America's Foreign Policy of Deception (Lies, Omissions, and Criminality)

America's Foreign Policy of Deception (Lies, Omissions, and Criminality)



welcome to Keith's night don't tread on anyone this is America's foreign policy of deception in 1847 we have our first claim without evidence made by a president of the United States James Polk in which Abraham Lincoln said what evidence do you have for this claim the claim made by President Polk was Mexico had invaded our territory and shed American blood upon American soil this resulted in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848 in the United States territorial expansion into what became New Mexico Arizona California Nevada Utah and parts of Colorado and Wyoming in 1860 we had the beginning of the Civil War this was a map showing that in the Union States you had four states which practice slavery this will these states were Kentucky Missouri Maryland and Delaware had Lincoln really been opposed to slavery he would have also outlawed slavery there however the Emancipation Proclamation freed only southern slaves land which he did not have recognized control over after the secession now a divide-and-conquer strategy is to make slavery of white versus black issue however the night the 1830 u.s. census showed there were 407 black slave owners in Charleston South Carolina alone and between 28 and 42 percent of free blacks owned slaves also it counts as slavery if the forced labor is done by the government under the guise of a draft in 1861 James Buchanan implements the Morrill tariff way for the governments to collect monies based on people's productive exchanges and Abraham Lincoln mentions this in his first inaugural address saying the power confided to me will be used to hold occupy and possess the property in places belonging to the government and to collect the duties in posts but beyond what may be necessary for these objects there will be no invasion no using a force against or among the people anywhere another pay up and obey or force will be used in his debate with Steven a Douglas August 21st 1858 he said I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races there is a physical difference between the two which in my judgment will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality and in as much as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference I as well as Judge Douglas and in favor to the race to which I belong having the superior position Lincoln also opposed intermarriage this I guess could be a personal choice however he believed in clear inequality saying blacks should not be allowed to vote or serve on juries in 1862 Lincoln wrote a letter to the founder of the New York Tribune a man named Horace Greeley in the letter he says my paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union and it is not either to save or to destroy slavery if I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that what I do about slavery and the colored race I do because I believe it helps to save the Union link in practice a little slavery himself in 1863 with the enrollment Act enslaving all males ages 17 to 50 to fight in this war to save the Union resulting in six hundred and twenty thousand deaths the British could we guess we could have taken a note from him had the slavery abolition Act of 1833 heroically led by a man named William Weber force it's pretty much only the United States and Haiti who needed quote needed a war to end slavery in 1898 the sinking of the USS Maine at Havana Harbor took place in which five investigations resulted the 1898 Sampson Board the 1911 court inquiry the 1960 76 rickover report the 1999 National Geographic investigation and the 2002 Discovery Channel investigation what they all have in common none of them were able to conclusively determine the Spanish were behind the sinking there's a great deal of research to be done in all five of those that is for a different time this remember the main propaganda was promoted by the William Hearst publishing company the Philippine War of Independence took place in 1899 to 1902 notice the US was not ever attacked by the Philippines however a war did occur in which 200,000 deaths resulted this was the struggle of the first Philippine Republic against the United States annexation of the islands the war was a continuation of the Philippine struggle for independence following the Philippine revolution led by emilio aguinaldo and the spanish-american war 200,000 deaths hardly ever even gets a mention moving on to the first world war this is an ad taken out by the German government in American newspapers hoping to not put any Americans lives at risk knowing it could result in America entering the war on behalf of Britain this would take away all of Germany's negotiation power as it ended up doing in the Treaty of Versailles the Lusitania was sunk on may 7th of 1915 killing many but of the Americans killed there were 128 saying there were no munitions on board for quite some time in fact up until 1982 the London National Archives kept secret documents that eventually showed there were munitions and it was not just a civilian now after the sinking in 1915 nothing really happens Woodrow Wilson runs again and a year later on the platform of he has kept us out of war as Washington warned us about fighting in European Wars Wilson is re-elected in 1916 yet has a sudden change of heart April 2nd 1917 when he says we must make the world safe for democracy in his world safe for democracy speech four days later April 6th 1917 the u.s. enters the war a book published by Yale University in 1924 titled the intimate papers of Colonel house Colonel house not a colonel this was someone who would row Wilson referred to as his second personality and on page 432 of these papers it states on the morning of May 7th house in gray drove out to Q we spoke of the probability of an ocean liner being sunk recorded house and I told him if this were done a flame of indignation would sweep across America which would find itself probably which would in itself probably carry us into war he said suppose they should sink the Lusitania with American passengers on board this was the morning of May 7th later that day May 7th the exact ship the Lusitania sinks a book titled room 40 British naval intelligence 1914 to 1918 written by the cousin of Neville Chamberlain the naval historian Patrick Beasley states nothing absolutely nothing was done to ensure the liner's safe arrival Beasley notes on the basis of evidence available to him by the early 1980s London National Archives Beasley says I'm reluctantly driven to the conclusion that there was a conspiracy deliberately to put the Lusitania at risk in the hopes that even an abortive attack on her would bring the United States into the war such a conspiracy could not have been put into effect without Winston Churchill's at the time Churchill was first the Lord of the Admiralty express permission and approval it's important in the midst of a war to ask well is what's going on inherently justified whether it's based on truth their lies you have to look at the results in a book titled in search of Churchill written by Sir Martin Gilbert in 1994 very Pro Churchill historian he's been given exclusive access to many of the Churchill documents he states seven hundred and sixty two thousand one hundred and six civilian deaths resulted from the British blockade of Germany very hard to portray Kaiser Wilhelm as the bad guy when this is going on on the other side there was later a report called the V report of the Committee on alleged German outrages to His Majesty's Government this is also known as the Brice report in which the absolute fabrication of the babies on bayonets in Belgium is used to get people supporting the war effort this way no matter what happens even if you have seven hundred and sixty-two thousand deaths you're responsible for how could you defend someone who puts a big bayonets onto babies this is the ultimate evil so any crime done on our side can be justified look who we're up against that is the logic of the propaganda here in 1917 we have the Balfour Declaration written by Arthur Balfour in a letter to Lord Walter Rothschild this was discussed in a book called facts are facts by Benjamin H Friedman and in a speech he gave at a 1961 conference basically he says the Balfour Declaration was a promise between was an agreement between the Zionists and the British in other words if the Zionists in America pulled Americans into war the British would grant Zionists a homeland in Palestine this is also discussed in a chapter of David Irving's book Churchill's war called we did it before we can do it again referencing a letter between Haim Weitzman and Winston Churchill moving on to the Second World War the molotov-ribbentrop pact the Hitler Stalin alliance the Nazis had made an agreement with the Soviets that they would invade Poland on September 1st and the Soviet Union would invade on September 17th that ended up happening however this is a case of holding of not having a justified position or a consistent position on why you're waging war on a group they wage war on the Nazis and Ally with the Russians on invading Poland was the great initial crime to start the war how can they claim to have the moral high ground if they ally with someone who committed the exact same crime on the american front a in January 2nd of 1972 an article was published by the New York Times this is important because it shows how even mainstream outlets can cover something decades ago and it still can't make its way into the populous because it's crowded up crowded out by all the other war propaganda the article is titled war entry plans lead to Roosevelt in which it says President Franklin D Roosevelt told Prime Minister Winston Churchill in August of 1941 that he was looking for an incident to justify opening hostilities against Nazi Germany this consisted of nine hundred and fifty volumes the article goes on to say he Roosevelt obviously was determined that they should come in Churchill quotes Roosevelt he was going to become more and more provocative if the Germans did not like it they could attack American forces in 1954 a book came out called the final secret of Pearl Harbor by rear admiral robert a Theobald one final quote in this previous article Churchill quotes Roosevelt saying everything was to be done to force an incident back to the final secret of Pearl Harbor by Rear Admiral Robert a Theobald he quotes Secretary of War Henry Stimson also a skull and bones member in a subsequent meeting Stimpson recorded the question was how we should maneuver them the Japanese into the position of firing the first shot in other words far from being this oh please don't get us in and then were attacked by the crazy Japanese for no reason against our best will we were coerced into coming into the war absolutely not the case in 1982 a book titled infamy by John toll and he quotes Secretary of War Stimson saying we face the debt according to Simpsons diary we face the delicate question of the diplomatic fencing to be done so as to be sure Japan is put into the wrong and makes the first bad move overt move amazing how things can be said so many years ago and still not enter the public consciousness in 1999 a book titled day of deceit the truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor by Robert Stinnett primarily focuses on one document titled the McCullen memo this was an eight step strategy that could get the Japanese into striking America creating the first move to justify u.s. entrance into the war to get the nation behind it and to have a official justification seven of these eight actions ended up being implemented document again was written by Arthur McCullen later we have the Export Control Act of 1940 this was a partial implementation of the McCullen memo we also have the US and Britain freezing Japanese assets oil shipments and silk imports halted this was another part of the McCullen memo that was later implemented now moving on to another war the Korean War this is an example of Korea having never attacked the United States according to texts of accounts by Lucas and Considine on interviews with Douglas MacArthur in 1954 the New York Times April 9th 1964 published States I could have won the war in Korea in a maximum of 10 days I would have dropped between 30 and 50 atomic bombs on North Korea statements of genocide absolutely terrible at some point you have to ask yourself who is the bad guy do you still hold the moral high ground is it worth killing one civilian to stop the spread of communism from the north for the South yes dropping between 30 and 50 atomic bombs aerating the place for years killing untold number of civilians those are other questions that need to be discussed general Curtis LeMay referring to the Korean War over a period of three years or so we killed off what 20% of the population according to a book the general and World War two by Richard Rhodes published in 1995 in other words the people in power the establishment have no problem committing absolute genocide do they have the moral high ground should they be given all this power should we trust them no no no moving on to the Vietnam War which from the time the u.s. started arming and engaging in funds to the time they left was about 1953 to 1975 the Gulf of Tonkin incident was discussed in this excellent documentary the fog of war in which Robert McNamara says yes there was an attack and well basically we had had faulty information that explanation can be seen in this movie not until 2003 notice the war was entered under false pretences there never was an attack at the gulf of tonkin but there was an attack in 1967 which we'll get to very soon this again cannot be stressed enough the US entered a war based on lies resulting in the deaths of about two to three million Vietnamese and slaving more people through the draft and killing fifty-eight thousand three hundred Americans no one went to jail his punishment was becoming president of the World Bank and getting all the medals in the world Johnson of course never held accountable for this crime and the lie this was also an idea come up with by Jim Morrison's father who worked in the Navy next we have the operation Northwoods document which was written in 1962 by Chiefs of Staff lai Mille M Lemnitzer this was released in 2001 in a book titled body of secrets by James Bamford and it was reported by ABC in May of 2001 the document discussed starting friendly having friendly Cubans start riots in Florida Miami Florida and Washington DC it said we could use the radio airwaves to create the illusion that we were under attack or that there was hostilities coming from Cuba we could start fires on the air base we could sink a ship near Havana Harbor and conduct mock funerals for the victims we could have a remember the main incident we could blow up a u.s. ship at Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba this is the false flag mindset this is entering Wars based on deception in plain writing a casualty list in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation the Central Intelligence Alliance with US newspapers was later released in documents for an operation title operation Mockingbird we could the Operation Northwoods document continues develop a communist Cuban terror campaign in Miami and Washington including faking and faking a hijacking of an aircraft operation ranch hand was part of the Vietnam War in which it was an herbicidal warfare programming under Operation trail dust which consisted of spraying an estimated 20 million u.s. gallons of defilements and herbicides over rural areas of South Vietnam in an attempt to deprive the Vietcong of food and vegetation cover we were just aiming for the enemy I'm sure these poor guys on both sides fighting this war are simply just enslaved by the rulers it's a war between the rulers every freakin time and the innocent people pay the price simply because they are duped and frankly or undermine control this operation Ranch Hand was where Agent Orange was spread the government was just spraying chemicals in the air to kill the population this took place between 1961 and 1971 another thing to reference is the st. Louis cold war experiments that took place so if you're ok with them using it on the Vietcong or the Communists or the terrorists or the bad guys in town it will be used on you st. Louis cold war experiments CBS News moving on Operation Rolling Thunder took place between March of 1965 in November of 1968 under lyndon b johnson in which 864 thousand tons of american bombs had been dropped on North Vietnam during Rolling Thunder compared to the six hundred and fifty thousand six hundred and fifty three thousand tons dropped during the entire Korean War and five hundred and three thousand tons in the Pacific Theater during the Second World War this is terrorism this is genocide in 1868 we had five hundred unarmed villagers massacred this is known as the My Lai massacre in which we only know about because of one whistleblower officer Hugh Thompson Ho Chi Minh the great evil man in North Vietnam actually turns out to be a CIA / OSS asset we can read this on CIA aid of the OSS role in Ho Chi Minh's rise to political power by Bob Bergen this is one of many examples of intelligence agencies funding someone and later going to war with them claiming look at all the power we have more on that later the Pentagon Papers volume three chapter three state 70% of the reason the US is staying in the war is to avoid a humiliating us defeat to our reputation as a guarantor these were released by the heroic whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg in other words they were not fighting for democracy they were not fighting against communism they were fighting simply to have their reputation kept in place that's our justification for mass murder imagine if bombs were raining over America and that was someone else's justification unbelievable there is a great deal of disagreement on this next deception the Vietnam negotiations that took place in Paris in 1968 according to rich Christopher Hitchens were said to be sabotage using Kissinger as a spokesman for Nixon in other words telling the North Vietnamese if you hold out and don't make peace with the Johnson administration and Nixon gets elected will give you a much better deal similar things were said about Reagan and the Iran hostage negotiations more on that in further work I'll try to get to in a document titled 1:03 at 5-9 6-0 under the lyndon b johnson ministration the CIA pop Kling chooses to have the desire to popularize the term conspiracy theory or conspiracy theorist in other words anyone who questions the Warren Commission will be labeled a conspiracy theorist people who question the powers that be who questioned wars based on lies call them a conspiracy theorists notice the document doesn't say make sure we have legitimate evidence make sure we consider whether or not we're wrong make sure we respond to them with logic reasoning documentation just says call him a conspiracy theorist today it's used all over the place on June 8th 1967 a naval research ship the USS Liberty was attacked in which 34 service members were killed outside of Egypt by Israeli fighter jets this was used to get Americans and the West to enter the six-day war on behalf of Israel this quote accident on may of 1968 resulted in the Israeli government paying three point three two million dollars so a non-existent attack in Vietnam gets us into a war an actual attack by Israel gets us to support Israel in the six-day war if you think foreign policies about keeping people safe I would ask you to kindly reconsider moving on to the Gulf War in 1991 US ambassador April glaspie on July 25th 1990 said to Saddam Hussein we have no opinion on your arab-arab conflicts such as your dispute with Kuwait Secretary of State James Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction first given to Iraq in the 1960s that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America in other words do whatever you want we're gonna stay out of this so you don't have to ask us what our opinion is later well to move to go back Saddam's claim was that Kuwait was over drill in a shared geographical area where they both Iraq and Kuwait were drilling for oil this led to Iraq invading Kuwait now this lie called the NA area testimony and why a-are iah consisted of a woman claiming to be a nurse in Kuwait in which she saw the Iraqi army come into the hospital take the babies in incubators not the babies on bayonets the babies and incubators throw them on the floor to die to quote President George Bush citing this incident to justify the invasion this was to systematically dismantle Kuwait morally and in the 1990 Human Rights Council it was not only mentioned by President Bush Senior but seven senators mention this while propagating for the war turns out this was a lie promoted by a public relations organization known as Hill & Knowlton still around today of course leader in 1991 after the Gulf War there were sanctions implemented on Iraq blaming all of the people for the actions of a few just imagine if it happened in America the document titled I rocky water treatment vulnerabilities led to the deaths of milk untold numbers of children before I get into this I'm not sure if this is a reliable figure what matters in the following statement is how the elites respond to mass death they have created basically the chemical chlorine was banned from entering the country and in May of 1996 Madeleine Albright who was then US ambassador to the UN was asked by Leslie Stahl of 60 minutes in reference to years of us-led economic sanctions against Iraq taking place under father George Bush and Bill Clinton Lesley Stahl says we have heard that half a million children have died I mean that is more children than died in Hiroshima and you know is the price worth it Madeleine Albright responds I think that is a very hard choice but the price we think the price is worth it here we have Ronald Reagan tower telling around with the Taliban this includes an operation called Operation cyclone this was a codename for the United States Central Intelligence Agency CIA program to arm and finance the Mujahideen in Afghanistan another case of funding a group and later going to war with them from 1979 to 1989 prior to and during the military intervention by the USSR in support of its client the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan one of the longest and most expensive covert CIA operations ever undertaken funding began with just over $500,000 in 1979 was increased dramatically to between twenty and thirty million dollars per year in 1980 and rose to six hundred and thirty million dollars per year in 1987 so when ben shapiro tells john stossel with a straight face the US has never been involved in afghanistan not until they attacked us on 9/11 he's blatantly lying this article came out Wednesday the 24th of March 2004 titled Bush according to of the Guardian Bush team agreed to attack the Taliban the day before September 11th so far from 9/11 happening the government saying oh we got to find out who's behind this doing research getting sources they had already planned on invading Afghanistan before that the report pointed out that agreement on the plan which involved a steady escalation of pressure over three years had been repeatedly put off by the Clinton and Bush administration despite the repeated failure of attempts to use diplomatic and economic pressures allegations from a former White House counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke that the Bush administration's ideological obsession with Iraq had hindered the momentum of the struggle with ELQ in the months before the attack mr. Clark claimed that the plan to increase the pressure on the Taliban was inherited from the Clinton administration going back to the Clinton administration a group called the project for a new American Century wrote a paper called the Afghan vortex which you can look into if you want more on this : Powell said the September 10th meeting was with top White House officials in which they agreed to the strategy towards the Taliban demonstrated a new determination to deal with al-qaeda all before 9/11 these plans are taking place from the spring of 1997 to September of 2001 the US government tried to persuade the Taliban to expel bin Laden to a country where he could face justice the efforts employed inducements warning and sanctions all these efforts failed at a meeting of the Bush administration's top national security officials on September 10th a three-phase strategy was agreed on September 10th before September 11th they agreed to invade Afghanistan this included covert military aid would be channeled to anti Taliban groups if both those options failed the deputies agreed that the United States would seek to overthrow the Taliban regime through more direct action after 9/11 George Bush and his administration rejected the Taliban handing over bin Laden so whereas previously it was we need bin Laden they're not going to give him to us so let's convince the intellectuals and the opinion makers and the CFR that that's why we need to go after them because they won't hand over bin Laden so after 9/11 the Taliban says you know what we'll hand him over to any third party country this was President Bush rejected this also according to the Guardian Sunday October 14th 2001 Bush rejects Taliban offered a hand to bin Laden over President George Bush rejected as non-negotiable and offered by the Taliban to discuss turning over a sama bin Laden if the United States ended the bombing in Afghanistan so stop killing civilians who had nothing to do with 9/11 and will hand him over to a third party country in which you could have a trial see innocent until proven guilty also applies beyond the geographical lines of America the president said the bombing would not stop unless the ruling Taliban turned bin Laden over turned his cohorts over turn any hostages they hold over more vague the better cohorts he added there is no need to discuss innocence or guilt we know he's guilty President the United States said that the Taliban would require evidence that bin Laden was behind the September 11th terrorist attack in the US but added we would be ready to hand him over to a third country unbelievable Taliban ready to discuss bin Laden hand over if bombing halts the Taliban would be ready to discuss handing over Osama bin Laden to a neutral country if the u.s. hosted the bombing of Afghanistan a senior Taliban official set said today but we know the plans according to Richard Clarke and : powell stated they had already planned this in invasion years ago this was in the making just looking for a justification what a gift 9/11 was Afghanistan's Deputy Prime Minister Haji abul Kabir told reporters that the Taliban would require evidence all require were evidence that bin Laden was behind September 11th attacks in the United States if the Taliban has given evidence that Osama bin Laden is involved and the bombing campaign stopped we would be ready to hand him over to a third country mr. Kabir added now couldn't the administration have said yep here's the proof exhibit a B 3 all the way to Z and then said oh and they still won't hand him over now we have a justification George Bush said in his own words there is no need to discuss innocence or guilt we know he is guilty plans for Iraq attack began on September 11th according to the notes did later by Donald Rumsfeld's one guy is associate of cold bomber see how they use vague terminology to link one group to another there was Russian meddling Russian interference in the 2016 election the more vague the better the more evil they can justify at 2:40 p.m. the notes quote Rumsfeld saying he wanted best info fast judge weather good enough to hit Sh meaning Saddam Hussein at the same time not only you BL I mean think of how smart he must be to know bin Laden and Saddam were behind 9/11 judge best info fast judge weather good enough to head Sh these people are pure evil go massive the notes quote him saying sweep it all up things related and not still waiting for him to go to jail over this he later says for more information seek the advice of PW referring to Paul Wolfowitz people often say well we need a big government because they need to stop things like 9/11 from happening however the August 6 2001 memo from the CIA to the Bush administration exposed by Condoleezza Rice testimony actually said bin Laden determined to strike the United States they either didn't stop it because of inefficiency or on purpose either way the claim that we need a powerful government so they can spy on us and stop bad things from happening even when they get the evidence they don't stop it imagine if you did this at your job here's my job requirements and you don't meet them in the most important aspect ever that leads to the death of 3,000 people and then after 9/11 Bush's Bush's approval rating skyrockets to 90% when he's down there with the bullhorn government revenues increase government power increases you get the Patriot Act so governments have no incentive to keep you safe George Bush on Iraq referring to the weapons of mass-destruction said the main reason we went into Iraq was at the time we thought he had weapons of mass destruction turns out he didn't but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction George Bush said at this White House press conference a number of lies surrounded Iraq not only WMDs but this included Valerie Plame getting exposed by a man named Richard Armitage and Scooter Libby exposed Valerie Plame as a CIA agent because after George Bush said we know Iraq is buying yellowcake uranium from Niger Valerie Plame's husband comes out in the New York Times and says nope that didn't happen here's what I didn't find in my trip to Africa I believe that transaction it's totally fraudulent even though Bush mentioned it in his speech trying to persuade the American people to invade Iraq another lie surrounding Iraq was that Saddam was colluding with al-qaeda to poison Americans through terrorism using anthrax however according to The Daily News May 9th 2002 the anthrax attack bug was identical to an army strain in other words these highly complex developed bio weapons don't just start popping up out of nowhere there's tons of intellectual property involved tons of secrecy so the likelihood that it would be identical to something found also in the United States Army capacity to use your a coincidental theorist if you believe that's a coincidence another lie we don't torture however claims from Guantanamo Bay and proof of Abu Ghraib was released the claim that we're just there to get Saddam we don't commit atrocities this was exposed as a lie by Bradley Manning in this video titled collateral murder published by WikiLeaks this was released this is regarding the July 12 2007 Baghdad airstrike another lie we don't spy on Americans we're just getting the terrorists we're only spraying the Vietcong with Agent Orange trust me it'll never be used on you we don't spy said the government however the Edward Snowden documents released prism PRI SM this operation was a codename for a program under which the United States National Security Agency NSA collects Internet communications from various US Internet companies moving on to Iran Gary Hart a senator published this in The Huffington Post presuming that you speaking to the head of Iran are not actually ignorant enough to desire war with the United States you might be well advised to read the history of the sinking of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor in 1898 and the history of the Gulf of Tonkin in 1964 he tells Iran hey look at one event that provably didn't happen the Gulf of Tonkin and look at another event in 1898 in other words these deceptions are policy this is what happens here this is what you should look at to see what we're gonna do in the future moving on to Libya Hillary Clinton laughably says we came all we saw he died this was referring to the 2011 military intervention in Libya known as operation Unified Protector so when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says this after claiming she was against regime change in Iraq after supporting it she claims to hate Russian interference in America Russian meddling in American politics through buying up ads on Facebook yet violently overthrowing politicians in other countries totally justified David Cameron claimed that airstrikes were used against civilians by Gaddafi and this was a justification for invading and overthrowing the Libyan dictator Gaddafi now it's important to realize we're not I'm not defending Saddam I'm not defending Ho Chi Minh I'm not defending Gaddafi I'm saying these wars are based on lies and often what results in these military actions has I'll kindly call them unintended consequences which end up being worse than the situation was previously had no intervention taking place very similar to economic unintended consequences and a great lie in this as every war has to have was Gaddafi supplies troops with viagra to encourage mass rape claims diplomat US Ambassador Susan Rice has also said without offering evidence that Iran was helping Syria to suppress dissent Oh helping Oh specifically thanks so much here's a nother lie by omission disposition matrix is a secret kill list that Barack Obama had informally known as a kill list it's a database of information for tracking capturing rendering or killing suspected enemies of the United States define enemies who gets to interpret that the most evil people on the planet nearly 90% of people killed in recent drone strikes were not the target US drone strikes have killed scores of civilians in Afghanistan Pakistan Yemen and Somalia this article here links to a primary source by the Pentagon it's important to read through these simply because you have to imagine if it were being done in America let's say there's a murderer in Manhattan you have to get the murderer you can't just start bombing Manhattan and either way let's say there was a target who said that that the targets a legit enemy of the United States you don't even know what enemy means but just because government says you're a target they get to kill you without trying who in 2013 MIT professor Ted pistol says there was no evidence for the Syrian chemical attack Barack Obama claimed to use as justification for bombing and invading Syria this wasn't this didn't come out until 2017 the main points consists of the White House document does not provide any evidence whatsoever that the government of Syria was the source of the chemical attack in concha Khan no evidence again entering a war based on lies that they're now crying because from wants to pull out of operation timber sycamore was the u.s. involved in supplying money and arms to the Free Syrian Army quote Free Syrian Army to fight Assad because Assad had committed these atrocities however these elements did consist of Isis of arming Isis and al Qaeda that's when the propaganda shifted from we're fighting al Qaeda terrorists who were fighting Isis what happened al Qaeda did they get defeated shouldn't we bring them home shouldn't that have been a day for celebration no the goal is to continuously create enemy so you can justify further Wars here's another blatant deception used on CNN you got to watch this interview the bona al-abaad full interview on Syria attack April 5th 2017 in which this little girl is used as a pawn by this asshole mother of hers to promote intervention from the United Nations from Britain from the u.s. to overthrow Assad more on overthrowing Assad in a minute this girl is clearly reading off a teleprompter you have to watch the interview to really see it there was no Lowe to which these people won't go you can follow her on Twitter she is now blocked me the mother runs the Twitter account but her English her second language English is really good for someone who's like seven now Newsweek comes out in the opinions section analyzing how now Madison jet referring to general mattis there was no evidence Assad used poison gas on his people referring to a 20-17 not the 2013 original attack now there's no evidence but we're still gonna send like 60 Tomahawk missiles imagine if a country sent 60 Tomahawk missiles onto American soil because Bill Clinton killed his own people at Waco well even if Assad did gas his own people these people are such liars in fact in this document from 1983 from the CIA is titled bringing real muscle to bear against Syria already talking about sharply escalating the pressures against Assad through simulation military threats against Syria with the sole goal of opening the pipeline Syria would also face a two-front war huh sort of like Assad and Isis in 1983 Israel would simultaneously raise tensions another important document Oded jinan a plan for Israel in the 1980s so here we have plans to overthrow for regime change in Syria going back decades really coming to fruition here again in 1986 a Declassified document from the CIA titled serious scenarios of dramatic political change in other words regime change on multiple occasions was discussed in Syria and in Syria militias armed by the Pentagon fight those armed by the CIA this is according to a Los Angeles Times article titled from published October 3rd 2016 the fighting has intensified over the last two months as CIA armed units and pentagon Armed Forces have repeatedly shot at each other while maneuvering through contested territory on the northern outs of Aleppo US officials and rebel leaders have confirmed in mid-february a CIA armed militia called forsen al-haq or Knights of righteousness was run out of the town of Maria about 20 miles north of Aleppo by Pentagon back Syrian democratic forces moving in from Kurdish controlled areas to the East Coast the Obama administration was funding the Free Syrian Army to the tune of 1.7 billion dollars in lethal and non-lethal aid in 2007 the retired four-star US Army General supreme Allied commander from the UN Wesley Clark States in a interview by Democracy Now on March 2nd 2007 that he was made privy to a document right after 9/11 so saying was Iraq attacked on 9/11 why are we going over there to which someone responds to him at the Pentagon oh it's worse than that we are going to take out seven countries in five years starting with Iraq then Syria then Lebanon then Libya Somalia Sudan then finishing off with Iran the plans are make decades in advance then justifications are used later on another blatant lie was we need security because things like the underwear bomber so we have to increase airport security and totalitarianism however the underwear bomber was working for the CIA as well as the Saudis Scott Bennett a heroic whistleblower posted a document titled show game a military whistleblowing report to Congress in which he states that the Swiss bank as well as the CIA are funding Isis and al-qaeda they are mom to fight Assad now they're the big enemy they arm Saddam to fight in Iran against the Iranians then Saddam's the beginning me they arm the Mujahideen in Afghanistan to fight the Soviets now they're the big enemy great deal of coincidences or conspiracy Rand Paul actually got into a dispute with Marco Rubio over fighting arming the Syrian rebels in Syria in which he says what we're gonna end up what we're literally doing is arming al-qaeda and Isis what you could make the argument for is arming Assad because he's the one fighting them in this quote civil war we'll get in get into that another time – which Marco Rubio says you're defending Assad the chemical weapons user even though on both occasions it was probably a lie so that's how they get you to defend Wars they just say you're on the side of X no no I never defended X I'm saying we shouldn't do Y so logic can also help us out with these things Operation Fast and Furious also known as the ATF gun-walking scandal also known as Project gunrunner consisted of 723 guns being given to the Mexican drug cartel this is hard for people to process because they go the good guys armed the bad guys up is down what this is a case of the US government getting caught arming another group underground as opposed to openly as they did with Isis in Syria they armed them underground arming all these groups in hopes of creating an incident to justify whatever they have planned more security more spending further invasion more privacy takeaways and so forth arming enemies also extended to the second world war in the lend-lease act also known as aid to our allies in which the US is funding the Soviet Union who they later claim look at all this power they have in the Cold War the best research on how the US didn't only give funds to but nearly built the Soviet Union is what Soviet technology with Western Finance I believe is the title it's a document by anthony sutton he goes in-depth into how the soviet union was sustained by US assistance another example of this was when union banking had their assets seized under the 1917 trading with the enemies Act in October of 1942 I believe basically Prescott Bush also skullenbones member grandfather to Bush jr. had been funding National Socialism in Germany through Union banking another example of arming the enemies was when Rumsfeld had this meeting with Saddam and they armed Saddam to fight in to fight the Iranians in the iraq-iran war dishonorable mentions this is the Venona secrets the definitive expose of Soviet espionage in America in other words they claimed that McCarthy was an absolute kook in 1995 it turns out well he was absolutely right there were about 350 communist spies in the US State Department alone this is another historical lie not to mention the Wounded Knee Massacre this was done as the result of the United States attempting the United States government in 1890 attempting to disarm the Lakota Pine Ridge Indian Reservation on the morning of December 29th the u.s. cavalry troops went into the camp to disarm the Lakota between 150 and 300 civilians died 25 soldiers died and 20 were given the Medal of Honor in 1990 both houses of the United States Congress passed a resolution on the historical Centennial formally expressing deep regret oh so if someone comes in attacks America they just have to promise to apologize in a hundred years absolutely disgusting and you don't think the government's going to enforce gun control you're out of your freaking minds moving on the small pots blanket is another swindle they've gotten us into the smallpox winter epidemic occurred in 1837 to 1847 till 1860 this could not have happened at least could not have happened with the knowledge of the people the information simply did not exist anymore then the Indians gave the European syphilis on purpose no they gave it to him because the information didn't exist they sold the Europeans tobacco to give them lung cancer to kill him no the information didn't exist Waco is proof that this u.s. foreign policy of criminality and deception will be used on you if you don't start rejecting it if you don't start telling soldiers hey these wars are based on lies here's my evidence here's my reasoning please consider Wars a racket was basically a whistle blower General Smedley Butler highly decorated veteran from the First World War exposes something called the business plot researched under the McCormick's Dickstein committee basically saying war is fought for profit and based on lies we also have a former world war ii general and president of the united states coming out saying we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence whether sought or unsought by the military-industrial complex in 1961 three years later you have the Gulf of Tonkin incident a fake incident used to justify further military spending Donald Trump came out and said we're gonna support the Saudis cuz they support the military-industrial complex in a statement from President Donald J Trump on standing with Saudi Arabia after khashoggi was killed now this is a perfect example they're committing genocide in Yemen and it gets no little to no attention khashoggi gets murdered and dismembered and it's horrendous this is goes back to a single death is a tragedy a million deaths is statistic it's all on how the media chooses to report on it also one important thing about wake up no one went to jail no one was prosecuted Janet Reno wasn't taken into a cell for this Bill Clinton wasn't imagine if a non-government entity had done this it would be seen as murder as terrorism this killed more so when I hear them say look at the Las Vegas Massacre we therefore need gun control and give him to who these people Donald J Trump says in a statement regarding the khashoggi incident of the four hundred and fifty billion dollars the Saudis will be spending in America a hundred and ten billion will be spent on the purchase of military equipment from Boeing Lockheed Martin Raytheon and many other great US quote defense contractors so here we have the difference between the government the state and the market capitalism free markets volunteerism the state acquires property and does trades by initiating violence against peaceful people the market cannot take a penny out of your pocket cannot force you to do anything unless you voluntarily choose to contractually trade with someone else the market is volunteerism the state is coercion so we can't really have any right to be surprised when all these wars all these famines all this economic ruin all this genocide occurs because we're granting the state of monopoly on the right to initiate violence against peaceful people who was attracted to that machine the most evil psychopaths on the planet even if you're Psychopaths say you don't like Rockefeller or Carnegie or Vanderbilt or Trump in the private sector they can't take a penny out of your freaking pocket they can't make executive orders they can't pass laws they can't wage wars the state is the enemy the market voluntourism peace is the solution basically war is used as a divide and conquer strategy the reason government needs all this power all this influence is because of those people over there communists the drug dealers the terrorists they're so bad the bourgeoisie the 1% look at how bad they are in order to fight them to counteract their total power and their evil you need to give us a ton of money you need to give us a ton of power that is the reasoning behind the divide and conquer strategy I'd like to end with James Forrestal being quoted by Joseph McCarthy saying consistency has never been a mark of stupidity if the diplomats who have mishandled our relations with Russia were merely stupid they would occasionally make a mistake in our favor both Joseph McCarthy and James Forrestal were taken to Bethsaida Hospital and found dead both under mysterious circumstances thank you for watching keith's night don't tread on anyone this has been America's foreign policy of deception omission and criminality thank you for watching

6 thoughts on “America's Foreign Policy of Deception (Lies, Omissions, and Criminality)

  1. Thank you for caring about our country and about people everywhere to do all of this research and the guts and grit to present it. I agree about the slavery of our various wars. Rickover concluded that the explosion came from within the hull. British divers photographed the Lusitania prohibited munitions a decade or so ago. Wilson hired Sigmund Freud's nephew Edward Bernays to push the public to war through mind control and propaganda and then Bernays and Walter Lippman wrote books bragging about it. Thank you for bringing up the Balfour Declaration. Agree about Day of Deceit. Agree about the genocides of our various wars. I am sure youtube will direct traffic away from your video as they did from mine. People are stupid, and they die and their kids die because of it. Respect and Thanks.

  2. Please excuse the question, but: What on earth happened to the 'Mark Passio ARK Drive Collection' you uploaded on archive.org?
    It was a good information ressource…

  3. Its amazing just how dangerous and destructive the belief in government is. It is even more amazing that almost no one can see it.

  4. The True Flag by Stephen Kinzer is a great book about the Spanish American War and more broadly the beginning of America's imperialistic policies. Usually an overlooked period in US history

  5. Love your work Keith… it looks like Larken Rose is going to stop doing the candles in the dark seminars and was just wondering if you would ever think about doing something along those lines? Even if you role-played and did a version of it like you once did with him through a hang out I think it would be very helpful to the community.

    What do you think?

    By the way do you consider yourself a libertarian or an anachist these days?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *