supposedly more accurate than the Masoretic text okay in the next few pages there is some technical information and it goes back to those rock layers and if you recognize that the rock layer that separates the flood settlement washings and then hardening x' if you recognize that it's a lot higher in the pancake stack none of this becomes a problem especially you recognize that some salvations and that would that make sense of why you have certain animals more represented in some rock layers and others but just to show you the extreme to which some who hold themselves out as biblical creationists who are speaking at colleges who are speaking at churches who are writing text books that are used in Christian universities this is what they're actually thinking all right so this is a quote from Kurt wise actually Whitmore and wise and I'll just let this quote speak for themselves if God endowed an ark kind that is the category of animals that was on the ark with the ability to change via steps of substantially different magnitudes meaning drastically changing from a cow to a whale reproduce with their cousins even though they share a common ancestor I don't know that sounds like Darwin to me but it's just post flood Darwinism might be generated among descendants of a given our kind finally some of the animals and this is a quote on page 13 finally some of the animals which are aquatic or marine today that is they live in the ocean may not have been aquatic at the time of the flood the whales might turn out to be another example and then talking about whales they say vestigial legs and hips in modern whales and I would disagree that that's an accurate representation of some of the body parts of modern whales but they're assuming that these are left over from left over byproducts from evolution just like we were once told our tonsils and our adenoids in the appendix we didn't need them they're leftovers from evolution and anyway this did that's what that when you see that word vestigial that's what that's talking about vestigial legs and hips and modern whales confirmed leg ancestors of the whales he existed only a short time ago speaking so I shouldn't put those words into the mouth of John Whitmore Whitmore has done some stuff has taught at a Baptist Seminary he's taught at Bryan College which is Christian liberal arts school he's taught in several places he's saying that the certain body parts in modern Wales confirm that is in his mind they prove lagged ancestors of Wales existed only a short time ago and of course you know in the two sentences above he says some animals which are aquatic or marine today that is live in the ocean or living to pay might not have been aquatic at the time of the flood so he's got walking whales here it is possible that the purely marine cetacean 'he's said a census term it means whales porpoises dolphins of the present so some of the whales porpoises and dolphins of the present were derived from semi aquatic or even terrestrial that is land-dwelling only ancestors on you see why they would like the Septuagint to give them an extra 1,500 years of wiggle room for some of these drastic changes to happen changes that they won't call evolution because they don't want to be called evolutionists so they'll call it saltation okay the next main point that I would want to make in my remaining three minutes by the way there's a nice chart on page 16 that that visually points out the flood boundary rock layer point okay so I'll make two point conclusion and then I'll give an illustration I'm done on page 18 in some there's now potential for yoking to major errors to miss inform us about the past one is promoting the Septuagint as if it were more reliable than the Masoretic text the Old Testament especially with regard to the passages that talk about time like Genesis 5 and 11 and also the 70 weeks prophecy of Daniel chapter 9 and then the second major error is assuming that the flood post flood boundary geologically speaking is at the cretaceous-tertiary which is now called the Cretaceous I'm drawing a blank on what the next one is the PG boundary rather than at the upper Cenozoic layer and that leads to that puts the ammunition into the hands of those who are pushing evolution it in Christian colleges okay so the last point that I would make is the appendix and that starts on page 24 so the last two pages why would you trust the Septuagint when it can't get Noah's Flood right if you do the math the Septuagint gives you a set of numbers on the life of Methuselah which if you do the math he survives the flood by more than a decade all right what was he doing now Peter says that there are only eight souls who are aboard the ark we know who they are Noah and his wife Shem ham and Japheth and their respective wives okay that makes eight so what was Methuselah doing hanging on the side of the boat with respect to the Septuagint more than the Masoretic text on something as silly as that and remember what is at stake here if the Septuagint really is superior and it represents a Hebrew text that will pass away thank you for your attention all right let me get there some all right I'm almost there my soul faint fainteth for thy salvation but I hope in thy word mine eyes fail for thy word saying when wilt thou comfort me for I am become like a bottle in the smoke yet do I not forget thy statutes how many are the days of thy servant when wilt thou execute judgment on them that persecute me the proud have dig pits for me which are not after thy law all thy Commandments are faithful they persecute me wrongfully help thou me they had almost consumed me upon earth but I forsook not thy precepts quickened me after thy loving-kindness so shall I keep the testimony of thy mouth thank you brother Johnson we appreciate that very much let's turn our hymnals for a song and last time we think we've sang which why do we sing was it faith of our fathers okay okay now he lives page number 68 he lives 60 I know I see I hear and just name Jesus mission oh my me see the Oh he made love recently to give me a copy of their missiles I'm least and losing them buses of for that do it with John Watkins and brother Johnson I need those secured to bring them up so have them for the materials appreciate that our next speaker will be brother James grumbling and he'll speak on the dangers of the esv Bible mill or bless you brother John but and this is the anchor from the city anchor dr. McKay yes sir thank you it's a pleasure to be with all of you today people of this church for the wonderful meals for the facility and the ability to bring us together and give us a place to meet and rejoice in our Lord and our Savior Jesus Christ and I thank you God for the freedom we have in this nation and pray Lord that we don't lose this one have the freedoms that we have but let us not use this freedom and shrink back from proclaiming the good news of the message of Jesus Christ our Lord and our Savior to this world this lost world that we live in I'd like to start today in my message in 1st Corinthians chapter 2 1st Corinthians chapter 2 and I like to read verses 9 through 14 but as it is written eye hath not seen nor ear heard neither have entered into not the mind of man but the heart of man neither have entered into the heart of man the things which God has prepared for them that love him but God hath revealed them unto us by his spirit for the spirit searches all things yea the deep things of God for what man knoweth the things of a man save the spirit of Man which is in him even so the things of God knoweth no man but the Spirit of God now we have received not the spirit of the world but the spirit which is of God that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God which things also we speak in the words which man's wisdom teaches but which the Holy Ghost teaches receiveth not the things of the kingdom of God of the Spirit of God for the arnis unto him neither can he know them why because they are spiritually discerned it takes the spirit of the Living God to open up the Living Word of God and simplify it reduce it down to something the natural man can understand it's impossible it takes the spirit of the Living God so all of these Bible companies that try to promote a newer easier to understand Bible our Foolish they are going cross ways with the Word of God now I'm going to talk today about the ESV Bible it is published by the cross way Bibles cross way now I'm going to assume they meant cross way in a way that is the way of the cross but cross way can also mean going crosswise with something and literally this Bible goes cross ways with the Word of God because I have in our handout today quickly I put together scripture passages that I'm aware of that the ESV violates by either eliminating or changing things there are over a hundred and seventy passages in the handouts I gave to you showing these verses that are contrary to the Word of God in the sense that they've altered them change them deleted them or modified them and that was just a cursory quick look of what I'm there are many many more these are by no means exhaustive of the New Testament changes and these changes are there because they use the corrupt Westcott and Hort text to translate from into this there's an old statement you cannot see the forest for the trees well the ESV is a tree in the forest of all of these corrupt Bibles that are out there today the modern-day versions it's just one tree I'm going to talk about that tree today but the problem is really the forest that forest exists because of two wicked men Westcott and Hort that took an old document the Vaticanus and a corrupt document the sign Atticus and merged them together mainly they use the Vaticanus but where the vana cadence was missing portions they bowed to the son Atticus document and merged them together into a brand-new Greek text that had never existed before its release in the Year 1881 it is not the oldest and the best it is in fact the newest and the worst that's the accurate description of it they even tampered with the Old Testament now the Old Testament the Jews kept very accurate records of the Bible as they knew it at that time very accurate and yet Westcott and Hort in their Greek texts have just done tragedy to the Texas Receptus typed up not the translation of the Greeks the accurate Greek texts that we have today that the King James Bible was translated from it is not a vile document it is the perfect document that we have to work from they chose the Vaticanus which is a document that was corrupted by origin and others that came out of Alexandria Egypt and the dry climate there is why a lot of those corrupt documents made it through time because time ravaging paper and papyrus and vellum it didn't happen back then because of the dry climate so basically we have the Westcott and Hort texts and we're going to go through today what actually happened and what has been done in the esv translation I want to talk initially and I pass documents out to you so you can follow along with me and I'm going to not go through every one because there's over a hundred and seventy of them and we don't have enough time to go through them so I'm going to skip some of them but I want to start on page one the names and titles of Jesus have either been eliminated or altered núñez be the phrase Lord Jesus Christ mission 82 times however in the ESV it is either eliminated or altered 24 of those times that's 29% of the time they've changed it the title Christ is missing 12 times in the following verses now Lord Jesus Christ Lord is a title imparted to Jesus by God he is the Lord Jesus is his name and Christ shows he the Anointed One so those three put together he is the Lord by title his name is Jesus and he's anointed to do the work of God by the father so we see that when the metal whiffle Christ is missing twelve times and I'm not going to go through every verse because they're listed there for you the term Christ is missing numerous times also throughout the esv when used either alone or in conjunction with the name Jesus to many dimension here in this short discourse the same applies to Jesus many times when the title Jesus Christ or Christ Jesus is given one or the other of the either the name of Jesus or the term Christ the Anointed One is missing multiple times too many times to mention here the name Jesus is missing in the title the Lord Jesus Christ the name Jesus is missing one time in Romans 1618 the name or title Jesus Christ is missing two times and I show the two references there and then the title Lord is missing five times in several passages listed there the term Lord is missing numerous times throughout the ESV when used either alone or in conjunction with the name Jesus as the Lord Jesus etc and again too many times to mention in this discourse the entire verse of Romans 1624 is missing and that verses the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all amen they take that whole verse out of their Bible entire phrases containing the words Lord Jesus Christ themas I bow my knees on to the father and they remove the remainder of our Lord Jesus Christ that is missing Colossians 1 to 2 the scenes and faithful brethren in Christ which are in Colossae grace beyond to you and peace from God our Father and then they remove and the Lord Jesus Christ 1st Thessalonians 1 1 Paul and Silvanus and timotheus under the Church of the Thessalonians which is in God the Father and in the Lord Jesus Christ grace be unto you and peace and they stopped because they eliminate from her in the ESV it is either eliminated or altered seven times in example 12 percent of the time the name Jesus is missing four times and I give the verses the title Christ is missing and the phrase in Christ Jesus is missing in Galatians 6:15 for in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything nor uncircumcision but a new creature but they eliminate in Christ Jesus they remove it from their scriptures the term Jesus Christ the name title Jesus Christ appears 107 times in the King James Version of the Bible however in the ESV it is either eliminated or altered 14 of those times at 13% the term title Christ is missing seven times the verses the name Jesus is missing two times and I give the verses for that the entire verse of acts 8:37 is missing because the Ethiopian eunuch said what must I do to be saved and Philip said if thou believest with all thine heart thou mayest and he answered and said I believe that Jesus Christ is the son of God the answer was to the question what does hinder me from being baptized they eliminate the entire phrase this is where we get baptism from this is where we get baptism of people who believe in Jesus but the Roman Catholic Church believed in infant baptism so what do we have here there's a condition for baptism what is the condition scripturally if you you believe in all your heart you may they took it out they eliminated that's one of the standard verses we use to show that you must be a believer before you're baptized you don't get baptized as an infant and become a believer the entire verse of routine 24 is missing the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all amen took the whole verse out entire phrases containing the words Jesus Christ are missing in the following verses Romans 1:3 concerning his son Jesus Christ our Lord which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh Jesus Christ our Lord is missing in their version of the Bible Ephesians 3:9 and to make all men see what is the Fellowship of the mystery which from the beginning of the world have been hid in God who created all things by Jesus Christ by Christ Jesus is missing in their Bible it just leaves a hanging Ephesians 3:14 for this cause I bow my knees under of our Lord Jesus Christ so throughout the remainder of this teaching I want to share different verses of the Bible where they eliminate or remove things and it's important to understand the verses here and that is by far not all those I could remember off the top of my head and checked them out verified it and their version of the Bible to make sure they weren't there and I wasn't misquoting something and I checked they took out and again they alter the wording to get around copyright laws so the wording is altered a little bit the scriptures you see here are the King James Version and I said they took out of their Bible but I want to share something with you just so we understand the King James Bible is copyrighted in England when the copyright laws window into effect the nation's put to journalist of books that they claim they own and guess what the Kings press owned the King James Bible they forgot to put it in their list of books and when the official list came out it slipped through the cracks and only in England is the King James Version of the Bible copyrighted and only the Kings press can print it in England and anyone else they came allows but in the rest of the free floor what are the publishing companies going to do the greedy little buggers they got us come up with a reason why that whole Bible you don't need that you need the latest and the greatest version of the Bible and we have hundres of English translations more coming out every single year that they say you've got to buy the latest one the last one which used to be the best one is no longer the best one even though we printed it we have a newer better more modern edition you need to buy from us guilty of filthy lucre publishing the Word of God and selling it for profit let's start looking at some of these changes that they made every word every word in there is important God doesn't mess around if he says that he meant it and let me share something with you in the end it's gonna be God's Way or it's gonna be God's Way but it's gonna be God's Way there's no changing it when Jesus said verily verily or truly truly they took ii verily in a second truly out they said we don't need to duplicate that well one of the things we realize in the Bible that in the written word we miss and that's inflection inflection I don't believe Jesus said truly truly I believe Jesus said truly truly he's making a point of it verily verily I say unto you who the true making it a point driving at home putting inference to it so Jesus in Matthew 1:25 and knew her not talking about Joseph knew her not that's Mary till she brought forth her firstborn son now we all know Mary had other children through Joseph scripture proves that beyond any shadow of a doubt but liqu teaching that she was always a virgin she would never defile herself to have sex with a man she's the ever Virgin Mary so they have to keep her ever virgin she could not have had any other children yes the first one came supernaturally but there couldn't have been any others she's the Virgin Mary no the Bible says that's her firstborn meaning there was a second born and a third born there was others they took the word firstborn out where is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger yet cetera they took out without a cause meaning you can never ever ever be angry there was a time to be angry I get angry with a pedophile I get angry where the murderer there's a time to be angry Jesus was angry in the temple when he saw the money changers did he sin no he didn't but he stood there making plating a whip of course knowing exactly what he was going to do oh there's premeditated anger no he is the son of God he had a right to cleanse the temple and B did cleanse the temple and he was angry when he did it and he had a right to be so he had a cause but they took out without a cause Matthew 5:27 he have heard that was said by them of old time they removed of old time they're trying to eliminate any attachment between the New Testament and the Old Testament let me share something you there's a page in the Bible that's corrupt even the King James Bible and that's the page that separates the old and the New Testament it doesn't belong there it's one book it's one book there is no separation and that separator page look it's one God it's one word and we got to get an opinion that we need the entire council oh the Word of God you can go into bookstore and buy a new Testament I want arms of travers in it because you need those but you don't need the rest of it no we need the whole counsel of God's Word from Genesis through revelation every bit of it and it's one book Matthew 5:4 to you love your enemies bless them that curse you do good to them that hate you and pray for them which despitefully use you and persecute you they took half of that verse out they remove them and lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil and they stopped the Lord's Prayer but the prayer went on for thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever amen they removed that last portion Matthew nine thirteen but go ye and learn what they're moving to repentance making easy believe ISM you don't have to repent of your sins you don't have to recognize you're a sinner you just need to come to Jesus there's no repentance there's no judgment of God impending if you don't they took to repentance Oh Matthew 17:21 howbeit this kind goes not out but by prayer and fasting same thing with Matthew 18:11 for the Son of man has come to save that which was lost both of those verses have been removed from their Bible their version Matthew 19:17 and he said unto him why callest thou me good there is none good but one that is God but if thou will enter into life keep the commandments they removed why call us though me good and they also removed the portion where it says there is none good but one they removed that as God's sewing that God is the only good one I got in the habit I tried to catch myself people say how you doing today I say I'm doing good no I'm not good and me do all of no good thing Matthew 22:30 for in the record resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage talking of the Angels but are as the angels of God in heaven they removed out of God they just say the angels in heaven while there are other eight but be not called rabbi for one is your master and then they show who that master is even Christ and all ye are brethren they took out even Christ which is who the master is now as I was progressing in this I'm realizing something one of the worst modern-day translations is the NIV the New International Version also means nothing no information of value NIV but I'll share something with you I was shocked when I started realizing that the ESV closely follows the NIV I didn't know that until I was putting all these notes together I can't tell you how many times the NIV and the ESV setting side-by-side are saying the same thing it's just as corrupt as the NIV it is no better Matthew 2314 the entire verse is removed woe unto you scribes and Pharisees hypocrites for you devour widows houses and for a pretence make long prayer therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation that entire verse is gone Matthew 25:31 when the Son of man shall come in his glory and all the holy angels with him they took the word holy out and just have all the angels Matthew 26:28 for this is my blood of the New Testament they took out the word new it is my blood of the Testament Matthew 27 35 and they crucified Him and parted his garments casting Lots that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Prophet they parted my garments among them and upon my vesture did they cast lots they took that entire last portion out it seems they had something against Old Testament prophecy being fulfilled in the New Testament almost every instance of that showing in the Bible they removed the reflection back to the Old Testament time and again I've seen that mark 1:14 now after that John was put in prison Jesus came into Galilee preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God they removed of the kingdom of God gospel means good news well there's lots of good news messages out there but how many pertain to the kingdom of God Jesus preached pertaining to and concerning the kingdom of God they took that out mark 1 31 and he came and took her by the hand that's Peters mother and lifted her up and immediately the fever left her and she ministered unto them they took the word out immediately so they have it saying in the fever left her well over how big of course a time healing is when something occurs over time a miracle is one thing happens immediately and they took out the word immediately therefore removing the miraculous portion of it and making it into a healing portion mark 2:17 again they took out to repentance calling sinners to repentance mark 3:15 and to have power to heal sicknesses and to cast out devils they remove the portion to heal sicknesses mark 611 and whosoever's and whosoever shall not receive you nor hear you when you depart thence shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them verily I say unto you it shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah in the Day of Judgment than for that City they removed that glass portion from verily on any references to Sodom and Gomorrah are removed sodomy parades in the government issues and government laws being passed that are okaying what God says is not okay there are many types of sin in the world but only Sodom and Gomorrah were singled out by God for judgment to rain to bring that type of judgment to see first sin now God or want to just remove all those warnings and any type of history about it in mark 7 16 If any man have ears to hear let him hear they remove that whole verse mark 9:29 and he said unto them about casting out demons this kind can come forth by nothing but by prayer and fasting they took out and fasting now he could not cast out a demon because two things were required they had to be prayed up and they had to be fasting to cast out that tight guess who doesn't want you to know that guess who doesn't want you to know that so they took out what and fasting so you can pray all you want but if you're not fasting that kinds not going out I'm not saying that Jesus said that and it's the devil's that want you to know and not know what you have to do to get out that type of the demon out of a situation mark 9 44 where their worm dieth not and the fire is not quenched that entire verse is eliminated as it is 86 and then in mark better to have the first portion I left out but then having two feet to be cast into the hell into the fire that never shall be quenched that's removed all of the warnings about judgment and eternal judgment are removed from the Bible you know there are those that talk about universal Redemption III don't understand now you can read the Bible and come up with that but they do and they think ultimately in the end everybody's going to be saved hell is going to be emptied even the devil and the fallen angels are ultimately going to be saved because God is love and he's gonna have everybody saved in the end I don't find an script and one of the main reasons that we've got to preach the gospel to the world is this and it's a terrifying thought I tremble when I think of it and enter our gonna be in the lake of fire for eternity it will never stop it will never cease in a googol years from now and Google is the number one by a hundred zeros they won't even have started their punishment now in the billion of these and I'd say well I want to Google well our dad you're kidding there's no such thing I did yeah there's of Google well one day we got in the car were having that little discussion again and I said I want to Google and the other kid says yeah I want to Google and my third son says I want a googolplex and I said no there's no such thing as a googolplex he's yasser is the Googleplex and a googolplex are the Google times of it seems that when God creates a spirit being that spirit being never will cease to exist they might Donal into they to get the message of salvation out mark thirteen fourteen coconut by Daniel the prophet mark sixteen nine to twenty they put a note in there that the oldest manuscripts do not contain these verses that's a flat-out lie if you look at the oldest manuscripts there's space for them in fact I've got sign Atticus it's back there as an example opening open to that page and you can see where there's space for it and even looks like it was there at one time and he raised its fraud I have back there a English hexapla and it's got the Wycliffe Tyndale great Geneva Reims and the 1611 Bible all those early loo Father birth father of Jesus Christ they removed the term Joseph because that's what the Bible calls him Jolson and to put his father in as if he was the birth father and we go on and on with these verses all the way through there and I show all of the places where they removed portions of Scripture removed entire verses and they say this is better than the King James Bible it's not better it's an abomination and we ought not be and we ought not be using it as the Bible it is not the Word of God if a Bible and in fact in his truth he's the epitome of truth and that's a blasphemous attack against his integrity so let's let's close with then father we thank you for your word we thank you Lord that you have preserved your word and it is intact and the work that they've done year after year I thank you for my brother dr. Waite in his faithfulness year after year to bring forth the Word of God tonight as well as the other seekers that come after me for the work of this ministry and Lord we pray that your word go forth and do a mighty work in this nation and in this land and through all that hear our voice over the media presentation that is given forth we thank you for that father in Jesus precious name and we praise you for and I am blessed because I love this song this psalm is about Jesus and end but my favorite portion is the end that I get to preach on today and say starting in psalm 119 verse 89 forever O Lord thy word is settled in heaven thy faithfulness is on to all generations thou has established the earth and it abideth they continue this day according to thine ordinances for all are thy servants unless they law had been my delights I should then have perished in mine affliction I will never forget waited for me to destroy me but I will consider thy testimonies I have seen an end of all perfection for thy but thy commandment is exceeding broad thanks be to God the standard for can we're going to say it in truth [Applause] that speakers brother DL Cooper dr. Cooper is the next speakers are gonna speak on the topic the most important question the right here okay here's the thing looks like we're all raising Cain around here don't ever Cain's I'd like to say thank you to Pastor Marino and the Gatewood Baptist Church we've been treated royally here and what a blessing it is in to us to be able to come and and just fellowship and this brother you'll love him if you haven't met him you be sure you do that and because he he's Sunday and able to speak here and and home Sunday evening and having spoken with you on the phone and just a tremendous brother in the Lord and and we love Him is that all you want me to say brother no seriously I really I really meant that the folks if you don't know me you know that joke actually somewhere along the line so my brother brother Moreno has had to adjust to that and and and he did it quite nobly too as well so I like to say also I thank God for the Dean Berg on society and what they have has helped me over the years and what we've what has been accomplished at the Dean Berg on society and for those who've helped me and taught me over the years and we have to our church and we look forward to next next year and we have so many and to come to Georgia and preach and so we'll try to get him there and try to get him to take part in the service there but he comes ahead of – amen all right we're gonna read if we would reverse the scripture a couple of verses of Scripture from from the Gospel of Matthew if you have a cardioversion and so they're going to try to shock my heart in two back into sinus rhythm and so you pray you pray about that and also I have some time right after that the next week or so I'm going to have a 1 centimeter to one and a half centimeter kidney stone removed – just pray about that if you would I need your prayers for that the most important question I want to read from Matthew chapter 22 he of Christ who's and father we pray yet help us indelibly upon our the tables of our heart or that we can be faithful to you realizing one of these days Lord that you will receive us to glory and we'll be so happy that we stayed by the Word of God both today I pray it blesses reading I pray Lord for this feeble preacher that you'd so fill me with your spirit use these words for your honor for your glory I pray it would take the Blessed promised Holy Ghost us and use us we pray in Jesus name these questions in life and the way that they're answered these questions could be bringing either great joy or great devastation to us either way the answer will bring some life-changing consequences to our lives and the Word of God also has many questions the answer these questions likewise are equally as important I like this today that you don't already know but we will look at this I'm sorry Genesis chapter 3 you shall not eat of every tree of the garden and then of course we know if we know the woman what the woman said but then it would be the data first question is about the Word of God questioning God's Word and then in 1st 9 God said to Adam that he said who who told thee that the house was naked you see Adam had ran in hid he didn't heed that thou it's not eat here again or against the Word of God that I commanded thee mm uh t no well we read that down to chapter 4 and we see in chapter 4 and verse 6 in regard Lord God said unto Cain where am I my brother's keeper and then he said what has – the book of Job if you would you remember in the book of Job there are many many questions as Jobe faced his dilemma many questions when Joel chapter 14 a job is answering so far if you remember and he says but man Daiya 'then wasteth away young men giveth up the ghost and where is he now that's an important question then verse 14 of the same chapter of job 14 if a man die shall he live again that's an important question so we see these questions that seem to build all through the scripture then verse chapter 25 and verse 4 Bildad is talking of course expounding on the I guess if you would the sovereignty of God and he says how then can a man be just with God that's an important question is it or how can a Mack and he be clean that it's born of woman throughout the Word of God there are many many questions but there but a few of these questions that really that we that we can see a conflict is presented and the conflict is designed I believe to draw her when these questions were to draw out an answer he wanted Adam and back in math in in in Matthew chapter 16 Matthew chapter 16 verse 13 and when Jesus came in to whom do men say that I am and they said and they said some say that thou art John the Baptist and some say Elias and others Jeremias or one of the prophets and he said them to them but whom say ye that I am if you'll notice first of all it was an open question it was the question to all do you think Jesus a Living God now you remember that the Commission was coming for them to go out into the world and preach the God do not believe that he's the son of God and how could we have a Bible that was reliable if it didn't book didn't teach us who the Son of God is in verse 16 back in verse 16 Peter a Peter gave that supreme answer and that's what I'm preaching on today is the supreme question or the most important question Peter gave the supreme answer to the supreme question is since since the supposed purpose of this new critical translation of scripture every two to three years is to bring us closer and a closer relationship to Christ how is it that they cannot give us an accurate answer to Matthew chapter 22 and verse 42 what thinking of Christ why can't they give us a clear answer we wonder that don't we should we not expect the translators and the revisionists at least to know and to believe that these Jesus is that would not be just fair enough to ask them should we not expect them to it believe at least believe what Simon Peter and the disciples believed taking the gospel to the world and if you if one is and they'll never touch him again same as the mutilation that we read of in I say of our blessed Savior as if whose son is he at the very root of the plot to do away with the testimony of Christ and to to make him a mere man of course Satan is this Satan of course Satan himself and enlisting those such as Westcott and Hort to call into question whose son is he you see that's the question you go back to Genesis the crux of all the end of the answer to all this depends on whose son is he if he is not Christ if he's not Jesus if he's not God all these other questions don't mean anything I tell the Jehovah's Witnesses when they come to my door and they want to argue about well you that Jesus is God before we can go any further and if you can't agree with that we can't go with me further and so they leave I understand that they're talking to a Baptist preacher but but whose son is he that the Westcott and Hort devising devising they're attending to be Christians they hated God and sought to destroy the truth of God and and corrupt the Christian faith with all the with all the while maintaining their love and connection with a Romina system even though remaining in the Church of England they kept their allegiance to Rome and the worship of Mary expecting world of faulty faith and the basic view wanted to quickly and is far away they wanted as quickly and as far away as they could Bible and they wanted secondly to attack the person and work of Christ on the cross then I wanted to open the door of ecumenism and endure the hearts of the people to a corrupt theological system of works you're saved by grace saved by grace not works it was in 1881 that a devilish strategy of textual criticism of Westcott more that it had known for more than 1500 years in altering or rejecting completely the Texas receptors in we attack the deity of Christ the eternal sea of and sonship of Christ his virgin birth his sensitive us of better texts all the while destroyed the Word of God and corrupting the faith and presenting a gospel of works the gospel that's not a good series he and using the corrupted text of the Vaticanus in the semi Erica's went on Westcott and Hort began to systematically tear down the fundamental foundation for foundational doctrines of the preserved Word of God producing a new testament designed to promote the tenets of Romanism and doomed souls to hell for the salvation doctrine of works these places that we don't have time to go too far too many to answer in this short period of time but Jesus really balls balls all the pertinent questions of the world forty-two what think you've Christ whose son is he after been confused by Jesus answers to the three questions that the Pharisees had already asked that were designed to trap and condemn him in verse in Matthew chapter 22 verse 15 to 40 Jesus now asked them the supreme question what think ye of Christ whose son is he like that's you that question what think ye of Christ who sent us say the subject of Jesus question had to do with the Messiah now the work Christ meant Messiah did not call of course Jesus didn't get I call him Christ so when Jesus asked this question the Pharisees did not understand that it was a question about the personal identity of Jesus but a son of David Matthew 22 42 this is reduce a correct answer and if they had if they had checked the genealogy that they've gone to ancestry.com they who is surely if he's our Lord in verse 50 15 to 22 of this chapter Matthew you'll be a good citizen if he is your Lord in verse 22 23 to 33 you will not worry about the hereafter the future if he's your Lord you will love God and your neighbor I don't know what y'all believe I hope you believe this but I still believe in the lordship of Christ I believe he's my Lord and I believe he was my lord from the time of the moment I would say and now this question the question that we have here has eternal consequences and it demands the correct answer the supreme question is the question that I would like to ask Westcott and Hort and and all the other version the only proponents and other only version proposed they they want any other version for the King James and in asking this question we could only allow them to answer please don't get up and leave I did some messages about Billy Graham and I said I don't know what Billy Graham said I didn't hear him but I'm gonna read you his words and we're gonna let you know if what he said not me but what he said and so we we're going to just see what these men said these men here or those that are corrupted that try to give us a better scripture a better text first of all I'd say to these translators what think he of his deity and virgin birth we can only look at at the various texts produced by these Bible critics to get their answer now that our King James Bible says in protecting me John chapter 6 verse 29 and we believe and are sure that thou art that our Christ the Son of the Living God and so what think he vowel translator of his virgin birth you just told us 1st Timothy chapter 3 we know it well verse 16 says and without controversy great is the mystery of godliness God was manifest in the flesh justified in the spirit seen of angels preached among the unto the Gentiles and bleed on in the world and received up into glory new American Standard says by common confession great is the mystery of godliness he who was revealed in flesh was vindicated by the spirit seen to be seen by angels proclaimed among the nations believed all in the world and taken up to glory taken up in glory the not inspired version says this Bearden was vindicated by the spirit and was seen by angels and that was preached among the nations was believed on in the world and was taken up in glory and the TeV goes on to say no one can deny how great is to seek of our religion he appeared in human form wasn't was shown to be right by the spirit and was seen by angels and he was preached among the Gentile to heaven following the lead of the revisionist in the critical text they tell tell us their answer to the supreme question whose son is he what thank you of Christ who sent a seed that's they're telling us what they believe then what mr. Westcott mr. for Bible Translators and revisionist oh the corrupted text of the TV Denny being the NIV and others to raise their hand from the back up from the back row the revisionist classroom parroting the corrupted text God and the eternal existence of Christ notice what Micah says Micah 5:2 says but thou Bethlehem and then the TeV says the Lord says Bethlehem Ephrata you are one of the smallest towns of Judah but out of you I will bring a ruler of Israel whose family lying goes back to ancient times and then the ESV that our brother spoke off simply says who's coming forth is from of old from ancient days but then in first in the Gospel of John 1 verse 14 and the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld brass up you became flesh and made his dwelling among us we have seen his glory the glory of one of the one and only who came from the father full of grace and truth the TeV says the word became the human being and full of grace and truth lived among us we saw his glory the glory which he received as the father's only Son the corrupted text completely does away with our Lord's eternal pre-existence and making him just your man just a man revisionists Bible Translators what thinking of Christ who son is he waiters are following Westcott and Hort tactics and they attacked the blood of Christ altering the text to read death or sacrifice instead of blood I heard probably the most famous radio preacher of our day now I heard him say that it's the death of Christ that I'm in love with not the blood of Christ he said if you had been there at the cross that day and one drop of what is anybody crazy enough to believe that that would have ever happened but aren't these verdes translations stated a translator Paul said foreign cautions 114 in whom we have redemption through his blood even the forgiveness of sins but then the ESV is our brother mentioned says in whom we have Redemption the forgiveness of sins the blood the NIV in whom we have Redemption the forgiveness where's the blood and the Tina the TV says in whom we are set free that is of our sins that is our sins are forgiven they leave out the blood the blood out the Bible tells us our Bible tells us in first first Peter 1:18 you know it well for as much as you know that you're not redeemed with corruptible things such as silver and gold from your vain conversation received by tradition of your father's but with the precious blood of Christ as of a lamb without blemish and without spot now what does the TV say it says for you know what was paid to set you free from the worthless manner of life handed down by your ancestors it was not something that can be destroyed such as silver or gold and then verse 19 he says that it was the costly sacrifice of Christ who was like a lamb preachers say that he very well could have just been strangled as he was crucified if I read my Old Testament correctly I believe that a strangled sacrifice was not acceptable is that right even these sort of these are just a few of the instances of the miss translating and manipulating of the text and corrupting thus saith the Lord there are numerous playful which is not another completely destroy the doctrine of redemption through the blood of Christ as we read we read that we can read in the critical text versions what the translators and revisionists really believed about the blood of Christ they do away with it completely the first Peter chapter 1 will read those verses again first Peter chapter 1 verse 19 verse verse 18 and 19 for as much as you know that you were not redeemed with corruptible things as silver and gold from your vain conversation received by the tradition of your father's but with the precious blood of Christ precious blood of Christ as of this lamb without blemish and without spot they say to you this blood is precious the precious blood of Christ bloodless precious and let me say according to this passage I believe that it it was Presley since it's precious first of all because it redeems from the corruption of religion secondly it's precious because it releases from the captivity of tradition converted Catholics in here today I know one and you were you were marked by tradition you were haughty as the plan of Christ for salvation what can wash away my sins nothing but the blood of Jesus what can make me whole again nothing but the blood of Jesus then fourthly what think ye of His Word we know the scripture in our King James Bible 2nd Timothy 3:16 all spaciousness the American Standard Version says every scripture inspired of God is profitable for teaching for reproof for correction for instruction right every scripture inspired of God know where some of it may not be inspired totally according to them the deceptive paraphrasing and dynamic equivalent renderings of the Westcott and Hort and the United Bible Society and the text altering versions tell us plainly what they think of the preserved Word of God they tell us and yet people are still buying them they're giving us the text that doesn't have a Christ doesn't have the salvation by the blood doesn't have a resurrection and people are still buying them as silver tried in the furnace of Earth purified seven times thou shalt keep them O Lord thou shalt preserve them from this generation forever O Lord before I got it it was settled in heaven Psalm 105 and verse eight says he hath redeemed his he has remembered his covenant forever the word which he commanded to a thousand generation I usually give back time so I'm running over time this time so in conclusion it's giving us first to human eyes born verse 29 well she ran away and she said come see come see a man which told me all things ever I did is not this the Christ I would say to you we see in creation as this the Christ we see him upon Calvary's tree is not this the Christ we see a risen Savior is not this the Christ we read of his decision is not this the Christ the one that called me from out of this world is not this the Christ with the one that saved my wretched soul is not this the Christ if you're a child of weakness washing pray finding me then all in all Jesus spent it all and all this the Christ that's the question Amen father we thank you for the good word of God I pray father that you take these fleeting remarks from these feeble lips and multiply into our hearts give us grace to stand for the word of God help us to serve him to live for you and glorify you and all that we do in Jesus name Amen amen would you stand with me please and I believe we're going to read we're going to read psalm 119 97 okay oh how I love thy law it is my meditation all the day though through my Commandments thou through thy Commandments has made me wiser than mine enemies for they are ever with me I have more understanding than all my teachers for that testimonies or my meditation I understand more than the ancients because I keep my precepts I have refrained refrained my feet from every from every evil way that I might keep thy word I have not departed from thy judgments for thou has taught me how sweet are thy words into my taste yay sweeter than honey to my mouth through thy precepts I get understanding therefore I hate every false way they go word be praised believe I used all my time I just take this one thank you brother Cooper appreciate that Minister page one one five weekend is one one five [Applause] we're going to saying that he says during the conference wish we were there however the YouTube keeps going in and out and it all flies only getting part of the message bless you have a servant audio or Bible for them a big Bible for me okay but Bible Ruth is alright and I quote you ought to go to that place for the whores and see if they plan what we're getting hooked up for our next speaker our next speaker is going to be dr. samuel Yoon from South Korea brother before I say that I still need to message this you gave some up if you have any leftover dr. Witt DeWitt and also the John Watkins message for you have that one but Johnson if he has his one and all the other ones so we have my needle through the pulpit so tres cruces dr. salmon you is our next speaker but gets all hooked up here so let me speak on the superiority of the King James Bible in the Old Testament about young to be a be our guest thank you I bring greetings from the Korean churches brother and sister and many of us is praying for us and right now watching the this internet television and today I subject is the superiority of kingdoms Bible in the Old Testament and as you know the all the tests versus issues not texture issue in King James Bible the Hebrew Bible text has been unchanged but the critical appeared to send the comments of the Alexandrian scholars affected at the modern Bible translations there is a leader TR Noah majority main issue not the we just follow the to interpretation but we must always the Hebrew Bible in terms of christological issues and a cusper then this is Jesus did and without Jesus the Hebrew prophets meaning Nessa for us but she just say that him and captive him that's talking about Jesus about Christ so in terms of we must interpret and understand Jesus event the older days versus should be translated with writer theology histology new mythology and Eccleston all ology etc the creator has already a superiority of King James Bible fortunes the translator from original languages tax to Hebrew and Aramaic and the panner translate the leaders right understanding and a translation technique no dynamic equivalent but this is a former and we must ever the textual et cetera and also for superiority sociology the right interpretation and traditional method method take Hebrew text they always use the Hebrew MT Homburg Edition 1925 or so called second revenue Bible the NIV instituted after addition of a biblia hebraica known as in germany pay high as biblia hebraica stitute artesia as well as debris and subsidence in the latin vulgate and death the testicles and that this is all a high as and also 18 city studio Bible and 1947 through 55 55 des is karoku none what is the superior translation technique of a king of the Bible they use a verbal equivalence and the use of former equivalents but rejected dynamic in Bergen the scholar say that he's a lower partition but this is a superior King of the Bible is God's Word is intact in English and the Imperial translation technique of a modern purges they reject further reject former but they accept dynamic Akata free translation not exact meaning of each word patria free translation is the three things that I as a textual critisism the oldest is the better is known the shoulder is better no modern scholar is a better than all the one this theory yes by the liberal theologian and this wrong interpretation but they already say that oldest better so they forged three sometimes a 375 they have any Sinaiticus and particles Tessa very oldest know all this not better always the right thing right is and the shoulder is better not it doesn't matter shoulder and the longer issue but we have a right or wrong issue and also modern scholarship they are or pay stop and according to that weight they were starting DD DD s problems all the DB and we have a tooth trend about the Bible one is a race and religion school and the other one until and healthy and there any other scores the Alexandrian school they have their own seminary professional former scholars and they were writing sir and they well-organized until now but in the anak side they have a no former same and this Alexandria they have a great sin terrible texture corruption and grievous avi Eusebius of Caesarea in the Jerome and the rest of the Augustine of Hippo and Sharma new is all belong so I have fruit of Alexandria cider they say they all believe there are even among the numerous on nobody superior rena of the texture for domestic purposes according to her knowledge of documents or should precede the final judgments upon readings ridiculous and then two manuscripts were favored by western and the court the vatican is oh and a cynical sir they also believe that that combination about codex of bizarre with the older latin and all the syria represented the original from open new testament so texture especially when it's the shorter than other forms of text such as the majority of present in texture type so 90 more than ninety 90.5% belong to present in the majority text only only 45 event scripts among the five thousand seven hundred manuscripts belong to the majority minority minority texture they use the west end of heart cause particles in the cinah cosas as one of the primary principles over their fledgling need a textual criticism was a Alexio preview sometimes taken to extremes such as the theory of a western nun interpolations which has been rejected but and also Westcott and Hort 1881 the flip shaft and warfield Hadji they followed at this line the Keitel the first and the second edition is okay but third thing 1937 we called a Nazi Bible there's comments and critical operatives so much liberal things for freedom for to murder just as you should smash it the brains of the better snake this is a justification for the basta anti-jewish Act this is a keyholder TTL 1943 at that time the Nazi regime in Rudolf oukitel he decided Jews tonight the salvation is a through Jesus Christ United the atonement of Jesus blood of Jesus and rejected the inspiration of a scripture and the contradicted are the words of Jesus like oh Jesus Seminar katha theologian our theological position is put all these abused views into writing so as to be sure and deliver a written record over his personal hostility also do Testaments a theologian through both our apostolate was tried for Nazi war crimes both worked for the German Bible Society which is well known these days Asia you as you UPS the United Bible Society and you had a detail Lexy called for of a biblical languages and open anti-semitic cemetery diversity over time again he published scientific studies depicting the Jewish people as the historical enemy of a Germany Christianity and the European culture in general subsidence we have many problems we holder already this afternoon subdued injure when you with the subsidence much much is different that means our opposites they never caught it from security their own critter books and the disappearance Ptolemy's hotel city of Alexandria and the Pharos lighthouse in the city invisible Alexandria this is Alexandria is the hair color of the nastiest a twisted philadelphus translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into brick she spent about four years at the pattern hem to translate from the Hebrew Bible into Latin third Latin Bible translation per gate became official Bible of Roman Catholic the Roman Catholic they twisted the world of Akkad and also follow this tradition modern Gnostic translations these are or abrogation of a corrupt and the first translations of the Bible they all come from the same polluted the source some a little more warming than others and that there is only difference little divide the Virgin this standard for provide a virgin the work of infidels Westcott and Hort published in 1885 they – it's the Greek translation – Crito Bible 1881 and then four years later divided a version sometimes called divide the English Bible all following translations virgin published by the American committee in 1901 based on oh I've been 63 countries in the world and I heard what you are original visionary prote they all say the King James Bible okay which book is the best seller in the world forever all say that English Bible no no what kind of English Bible all they say the King James Bible that's because all the world countries first American or English or any other the mission is April to King James Bible or filtered upon the tradition past Acela and the second translated second book is not comparable with the King James Bible so it's a no argument about that even America send Bible they published 1901 and after that maybe 10 years maybe 20 years that translation is a little popular in this country Revised Standard origin 1952 only this is a two-ring Korean War Korean War is 1950 through 53 faithful to the best of cricket extra the Old Testaments often depart from the Hebrew for readings in Greek Latin Syrian Aramaic or the one of the translate committee in RSV is attracted by most conservatives especially independent baptist and a fundamentalist and strangely that they should object since it is a blood a plop rather to their beloved a sv so this same tradition how about a new American Standard Bible nineteen seventy one fifty eight scholars they did this one critics argue it is too literal an update in 1995 how about t lb the Living Bible published in 1971 free translations so much is Triplett and conduce translation as 1976 it is they said that decimals 1966 and 1976 whole Bible published his results by UBS and that this could use the Bible also free translation by American Bible Society do international for John 1978 Perry do these translations scholar 15 scholars with terms of around 100 at the time I was teaching at the seminary in Korea and I heard that do international version is translates a potato westminster scholarship there was a light and then later on I heard this among City scholars two of them is a homosexual scallops and 2:18 idea any existence of God and more than four they are any liberal theology the never Westminster scholar they used a modern each to read English an energy inclusive energy anyway is little different from any other other secret RS with terrible and I was among the worst probably was then the RSV we tried to avoid making a mechanical order of reward rendition which is the tendency of many we say the same things today some trans idea

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *