Big Tech, Voter Manipulation and Political Bias

Big Tech, Voter Manipulation and Political Bias

about 138 million people voted in the 2016 US presidential election as we know Trump became president by winning more electoral college votes than Hillary he got 340 votes to Hillary Clinton's 227 Hillary won the popular vote by the biggest margin for a losing candidate she received 2.8 million more votes than Trump keep all these numbers in mind as we discuss today's topic the power of big tech to manipulate public perception and potentially influence election outcomes this article is from Breitbart research Google search bias flipped seats for Democrats in midterms new research from psychologists and search engine expert dr. Robert Epstein shows that biased google searches had a measurable impact on the 2018 midterm elections pushing tens of thousands of votes towards the Democratic candidates in three key congressional races and potentially millions more in races across the country Epstein is an American psychologist author and journalist there was a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing recently in which Ted Cruz interviewed dr. Epstein about Google's bias in search results which could manipulate voters I'll include a link to the full video from Ted Cruz's own YouTube channel in the description box below Ted Cruz says your testimony is that Google is through bias in search results manipulating voters in a way they're not aware of Epstein who supported Hillary Clinton in the last election replies by saying on a massive scale and what I'm saying is that I believe in democracy I believe in the free and fair election more than I have any kind of allegiance to a candidate or party he also said in 2020 all these companies are supporting the same candidate there are 15 million votes on the line that can be shifted without people's knowledge and without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace as we know just like most of the leftist mainstream media big tech also bet the farm on Hillary winning as Cruz pointed out when he questioned Google UX director Maggie stanphill recently Google employees donated 1.3 1 5 million dollars to the Clinton campaign in 2016 and unsurprisingly zero dollars to the Trump campaign and of course who could forget that leaked Google townhall video that Breitbart published where top executives were very upset following the election result in 2016 Sergey Brin found the election deeply offensive and he remarked how it conflicts with many of their values as an immigrant and a refugee I certainly find the selection deeply offensive and I know many of you do too and and I think it's a very stressful time and it conflicts with many of our values as I mentioned in my video big tech must be broken up it was clear from that town-hall meeting that Google is a political actor with an agenda and that they intend to use their technologies to achieve their goals Robert Epstein goes on to talk about not just Google but Facebook he said if on Election Day 2016 if Mark Zuckerberg for example had chosen to send out a go vote reminder say to just Democrats no one would have known if he had done this that would have given that day an additional at least four hundred and fifty thousand votes to Democrats and we know this without doubt because of Facebook's own published data because they did an experiment that they didn't tell anyone about during the 2010 election they published it in 2012 and they had 60 million Facebook users involved they sent out a go vote reminder and they got something like three hundred and sixty thousand more people to get off their sofas and go vote who otherwise would have stayed home the point is I don't think mr. Zuckerberg sent out that reminder in 2016 I think he was overconfident I think Google was overconfident all these companies were I don't think he sent that out without monitoring systems in place we'll never know what these companies are doing but the point is in 2018 I'm sure they were more aggressive we have lots of data to support that and in 2020 you can bet that all of these companies are going to go all out and the methods that they're using are invisible they're subliminal they're more powerful than most any effects I've seen in the behavioral sciences and I've been in the behavioral sciences for almost 40 years Cruz goes on to say the number one fine Oh supporter of the Hillary Clinton campaign in the 2016 election was the parent company of Google alphabet who was our first witness they were her number one financial donor and your testimony is through their deceptive search methods they moved 2.6 million votes in her direction Epstein goes on to clarify that the 2.6 million is a rock-bottom minimum the range is between two point six and ten point four million depending on how aggressively they used the techniques that I've been studying now for six and a half years in related news Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard is suing Google for suspending her Google ad account without explanation this is from Tulsi 2020 calm on June twenty eighth twenty nineteen in the immediate hours following the first Democratic presidential debate millions of Americans were searching online for information about Tulsi Gabbard in fact according to multiple news reports Tulsi was the most searched candidate on Google then without any explanation Google suspended Tulsa's google ads account for hours tolls his campaign advertising account remained offline while Americans everywhere were searching for information about her during this time Google ops Phuket and assembled with a series of inconsistent and incoherent reasons for its actions in the end Google never explained to us why tolls his account was suspended yeah that pretty much sounds like Google if I'm honest zero transparency my second YouTube channel is still sitting on a bogus Community Guidelines warning a week after I appealed it Google controls 88 percent of all internet search in the United States essentially giving us control over our access to information that's one reason why Tulsi has been a vocal proponent of breaking up the tech monopolies and no matter what the motivation was for doing so Google's arbitrary and capricious decision to suspend Tull seized Google ads account during a critical moment in our campaign should be of concern to all political candidates and in fact all Americans because if Google can do this to Tulsi a combat veteran and four-term congresswoman who is running for the nation's highest office Google can do this to any candidate from any party running for any office in the United States Big Tex dominance represents a clear and present danger to our democracy that's why Tulsi is fighting back and has filed a lawsuit against Google in federal court by now you're probably aware of the ridiculous autocomplete results you get when you type men can into Google apparently men can have periods and they can also have babies now it seems Google is programming biases into their algorithms that conflict with actual reality in order to push their agenda in one of the leaked google documents published by project Veritas about algorithmic unfairness it says if a representation is factually accurate can it still be algorithmic on fairness yes for example imagine that a Google image search query for CEOs shows predominantly men even if it were a factually accurate representation of the world it would be algorithmic unfairness because it would reinforce a stereotype about the role of women in leadership positions however factual accuracy may affect product policies position on where or how it should be addressed in some cases it may be appropriate to take no action if the system accurately effects current reality while in other cases it may be desirable to consider how we might help society reach a more fair and equitable state via either product intervention or broader corporate social responsibility efforts if the behavior is unfair it meets the definition regardless of root cause can you believe what I just read in other words if certain search results which happen to be factual are offensive to Google's worldview then perhaps in the interests of helping society reach what Google believes to be a more fair and equitable state equity outcomes basically then the search results could be altered so the truth doesn't matter let's not bother addressing the obvious brain sex differences between the sexes that explain why men and women make different career choices and why men are more likely to strive to be in positions of authority and leadership I guess those factual explanations are just reinforcing stereotypes or something Google a company that believes in feminist affirmative action hiring policies also wants to try to nudge society in a particular direction in order to achieve its political agendas there's zero neutrality here they're literally saying that they're willing to manipulate search results in order to give the user the impression that the world is something other than what it is Google is an information gatekeeper it's disturbing that this search engine is ubiquitous in our lives and yes it has the power to potentially influence elections and push absurd agendas that have no basis in truth you

20 thoughts on “Big Tech, Voter Manipulation and Political Bias

  1. Funny thing happened….. Youtube wanted to know if I thought this video was "calming" amumgst other things….. Well, in law, the presence of one, means the absence of the other, and thus, if you dont tick the "calming" box, their assumption is that you thought the opposite!……. They'd also un-clicked my notification bell!……..

    So what they cam say is, we are just acting in the interests of the viewer, and the vast majority of the users are stressed ny this video, so thats why we blocked it, not because we're 'politically active'

    An just like facefuck, we're not acting as publishers?……

    Ye…. FFFFFFFUCK-OFF…… with ya shit!

  2. Hello Dave
    I am a big fan of you and have been following your channel for a few years .
    I cam across this German YouTuber who has had the same problems with this social platforms as you and many many others . he has decided to fight back against Youtube with success and this is how he is doing it
    Please watch his video you will find it very interesting

  3. The Dems and the Reps BOTH want to start shit with Iran. It doesn't matter who's in the White House now or in 2020.

  4. I find far too much in the way of Google apologetics here. Google's heads have shown us what they really think. Whether the algorithms in place achieve their desired outcome in a first or second cut is irrelevant. The company philosophy is going to influence every single choice made at every single juncture towards outcomes that favour their underlying world views. Every refinement made will be towards their total wokeness and there is no denying that it is their desired outcome to influence the entire world towards that same woke world view regardless of how disconnected from reality it actually is. Google, as a corporation, is thoroughly evil and psychotic. It MUST DIE for the good of humanity!

  5. The really scary thing is that so many of these apparent human beings, actually believe that their actions are devoted to the betterment of humanity rather then the virtual eradication of same, and absolute enslavement of the few which survive the inevitable holocaust. 1984 and Animal Farm, were hopefully warnings about the future, not neo-liberal playbooks. The internet may be a very powerful sword, but it is clearly one which cuts both ways. Be assured that so far most of its various slicing and dicing has worked to the detriment of our collective owners, and I believe they they now know this. However try as they undoubtedly will, the cats are out of the bag, and it will take one hell of an act of herding to get them all safely back into it. The inevitable reaction is finally on its way, and its numbers are region.

  6. hey dave, big fan of your work, very level headed, unlike Gemma O'Doherty, here's a little expose of what she really is-

  7. Here in Texas during the 2018 midterms you could only get Beto to come up in Google searches, you couldn't see Ted Cruz. I took screenshots i was so PO'd. How is this NOT election meddling? They also were busing "latinos" to vote in Texas as well. I can only imagine what would be told to the people on those buses.

    | Published on Jul 28, 2019
    Try the Brave browser – It's more than 2X FASTER than Chrome or Safari, FREE AND PRIVATE! (Make sure you INSTALL it after downloading it)

    Please consider supporting SGT Report on Patron with a monthly contribution:

    The clock is ticking on geoengineering, Jeffrey Epstein and his child trafficking friends & YouTube's fascist censorship of free speech.

    Referenced news:

    Is Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch Insulated?…


    Attention YouTube: The Clock is ticking!…

    For REAL news 24/7:


    Epidemic Sound: "Carnivores Align" and "No Go Zone" paid license for You Tube use

    Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

    The content in my videos and on the SGTbull07 – channel are provided for informational purposes only. Use the information found in these videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence BEFORE making any significant investing decisions. SGTbull07 – assumes all information to be truthful and reliable; however, I cannot and do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this information. Thank you!


    News & Politics

  9. Dave it has been well established that upward of 3.6 million illegal votes were cast for Hitllery. So, no she didn't win the popular vote either. Just like the last elections we saw blatant voter fraud and voter the by the Demonazi. So, no, they are criminals….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *